Erythrosine started its journey in the 19th century when synthetic food dyes promised new horizons for food technology and medical applications. Many early colorants entered the market before thorough safety testing took hold. Regulators and scientists soon noticed not every colorful compound belonged in consumables, launching decades of research to separate safe colorants from risky ones. Erythrosine’s unique shade of pink-red quickly found favor, and researchers learned how to attach this dye to aluminum, making it less likely to bleed or migrate out of food and pharmaceuticals. By the time global standards like BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia) formed, Erythrosine Aluminum Lake had carved out a place thanks to increased stability, visibility, and usefulness in regulated products.
In daily work at the lab or the manufacturing line, what arrives under the name Erythrosine Aluminum Lake bears the bright signature of a cherry-red powder that refuses to dissolve in water. It provides a colorant that holds up in tablets, candies, and coated pills, and doesn’t fade quickly or transfer out of its intended spot. In pharma-grade form, it must pass a heavy load of tests: purity, particle size, heavy metal content, dye content, and its ability to perform the same way every time. The “lake” form grabs hold of the dye using aluminum hydroxide, forming particles that stand up to heat, moisture, and handling, helping industry craft predictable, stable products.
On the production floor, Erythrosine Lake brings a particular look and feel: a fine, pinkish-red, odorless powder with a consistency suitable for blending into excipients or food matrices. It refuses to bleed into water-based environments due to its anchoring to aluminum, but it persists in acidic or basic media. Technicians and QA personnel focus on its pH, solubility, and dye content, targeting a moisture balance that prevents clumping or uneven dispersion. The compound resists UV degradation for a long time, holding its bloom even in shelf-stable formulations. Chemically, it sits in the family of xanthene dyes as a tetraiodofluorescein derivative, which explains its vivid color and light absorption around the 530 nm wavelength.
Strict technical data holds the industry to high standards. Erythrosine Aluminum Lake must register dye content within prescribed limits, typically 12% to 18%. Bulk density, mesh size, and moisture content follow close behind with narrow allowed ranges. Analytical certificates back each batch. Labels go beyond simple identification; they include origin, lot number, full chemical name, dye content, and regulatory compliance marks. This information supports traceability from factory to pharmacy shelf. Manufacturers keep detailed batch records, documenting ingredient sources, process conditions, and results of all regulatory screening tests—especially given how many governing bodies watch over color additives.
Factoring in years of process development, most producers take Erythrosine dye (Acid Red 51) and precipitate it with aluminum hydroxide or another suitable alumina compound. The process starts with dissolving the dye in water and adjusting pH until the aluminum complex forms and settles out as a fine powder. Skilled technicians patiently control mixing speeds, addition rates, and temperatures, since slight deviations alter color strength and physical properties. The resulting lake undergoes repeated washing, drying, and grinding to reach the proper particle size. Rotating drum dryers, vacuum filtration, and controlled-atmosphere milling yield a colorant ready for quality testing and blending into product formulations.
Laboratories sometimes modify Erythrosine Lake to meet specific pharmaceutical needs. The core reaction hinges on chelation and precipitation, with the dye’s iodine-rich aromatic rings binding aluminum ions. Adjusting pH or introducing specialty surfactants can tweak how much dye anchors to the carrier or fine-tune bulk density for a particular tablet press. Stability tests stretch across months, looking for breakdown products, color shifts, or signs of iodine leaching—not something regulators forgive. Some researchers explore ion-exchange methods to boost safety or try to minimize trace metals, ever chasing cleaner, more reliable finished material.
Trade names and technical synonyms for Erythrosine Lake read like a roll call in any color chemistry department. You might know it as FD&C Red No.3 Aluminum Lake, C.I. 45430:1, E127 Lake, or just Red 3 Lake. Regulatory authorities may use slightly different codes for tracking, but the vivid, stable pink always points to the same compound. Each name ties back to years of cross-border standardization attempts as the global ingredient supply chain built up around common color specifications. Knowing all these aliases helps procurement teams avoid costly mix-ups and regulatory headaches.
Working with Erythrosine Aluminum Lake means strict adherence to occupational safety measures. PPE—including respirators and gloves—remain non-negotiable due to the risk of airborne dust and the dye’s intense chemical behavior. MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets) guide shipper, worker, and end-user alike, flagging potential hazards like eye or skin irritation, and possible iodine exposure, which proves especially tricky for individuals with thyroid conditions. Air extraction and dust suppression technologies keep work areas clean and limit accidental inhalation. Backup stock and emergency wash stations stand ready. Regulatory guidance from agencies like the FDA and EMA push routine batch testing for impurities and allergenic compounds, tightening operational standards.
