Contact Us
Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
© 2025 Jeifer Pharmaceutical, All Right
Reserved.
People have searched for ways to keep wounds and surgical areas clean since the beginning of medicine. The story of chlorhexidine reaches back to post-war Britain, in the laboratories of Imperial Chemical Industries, with the original synthesis coming in 1954. Scientists looked for new agents that could handle a broad spectrum of germs without causing harm to people. Over time, the compound found its way from early antiseptic trials to every corner of clinical practice. I have seen how chlorhexidine gradually replaced alcohol and iodine in hospitals thanks to its gentle touch even on sensitive skin and its power against bacteria. The trust built up over decades has turned it into a mainstay for infection control.
Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride comes with a quiet reputation: colorless or slightly yellow crystals, odorless, and an almost bitter taste. What makes this compound important is not just its cleansing ability but the consistency and reliability it offers in hospital and laboratory settings. Pharmacists, nurses, and researchers know the material as an irreplaceable raw ingredient for mouthwash, wound dressings, medical device coatings, and preoperative scrubs. Many names hit the label—Hydrex, Hibitane, CHG Hydrochloride—but they all point to the same key ingredient, anchoring protocols for cleanliness and safety. In daily work, the presence of high-grade, pure material means the difference between sterile and risky, effective and questionable.
The real character of a chemical shows up in its properties. Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride stands out because it dissolves well in water, slightly in ethanol, and shrugs off many organic solvents. The solid form melts at about 134°C, which gives confidence during sterilization and storage. A pH close to neutral makes it gentle for patient use and ideal for mixing with other drugs. It carries a heavy molecular weight of 625.5 g/mol, so every gram packs a punch. The molecular formula, C22H30Cl2N10•2HCl, reflects a robust structure built for hospital environments, where reliability outweighs everything else.
Each batch rolling out of pharmaceutical factories must pass tests that don’t forgive imperfections. Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride for BP, EP, and USP needs purity at or above 98.0%, low levels of chloride and sulfate, and no visible foreign particles. Moisture falls under strict controls—pharmacists pay close attention to this because excess water knocks stability sideways. Hazard labeling isn’t just a technical step; hospital staff, warehouse crew, and transport specialists rely on those warnings about eye or respiratory irritation to handle it safely. Consistent and clear labeling means fewer mistakes in fast-moving clinical situations.
The method for preparing this special grade isn’t simple cookery. Starting from p-chloroaniline, the process involves complex reactions, including the coupling with hexamethylenetetramine, then careful hydrolysis and final conversion to the hydrochloride salt using concentrated hydrochloric acid. Each step, watched carefully by trained chemists, sorts out unwanted byproducts and leaves the purification columns clean. The final product comes from lots of patience and demands for quality. Cleanrooms, careful worker hygiene, and strict adherence to GMP build up a material users can trust inside and out.
Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride reacts in expected ways for a big, basic compound. It bonds with various acids to form other useful salts—acetate, gluconate, and digluconate appear in mouthwashes and hand rubs for hospitals. Chemists push it further, grafting the molecule onto polymers or surfaces for antimicrobial coatings on catheters, implants, or surgical sutures. In my own experience, watching a simple irrigation solution stop wound infections shows how minor tweaks in formulation give real-world results in patient recovery.
Walking down the aisles of a hospital supply room, the same molecule hides behind many different tags—CHX HCl, Hibitane Hydrochloride, and even the mouthful 1,1’-Hexamethylenebis[5-(p-chlorophenyl)biguanide] dihydrochloride. These names mean the same to regulators and pharmacists, but manufacturers label by local rules and client needs. A familiarity with synonyms cuts down on confusion and streamlines sourcing and training in large organizations or in cross-border work.
Staying safe comes from habit and good materials. Even with a clean track record, Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride can still sting, irritate skin, or harm breathing if inhaled or spilled. Strict rules set by OSHA, REACH, and WHO make sure instructions for gloves, ventilation, and washing off spills stay front and center for anyone handling bulk powder or strong concentrates. In the chaos of an ER, clear protocols save time and discomfort. From my daily rounds, I’ve seen that those warnings on the drum and the habit of double-checking keep real accidents to a minimum.