The pharma world counts on Erythrosine Aluminum Lake for visual identification and patient safety, especially in multicolored or coated tablets. Visual coding goes a long way in helping both clinicians and patients. The food industry relies on its brilliance for confectionery, cake decorations, or beverage powders. Some personal care products, such as mouthwashes and toothpastes, build on its stability. Veterinary products, medical devices, and even pet foods sometimes use it for the same visual cues and branding. No matter the setting, traceability and labeling keep consumers in the loop, protecting public health.
Researchers keep a close watch on both the chemistry and human safety aspects. New analytical tools—such as HPLC and mass spectrometry—make it possible to detect trace impurities at far lower levels than before. Collaboration with toxicologists and regulatory affairs experts sharpens understanding of dose thresholds, bioavailability, and metabolic fate in the body. Process chemists focus on yield improvement and process greening, exploring ways to recover more colorant from less input, to reuse water streams, or to substitute less hazardous reagents. These innovations lower both economic and environmental costs, reflecting a broader shift in how ingredients are brought to market.
The topic of dye safety never fully quiets down. Toxicologists drill into long-term exposure, carcinogenic risk, and potential allergenicity. In the case of Erythrosine, studies from the 1970s and onward occasionally surfaced links to thyroid changes and increased risk of certain tumors—prompting some countries to ban or sharply restrict its use in foods and drugs. Ongoing animal studies explore metabolic breakdown, accumulation, and elimination. Some researchers seek to isolate pure iodine-free analogs or minimize total iodine carried into pharmaceuticals. These continuous efforts demand open data access, peer review, and swift regulatory adaptation. Safety data stays central to labeling, acceptance, and public confidence, holding manufacturers to the highest standards.
The future for Erythrosine Lake looks shaped by public health demands, global trade, and regulatory vigilance. As ingredient traceability and allergen transparency rise, so does pressure for cleaner production and rigorous testing down to the last particle. Synthetic dyes may see competition from natural colorants, though few options rival Erythrosine’s stability and intensity in pharmacopeia applications. Industry continues to hedge bets on improving synthesis, reducing impurities, and responding rapidly to any hints of risk. Policy may shift, but the core principles of repeatable quality, worker safety, and public trust will define how Erythrosine Aluminum Lake holds its ground in modern manufacturing and research. Any company working in color science knows, standards only get higher from here.
Walking through a pharmacy, you notice how many pills come in bright colors. These colors help people and medical professionals identify medications quickly. Erythrosine Aluminum Lake, known as FD&C Red No. 3, brings a striking pink shade to everything it touches. This food dye, processed into a “lake” form by binding with aluminum, offers stability in tablet and capsule production. In pharma, the grade matters. BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia) labels back up the safety and purity of what goes into medicines.
Color keeps things organized in hospitals, nursing homes, homes, and clinics. In my experience working at a community health center, patients faced real trouble when all their pills looked the same. Swapping medicines by mistake happens. With clear colors, including those from erythrosine lake, errors drop. Nurses and caregivers spot mistakes before they ever reach the patient. It’s not just a matter of convenience. In hectic emergency rooms, a quick scan for a red-marked tablet can save critical seconds.
Pharma companies prefer lakes because they don’t bleed or fade in high-moisture formulas. Over years of handling medicine samples, I noticed patients were more likely to take their prescriptions if the pill looked appealing. Children especially trust “pretty” colors. One stubborn pediatric patient I remember always gagged on chalky white tablets but took the bright pink variant with no fuss. For medications with a bad taste, a candy-like finish helps children feel less anxious.
The BP, EP, and USP marks signal manufacturers tested the dye thoroughly for contaminant and heavy metal levels. Global standards evolved because shortcuts in coloring agents led to historical tragedies—unsafe dyes once slipped into foods and medicines. Now, with these certifications, companies prove they have checked everything.
Governments keep a close watch. In the US, the FDA limits erythrosine's use. They monitor possible health effects. The European Food Safety Authority reviews the data every few years. In 1990, the FDA restricted its use in food due to studies around thyroid tumors in rats. Though those findings triggered debate, risk is managed in pharmaceuticals, where dye levels stay far below limits.
No one wants unnecessary chemicals, especially those managing allergies or sensitive conditions. Some patients react to dyes with skin rashes or breathing problems. Doctors and pharmacists often recommend dye-free alternatives. Accountability falls on both sides: pharma companies must warn about ingredients; prescribers must ask about allergies. In many clinics, you find colorless generics offered as alternatives.
Researchers keep digging for safer, more natural options. Some companies experiment with beet juice or turmeric, but these tend to fade or break down in medicines or sunlight. For the moment, tested and regulated dyes like erythrosine aluminum lake hold a place because they deliver disease-fighting medicine in a form patients can trust and use. Still, it’s up to the entire supply chain to work toward less risky, simpler coloring options everyone can accept.
Erythrosine Aluminum Lake goes by a few names—Red No. 3, FD&C Red No. 3, or sometimes just the coloring agent used to make tablets, capsules, and syrups more appealing. In practice, it’s a compound made by fixing erythrosine, a synthetic red dye, to aluminum, so it becomes less likely to dissolve in water. This helps keep the color stable in solid or semi-solid medicine forms. So, a child’s chewable vitamin or a pink cough syrup owes its flashy red tint to ingredients like this.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers Erythrosine and its lakes approved for drug use, provided companies stick to tight guidelines. Erythrosine gets reviewed regularly for risks like allergies, toxicity, and potential carcinogenicity. Animal tests flagged some concerns about high doses increasing thyroid tumors, which set off some controversy decades ago. In actual pharmaceutical use, the amounts are tiny—trace levels, limited to make any risk minimal, according to published risk assessments and regulatory updates.
Looking overseas, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) still allows Erythrosine’s use in drug products, with clear restrictions. Some groups push for a ban, pointing to those old animal studies. Yet broad consensus in regulatory science circles suggests those findings don't translate directly to the real-life doses people get from medicine or food. Still, certain countries like Norway and Austria take a stricter line, keeping more synthetic dyes out of medical products altogether.
In the real world, allergic reactions to Erythrosine seem rare. I’ve talked to pharmacists and read case reports—almost every verified allergy involves huge oral doses, like those used for diagnostic x-rays a long time ago. Everyday exposure via medicine seems pretty safe for most people. Those with thyroid problems do get flagged for caution, but for the ordinary person, an Erythrosine allergy turns up far less often than reactions to, say, penicillin or aspirin.
Consumers have become much more aware of what’s in their medicine through social media and transparent labeling. Parents especially want fewer artificial colors in kids’ medicine. That’s pushed drug makers to take a closer look at Erythrosine Lake, even if health risks stay low. Companies using the dye face pressure to prove it's still the right choice, balancing visual appeal with public trust.
Plant-based colorants like beetroot red or anthocyanins now pop up in over-the-counter medicines—but they come with their own hurdles, like fading under sunlight or not holding up well in heavy processing. Some manufacturers blend natural with synthetic dyes to lower total exposure without sacrificing product appearance or shelf life.
Every year, new research pushes the industry to adapt. But the current scientific evidence and strict rules in place keep the risks low for the average user. Drugmakers, pharmacists, and regulators all play a role—checking data, listening to feedback, and updating approaches as new facts roll in.
With drug safety, nothing stands still. People ask questions, regulations evolve, and manufacturers rethink old habits. Erythrosine Aluminum Lake probably stays on the shelf for a while, at least in low, regulated doses, but the call for more natural ingredients keeps building. Patients can ask their pharmacist about dye-free options or check resources like FDA’s published listings for more details. That sense of active, informed participation—on both sides—drives safer, more trustworthy medicines in the long run.
Specifications and purity levels shape how products get used, traded, and trusted. Most folks in manufacturing, food production, or health-related fields know quality documents act as the backbone for operations. I’ve seen shops slow down and even stall out because ingredients didn’t match the expected purity or came with vague specification sheets. Getting the details up front prevents a lot of costly surprises down the road.
Look at bulk chemicals like citric acid or calcium carbonate in a food factory. The spec sheet will list concentration, trace metals, color, moisture content, and even odor. Let’s say you order pharmaceutical-grade calcium carbonate. If the supplier says the material has “purity of 99.5%,” I always want that number broken down. Does that mean it’s tested for lead, arsenic, mercury, and microbial count? Factory QA teams like to see data tables showing exact measurements of those trace contaminants—this isn’t about being obsessive; it’s about keeping customers safe.
Food producers check these details. If you cut corners or miss a step, the end product may have off-colors, strange tastes, or worse, health hazards. In the pharmaceutical business, regulations push everyone to keep to strict limits on unknowns, with products often checked batch by batch against pharmacopeia standards such as USP or EP. Even paint makers demand clarity—one bad batch with the wrong ratios can cost thousands in wasted materials and delays.
On paper, “99.9% pure” looks reassuring, but what’s in that tiny 0.1%? That trace of something else could cause problems in sensitive applications. In my experience, suppliers who answer quickly about what tests they’ve done and who provide certificates of analysis build trust. If you ask about heavy metals, allergens, GMOs, or residual solvents, clear honest answers come out in the wash.