Uses for Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride spiral outward from hospitals and research labs into veterinary clinics, food factories, and dental offices. It lines up in skin cleansers, mouthwashes, wound irrigation, and even lubricants for surgical tools. The range stretches to dairy farms and community health programs in low-resource regions for cord care, showing the global reach and trust in this molecule. Institutions lean on it because patients heal faster with fewer infections, surfaces stay safer, and even delicate devices like catheters can stay inside for longer without causing harm.
Decades of research don’t stop folks wanting better. Scientists keep checking resistance trends, mixing Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride with new agents, tweaking formulas for fewer allergic reactions, and searching for less cytotoxic analogues. Trials in multi-use mouthwash, gels for periodontitis, and anti-infective coatings get presented each year at pharmacology and dental conferences. Out in the field, researchers dig into data on hospital-acquired infection rates, hoping to track improvements that deliver both patient and cost benefits.
Interest in patient safety pushed toxicologists to delve into every possible effect. Doses below 2% in ready-to-use solutions rarely cause anything worse than mild skin irritation. Swallowing makes people sick but rarely life-threatening. Only high, repeated exposures put kidneys and the nervous system at risk. Patient records on allergic rash or anaphylaxis remain rare, but teams keep an eye on trouble with long-term or high-strength exposure. In veterinary and environmental settings, rules on use and disposal stem from these studies, so neither patients nor workers and animals face unnecessary harm from what has become a daily-use chemical.
Looking ahead, the path for Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride weaves between keeping its crown and exploring new ground. Demand will keep rising as the world focuses ever more on hospital hygiene, minimizing antibiotic resistance, and speeding up healing times. Smart surfaces with slow-release coatings, antimicrobial dressings, and new dental applications sit in the development pipelines. There’s talk about green chemistry sourcing methods and more resistant-proof formulations. For now, daily practice in hospitals and clinics worldwide continues to depend on the reliability, proven track record, and adaptability of this old but still valuable workhorse.
Hospitals are always trying to keep infection rates down. The humble brown bottle of chlorhexidine solution sits on shelves for a clear reason. Chlorhexidine hydrochloride isn’t some fancy, experimental chemical. It’s the stuff that actually stops germs in their tracks day after day. Bacteria don’t have much of a shot against it, which matters a lot on a surgical ward, during dental visits, and even with wound care at home.
This ingredient shows up in almost every hospital’s supply closet. Surgeons scrub their hands with it before putting on their gloves. Dentists reach for it to lower infection risks before oral surgery or even routine cleanings. Patients rinse mouths with it before and after procedures so that healing happens in a cleaner environment. If you’ve ever had a wound cleaned or a port sterilized, there’s a good chance chlorhexidine did the heavy lifting. Pharmacies stock it not because of marketing, but because studies back up its ability to kill a broad range of bacteria without allowing too much resistance to develop.
Healthcare-associated infections drove thousands toward more serious illness before antiseptics like chlorhexidine came along. Today, the numbers tell a different story. For example, a review in BMC Infectious Diseases showed how using chlorhexidine to clean central venous catheters cuts bloodstream infections by up to 50%. This drop saves resources, lives, money. I remember a nurse telling me she trusted chlorhexidine most for prepping IV lines because she’d seen fewer infections since her hospital switched to it.
It’s easy to picture chlorhexidine just in hospitals, but daily dental cleanings and home wound care show another story. People use it at home, following doctor’s orders for mouth rinses to manage gum disease. Some over-the-counter antiseptic creams and solutions use pharma-grade chlorhexidine because it’s gone through stricter testing. This level of quality matters for those with compromised immune systems, older adults, and new surgical patients living at home, because a small cut can turn into a big problem.
Not all chemical ingredients pass the same quality checks. The pharma-grade label means purity tests, assay checks, and traceable manufacturing records. The British (BP), European (EP), and United States (USP) Pharmacopeias lay out strict testing to make sure contaminants and variations don't sneak through. Patients and doctors expect those standards, because lives sometimes ride on a bottle of antiseptic working just like it should.