Some industries see product grades: technical, food, or pharma. Each class needs its own set of standards—people in biopharma audit suppliers on details I never thought about until I saw a regulatory inspection up close. Those teams wanted not just lab numbers, but proof of traceability and repeatability. One missed value and a truckload of material can end up quarantined.
Suppliers have gotten better at publishing clear tables and regularly updating certificates. Digital traceability helps—batch numbers linked straight to online reports or QR codes that bring up entire product histories. As a buyer, I’ve come to expect easy access to these details. Buyers should ask questions about quality checks and production controls, and it pays to stick with suppliers who share information freely.
Training teams to read and interpret specification sheets pays off. Tools like handheld XRF analyzers or basic lab wet tests bring verification on-site. By investing in quick validation, businesses sidestep a lot of mess later. I’ve found value in double-checking with outside labs before shifting to new suppliers—an extra cost up front, but far cheaper than a recall.
With increasing focus on sustainable practices and stricter standards, I expect even more detail showing up on specification sheets. Those who share honest data and back it with real certificates—proven by third-party labs—stand out. In today’s world, clear information about what’s inside a product and how it’s measured isn’t just paperwork; it’s a sign of accountability and care for the people and businesses who rely on the material every day.
Most of us never think twice about food coloring. Food manufacturers keep a close eye on compounds like Erythrosine Aluminum Lake because using it the right way means keeping people safe, keeping products bright, and making sure businesses stay out of trouble with regulators. This colorant might sound harmless, but feed it exposure to sunlight, moisture, or air for long enough and it can degrade or clump, making it tough to work with and potentially unfit for use. Accidents don’t just mean a spoiled batch—they can hit a reputation hard and put consumers at risk.
Humidity loves to wreak havoc on powdered ingredients. I’ve worked in kitchens and small factories, and most problems crop up where storage corners get muggy or hot. Good storage practice matters just as much in your own pantry as it does in an industrial warehouse. Tightly sealed, food-grade containers hold the key: they keep out dampness, block light, and prevent contamination. A dry, cool shelf or cabinet—preferably out of the direct line of heat sources or windows—goes a long way to keeping the colorant stable.
Handling practices can make or break a day’s work. I once watched a batch get thrown out because someone skipped gloves and dropped colorant across the worktable. Not only did it streak skin and clothes, but it also meant the rest of the product stood a good chance of picking up contaminants. With proper gloves and goggles, accidentally transferring powder to hands or eyes no longer stands as a worry. Simple handwashing and a habit of cleaning tools and surfaces after every shift can save raw materials and frustration.
Ingredient labels are not just legal requirements—they set out how each additive must be stored and handled. Erythrosine Aluminum Lake comes with documentation that spells this out for a reason. Whether in a small bakery or a major manufacturer, taking the time to double-check safety sheets for maximum storage temps, shelf lives, and any hazardous interactions pays off. Some powders tend to react poorly to acids or strong oxidizers, for example, so storing away from cleaners and certain other chemicals isn’t just a suggestion: it’s basic risk control.
In my own experience, accidents don’t ask for permission—they just happen. Spill kits with absorbent wipes or powder keep minor mishaps from spreading. Staff training means more than running through a checklist: it means making sure everyone actually knows how much colorant goes into what batch, and what to do if something goes sideways. Well-labeled containers, organized shelves, and regular reviews of safety practices help build that muscle memory. Poor management of additives can lead to costly product recalls, so a little care at the front end can keep a business running smoothly.
US regulations draw clear lines for anyone producing or selling food with Erythrosine Aluminum Lake. Inspections look for correct storage, clear labeling, and safe handling. Not just because of compliance—but because consumer trust rides on that attention to detail. Long-term storage generally means keeping colorants in their original, well-labeled packaging until needed. That’s a habit worth sticking to, whether for a giant facility or a local donut shop.
People talk about quality all the time, yet it’s easy to overlook how much work goes into proving a product is up to scratch. Ask any pharmacist, quality manager, or even someone in regulatory affairs, and you’ll hear just how central compliance is to building trust. Standards from the British Pharmacopoeia (BP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and United States Pharmacopeia (USP) carry a heavy weight—these aren’t just checklists, they act as the backbone of safe, reliable medications and ingredients.
Every batch of medicine or chemical ingredient needs a stamp of reliability. More than stopping a recall, meeting these standards keeps patients safe—nobody wants to find out an impurity crept in because some rule sat ignored. These are protections born from real-world problems. Think about past cases where contaminated medicine reached the shelves. Recalls, lawsuits, and public outcry followed. Standards draw a clear line: hit these marks or stay off the market. BP, EP, and USP requirements share a lot, but each ties into specific health policies. What passes in one country can face a red light somewhere else. That’s why companies with global reach pay close attention to which pharmacopoeias they need to satisfy.