Chlorhexidine will keep showing up in wards and clinics, but smart use can't slip. Germs keep evolving. Overuse risks building up resistance. Some hospitals rotate antiseptics or reserve chlorhexidine for the highest-risk cases to keep its power intact. Good stewardship looks like research, awareness, and training staff in safe application. For families at home, storing and using any antiseptic based on a doctor’s advice shields both personal health and wider community safety.
Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride is known across healthcare and pharmaceutical circles for its trusted antiseptic properties. The pharmaceutical grade stands out because purity directly affects patient safety and treatment outcomes. In my years reviewing pharmacopeia standards, I’ve seen the importance of strict parameters, especially for compounds that touch so many aspects of healthcare—from pre-surgery skin prep to oral rinses.
Three major pharmacopoeias—British (BP), European (EP), and United States (USP)—guide how manufacturers produce and quality check chlorhexidine hydrochloride. For pharma use, each sets tight boundaries. Having read through these monographs, here’s what stands out:
Doctors rely on pharmaceutical chlorhexidine to manage infection risks in everything from wound care to dental treatments. Ignoring minor impurities may sound harmless, but patient reactions, contamination scares, and treatment failures tell another story. My work with regulators uncovered cases where batches straying just outside assay or impurity standards led to costly product recalls and reputational hits—never a small matter for either patient or manufacturer.
Adhering to these specifications starts in the warehouse and runs all the way to the final bottled solution or tablet. Suppliers with strong quality protocols, validated testing, and regular external audits reduce the odds of problems reaching hospitals. Pharmacists and clinicians should not have to worry about unseen risks in what they’re dispensing. Mandatory batch-level certificates of analysis and growing transparency in ingredient sourcing set the standard and enable end-users to hold the system accountable.
The pharma industry continues tightening standards as cases of contamination and resistant bacteria rise. National authorities, recalling what happened with contaminated raw materials, push hard for local testing and overseas supplier vetting. As a writer following drug quality reforms, I see investment in better traceability and real-time impurity scanning as the next leap. Patients deserve nothing less than pure, well-characterized chlorhexidine in every procedure and prescription.
Chlorhexidine hydrochloride shows up in a lot of hospital routines. People know it from mouthwashes at the dentist, from wound care in clinics, and from countless bottles of hand scrub lined up before surgery. Its persistent demand comes from its powerful role in controlling germs, a fact health professionals recognize every day. What sets the BP, EP, and USP pharma grade forms apart is the sharp focus on purity and consistency. These certifications aren’t just stickers—they tell pharmacists and product developers that the ingredient went through rigid checks for contamination, chemical profile, and solubility before getting the green light. In busy environments where infection stakes run high, this reliability can’t be overlooked.
According to the US Pharmacopeia, European Pharmacopeia, and British Pharmacopeia, the only way a pharmacist can trust that a batch of chlorhexidine hydrochloride will work as expected is if it has been tested for heavy metal traces, residual solvents, and particulate matter. Those contaminants may not be visible, but ignoring them risks introducing unpredictable effects in each dose. Past recalls in the pharmaceutical world stemmed from overlooked impurities—these mistakes don’t just tarnish reputations; real people pay the price. Patients with compromised immune systems, children, and the elderly all face the highest risk from careless sourcing.
With pharma-grade chlorhexidine hydrochloride, every container must match what the label promises. That kind of confidence only comes after manufacturers show documentation of testing at every step, not just at the end. I’ve seen how regulators dig into paperwork for every active ingredient and trace how manufacturers respond to surprise audits. Government agencies like the US FDA, UK MHRA, and EMA spell out requirements clearly because they’ve seen the fallout when companies cut corners to save costs. It’s never newsworthy when good quality ingredients do their job, but failures make headlines—and damage trust in the health system.
In practice, the most valuable trait in a pharmaceutical ingredient may be its predictability. Doctors and pharmacists rely on each batch to dissolve the same way, react the same way, and deliver consistent antimicrobial punch. Someone preparing a product for an in-hospital IV line flush has every right to demand raw material that won’t surprise them with clumping, separation, or questionable interactions. If you’ve ever known a family member whose infection took a turn in an intensive care unit, the idea of unpredictability in medical formulations feels personal as well as scientific.