I’ve spent time in labs and overseen more test reports than I’d care to count. There’s one lesson everyone learns fast: shortcuts don’t pay. When you see chemists running HPLC tests or microbiologists checking for endotoxins, they’re not just following rules—they’re catching problems before they reach a sick child or a senior who depends on their prescription. If you’ve ever sat through a regulatory inspection, you understand the pressure. Inspectors crosscheck every document. It’s all about showing, not telling, that each box truly got checked. One slip—a mislabelled lot, a missing certificate, a detection above threshold—and trust evaporates.
To say a product meets BP, EP, and USP standards isn’t just talk. A compliant product needs to match strict limits for purity, identity, and safety. Testing methods get spelled out in detail—everything from particle size to microbial counts. Batch after batch, labs test samples against these benchmarks. Proof comes as certificates, full-spectrum laboratory data, and a chain of custody that shows nothing was lost or tampered with along the way. Having a Quality Assurance (QA) team that knows each standard inside and out makes the difference between confidence and concern. Even an honest mistake—a wrong grade label here, a missed test there—can slam the door shut on a supply agreement or, worse, put patients in harm’s way.
Plenty of companies want to claim they hit every mark, but the truth is, resources and expertise matter. For small suppliers, meeting every global pharmacopoeia stretches budgets and bandwidth. Labs need calibrated gear, validated methods, and trained staff. Audits chew up time and money, yet skipping them just brings risks forward. Larger firms often build entire compliance teams who update documents after every revision. Smaller players can feel lost or overwhelmed. Here, sharing best practices makes sense. Industry groups, regulatory consultants, and shared databases do a lot to demystify the process. I’ve seen success grow when smaller companies pair up with contract labs or third-party auditors, letting them tap into experience they can’t build alone.
There’s always a way forward. More transparent ingredient supply chains make it easier to spot and address risks early. Open access to up-to-date pharmacopoeia standards and test methods keeps staff trained and ready. Encouraging collaboration, not competition, lets everyone raise the bar for safety and quality. For those who want peace of mind, demanding clear compliance documents—with batch-specific data and signatures—matters more than shiny marketing. Checking the paperwork isn’t being pushy, it’s just common sense. In my view, real compliance means less worry, fewer surprises, and a better shot at safe, effective products on everyone’s shelves.
Names | |
Preferred IUPAC name | disodium 2',4',5',7'-tetraiodofluorescein aluminum lake |
Other names |
Erythrosine Lake Erythrosine Aluminium Lake E127 Lake C.I. 45430:1 Red No. 3 Lake |
Pronunciation | /ɪˈrɪθ.rə.siːn ˈæl.jʊ.mɪ.nəm leɪk/ |
Identifiers | |
CAS Number | 568-63-8 |
Beilstein Reference | 3769905 |
ChEBI | CHEBI:104747 |
ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201192 |
ChemSpider | 72815 |
DrugBank | DB13911 |
ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100041018548 |
EC Number | 127-41-3 |
Gmelin Reference | 10458 |
KEGG | C16252 |
MeSH | D005008 |
PubChem CID | 5280345 |
RTECS number | WI6000000 |
UNII | 6MZ7L4Y3JU |
UN number | UN1219 |
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | Erythrosine Aluminum Lake BP EP USP Pharma Grade CompTox Dashboard (EPA): **DTXSID4056611** |
Properties | |
Chemical formula | C20H6I4Na2O5·xAl(OH)3 |
Molar mass | 879.87 g/mol |
Appearance | Dark red-violet powder |
Odor | Odorless |
Density | 0.5 g/cm³ |
Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
log P | 2.74 |
Vapor pressure | Negligible |
Acidity (pKa) | 3.6 |
Basicity (pKb) | 7.7 |
Dipole moment | 4.34 D |
Pharmacology | |
ATC code | A16AX |
Hazards | |
Main hazards | May cause respiratory irritation. May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. |
GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08, Warning, H315, H319, H335, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
Pictograms | GHS07,GHS08 |
Signal word | Warning |
Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
Precautionary statements | Keep container tightly closed. Store in a cool, dry place. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing. Do not breathe dust. Wash thoroughly after handling. Use only with adequate ventilation. |
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral) > 2000 mg/kg |
LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 2,000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/kg |
REL (Recommended) | 0.1 mg/kg |
IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
Related compounds | |
Related compounds |
Erythrosine Erythrosine Sodium Erythrosine Lake Erythrosine B E127 CI 45430 Aluminum Lakes of Erythrosine |