Good enough shouldn’t cut it where public health is concerned. Companies sometimes face pressure to purchase cheaper, industrial-quality ingredients that haven’t met full pharma-grade standards. This route may lower costs short term, but it burdens healthcare providers with extra quality checks, and sometimes leads to expanded recalls. Anyone sourcing or prescribing chlorhexidine hydrochloride should insist on BP/EP/USP standard every time. Suppliers need to stay transparent about their certificates and batch records, and on the regulatory side, random testing and better penalties for non-compliance would level the playing field for responsible manufacturers.
Every dose carries an expectation set by science and trust. Chlorhexidine hydrochloride at BP/EP/USP pharma grade clears the bar for safety and consistency in demanding pharmaceutical environments. There’s little room for compromise—patients and providers deserve active ingredients they can rely on, batch after batch, especially where infection risks run high.
Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride shows up in hospitals, clinics, and manufacturing plants across the world. Keep it in a dry, cool spot away from sunlight. Moisture invites clumping or even contamination—a risk no one wants, especially for something heading into medicines or personal care items. Storing it below 30°C avoids breakdown or color changes. Protecting the powder from light and heat isn’t just good practice; it makes sure what’s delivered to pharmacies or factories remains stable and safe to use.
Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride holds serious power as a disinfectant, but it earns respect in the lab because it’s an irritant. Workers should reach for gloves, protective eyewear, and lab coats before handling the substance. Anyone who spent any time in a pharmaceutical plant has watched colleagues suffer skin or eye contact with strong chemicals; manufacturers build those safety lessons into daily routines. Preventing dust formation also limits inhalation risks, so closed containers and dedicated transfer equipment play a big role. Never underestimate how quickly powder can spread in an open-air environment.
Storing this compound next to incompatible materials, especially strong oxidizers, threatens quality and safety. Separate storage areas and color-coding work in every well-run pharmaceutical facility. Staff follow clear protocols on cleaning and segregating equipment, knowing that even a trace of contamination causes entire batches to be scrapped. Regular inspections and documentation help avoid surprises down the road—regulators check these logs with a sharp eye. Years of working with pharma-grade substances taught many technicians that cutting corners only leads to expensive recalls or, worse, safety events.
If Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride absorbs water from the air, it begins degrading—a change detectable by shifts in pH or the appearance of the crystalline powder. To keep shelf life close to the published minimum of two years, suppliers package the product in tightly sealed, non-reactive containers. Warehouses monitor for temperature swings and keep humidity in check with dehumidifiers. Documentation of batch numbers, expiry dates, and storage conditions supports full traceability. Customers choose manufacturers with a track record for shipment integrity, knowing the investment in careful storage cuts down on lost product and compliance headaches.
Improving things isn't about adding expensive hardware so much as enforcing habits. Training makes the difference. Hands-on practice with spill kits, refresher courses on chemical risks, and clear lines for reporting small leaks help everyone stay sharp. Good warehouses post clear signage for chemical segregation and make PPE easy to grab near entry points. Auditing these practices every few months makes it tougher for shortcuts to creep in. For industries with less access to high-end storage, simple investments in better moisture barriers and regular temperature checks close many of the risk gaps. Online resources from regulators and industry groups give free guides on storage upgrades that don’t break the budget.
Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride belongs in the right container, under the right conditions, in the hands of people who understand the risks and requirements. Years of pharmaceutical experience show that most mishaps tie back to skipped steps—a missed glove, a propped-open door, a forgotten log entry. Focusing on the basics, from PPE to proper segregation, makes all the difference. Done right, safe storage and handling keep products effective and protect everyone along the supply chain.
Hospitals, dental offices, and even the family medicine cabinet often feature Chlorhexidine Hydrochloride. This antiseptic puts up tough resistance against germs, which makes it appealing not just to healthcare professionals but also parents and patients dealing with cuts or sores. Some folks know it as the strong-smelling mouthwash after a trip to the dentist. Others remember it as the clear pink solution used before surgery. Its broad use brings comfort, but attention to safety matters grows right along with frequency.
I’ve watched patients reach for mouthwash or wound rinses without reading the label. It’s easy to think that something common carries little risk. But Chlorhexidine doesn’t play around. Swallowing even small amounts causes vomiting, stomach pain, or worse. Spilling it onto skin, especially sensitive areas, sometimes leads to rashes or burns.
In hospitals, medical teams stay careful because improper use has triggered allergic reactions. The most severe, anaphylactic shock, almost always comes as a surprise. This isn’t just a rare anecdote—it’s on record in peer-reviewed journals and national incident reporting. Fact checks from healthcare authorities underline the real risk: in Britain, several deaths linked to accidental intravenous or intra-arterial injection of Chlorhexidine have pushed for stricter protocols.
As a parent, I think about the advice I give my kids: rinse, spit, don’t swallow. When Chlorhexidine lands in the wrong spot—eyes, ears, deep wounds—the consequences can last. Reports link repeated mouth rinses to taste changes and stained teeth. In infants and the elderly, the danger of swallowing goes up. Here, the antiseptic’s benefits compete directly with its toxic potential.
Staff in care settings do their best, but systemic errors—like wrong bottle or wrong concentration—do slip through. Clear labeling and color-coding help, but high turnover and tired hands mean human error remains a weak point.
Over the years, medical professionals raised their eyebrows at another problem: bacteria changing to survive. Frequent use of any antiseptic, including Chlorhexidine, puts pressure on microbes to adapt. Part of my practice includes urging careful use, so that these cleaning agents stay useful. Professional guidelines caution against routine or unnecessary application.
The path to better safety runs through habit and awareness. Information cards in clinics remind people of instructions. Hospitals set up double-checks and keep high-strength Chlorhexidine away from general storage. Parents learn the rules before sending a bottle home. Manufacturers switched to packaging that limits dosing mistakes.
A lot of changes grew from paying attention to what can go wrong rather than assuming nothing will. Open conversations, clear advice, and real training always help more than silent assumption. I’ve seen families and staff alike adjust quickly once risks are explained honestly.
Chlorhexidine isn’t going away. Its track record gives it a spot in treating wounds, fighting gum disease, or preparing for surgery. What keeps people safe is simple vigilance, and that starts with knowing more than just the product’s name. Whether in a hospital or home bathroom, the impact lies in careful handling, true understanding, and honest communication—habits everyone can choose to practice.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 1,1'-Hexamethylenebis(5-(4-chlorophenyl)biguanide) dihydrochloride |
| Other names |
CHX Chlorhexidine Chlorhexidine HCl Chlorhexidinum Chlorhexidine dihydrochloride |
| Pronunciation | /klɔːˌhɛk.sɪˌdiːn haɪˌdrɒk.ləˌraɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | “3697-42-5” |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `3D model (JSmol)` string for **Chlorhexidine** (commonly represented): ``` Clc1ccc(cc1)CN=C(N)NCCN=C(N)Nc2ccc(Cl)cc2 ``` This is the **SMILES** string which can be used in JSmol to render the 3D model. |
| Beilstein Reference | 25928 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:63637 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201 |
| ChemSpider | 95219 |
| DrugBank | DB00878 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03b3b098-ae01-49ae-9a55-0e4b8b7e4d08 |
| EC Number | CHLORHEXIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE BP EP USP Pharma Grade" has the EC Number "242-354-0 |
| Gmelin Reference | 114244 |
| KEGG | C07051 |
| MeSH | D016896 |
| PubChem CID | 957103 |
| RTECS number | MN0175000 |
| UNII | M0E0ZSF7EI |
| UN number | UN1903 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C22H30Cl2N10·2HCl |
| Molar mass | 625.55 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or almost white, crystalline powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.06 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Freely soluble in water |
| log P | 2.6 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 10.3 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 10.3 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | Diamagnetic |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.428 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 2.99 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 309 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | No public data found. |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | D08AC02 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. Harmful if swallowed. May cause allergic skin reaction. Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects. |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07, Danger, Causes serious eye damage, Causes skin irritation |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H312, H315, H319, H332, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-0-0 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 1800 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): 1800 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | DTXSID7064872 |
| PEL (Permissible) | 5 mg/m³ |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.12 mg/kg bw |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Chlorhexidine acetate Chlorhexidine digluconate Chlorhexidine dihydrochloride Chlorhexidine base Chlorhexidine gluconate |
Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
