Back in the 1960s, pharmaceutical scientists needed a solution to persistent drug solubility issues found in the rapidly expanding world of oral solid dosage forms. Before this time, protecting medications from stomach acid or controlling drug release rates posed a major headache. The industry experimented with natural resins and shellac, but these materials could be inconsistent, lacking the predictability manufacturers needed for growing regulatory scrutiny. Hypromellose phthalate (HPMCP) entered the picture during this era, as cellulose chemistry advanced out of necessity rather than mere curiosity. Researchers aimed for something that could stand up to stomach acid but dissolve where it counted: farther down the digestive tract. That motivated explorers in cellulose ethers to modify hypromellose with phthalic anhydride. Pharmacopoeial standards, such as BP, EP, and USP, picked up the material by the late 20th century. Over the years, as markets globalized and data transparency toughened, this excipient has not lost relevance— if anything, it anchors many delayed-release tablet formulations on the shelves today.
Hypromellose phthalate falls into the broader family of cellulose derivatives: water-insoluble at low pH, but soluble once the environment swings alkaline. Companies turn to it to coat tablets and capsules that should bypass stomach juices untouched and dissolve in the intestine, which helps with drugs that break down in acid or cause gastric irritation. Pharmacopeial grades (BP, EP, USP) guarantee a consistent product: each batch standardized by tests like viscosity, degree of substitution, and phthalyl content. Laboratories run tight checks to make sure each lot meets set pharmacopeial benchmarks before a product ever reaches a mixing vessel. Reliable performance over decades has established HPMCP as a near-default choice in certain drug delivery systems. It’s tough to find a big-name capsule or enteric tablet manufacturer that hasn’t leaned into this polymer, especially for acid-sensitive actives or carefully timed drug absorption.
Hypromellose phthalate usually appears as a white to off-white powder. Its structure stems from cellulose, tweaked by swapping some of the hydroxy groups for methoxy and phthalate groups. The magic number for many applications is the degree of phthalyl substitution, which lands between 21% and 35% by weight depending on the intended application. In practice, this translates to a polymer that stays insoluble in water below a pH of 5.0, yet starts dissolving as the media rises toward neutral or basic, commonly above pH 5.5. The molecular weights span a broad range, which can influence film thickness and dissolution pace. Viscosity measurement tells a lot about how it handles in solution: thicker grades give stronger films but may be harder to process. The powder flows easily, though clumping occurs if stored in a humid environment. Pharmaceutical processors tend to store it cool and dry, because moisture can change the powder’s handling properties.
A pharmacopeial-grade excipient like HPMCP lives and dies by its documentation. Certificate of Analysis documents for every lot list values for phthalyl content, viscosity, loss on drying, pH of a 1% solution, heavy metals, and residual solvents. Labels on commercial packs declare these values, plus batch number, expiry, and manufacturer info, all in line with BP, EP, or USP requirements. Manufacturers guarantee that their HPMCP meets pharmacopoeial monographs, which means no detectable levels of dangerous impurities. For large pharmaceutical companies, traceability and supply chain security rate high on the priority list; tablets and capsules can face recalls if the excipients don’t clear regulatory audits. I’ve seen QA teams pull up five-year-old CoAs to confirm a product’s ingredient pedigree during inspections, and any mismatch could hold up an entire production batch.
Making hypromellose phthalate starts by reacting purified hypromellose with phthalic anhydride in the presence of a mild alkaline catalyst. Manufacturers use large-scale stainless steel reactors, and the process demands close monitoring of temperature and pH. Too aggressive on the reaction conditions, and the product turns dark or gels up, making it useless downstream. The finished material gets neutralized, washed to remove any free acid or catalyst, filtered, and dried under reduced pressure. Consistency between batches depends on how tightly the plant controls time, temperature, and phthalic anhydride feed rates. Some facilities automate the process from start to finish, but operators still spot-check samples. Even a slight uptick in residual phthalic acid or a drop in substitution level can show up later as an unexpected shift in film behavior during tablet coating.
The most important reaction in making HPMCP modifies the cellulose backbone by adding phthalic acid groups to the hypromellose. This forms strong ester bonds that resist hydrolysis in acid conditions but break in higher pH. Researchers sometimes tweak the process by blending HPMCP with other cellulose derivatives or adjusting the degree of substitution to fine-tune the enteric release profile. Some research efforts target greener synthetic methods or alternative phthalic anhydride sources to reduce environmental impact. Process development remains active because slight modifications unlock new applications: films that dissolve at slightly different intestinal pH ranges or that process more smoothly on high-throughput tablet coaters.
Hypromellose phthalate shows up under several names in product catalogs, depending on region and producer. Common aliases include hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate and HPMCP. Some manufacturers sell proprietary versions with distinct trade names—HP-50, HP-55, HP-55S—each code hinting at the phthalyl content or viscosity index. On labels, you’ll often spot HPMCP followed by a grade marker, indicating its performance characteristics. Navigating these brands requires technical know-how; poorly chosen grades can cause release rates to fall outside specifications, leading to failed stability tests and supply headaches.
Safety remains top priority in excipient use. Hypromellose phthalate generally earns a low-risk profile: it’s nontoxic, nonirritant, and doesn’t absorb from the gut, so it won’t trigger systemic side effects. Regulatory agencies in the US, Europe, and elsewhere have reviewed its safety dossier extensively, with the USP, EP, and BP publishing detailed monographs. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards cover every step in its life cycle, from synthesis to packing. Facility auditors expect to see dust controls, environmental monitoring, validated cleaning procedures, and secure storage for raw materials. Every trained operator knows the drill—lab coats, gloves, filtered masks for powder handling, and regular refresher training. In my work with QC teams, I’ve seen documentation drills that border on military precision when records go digital or regulators come calling.
Drug formulators reach for hypromellose phthalate whenever they want to deliver active ingredients to the small intestine. Enteric-coated aspirin, omeprazole, and certain antibiotics owe their effectiveness to reliable acid-resistance from polymers like HPMCP. The excipient’s predictable solubility behavior means less guesswork for generic manufacturers aiming to match branded drugs. Beyond prescription tablets, many over-the-counter supplements use enteric coatings to protect sensitive enzymes or probiotics from stomach acid. Some veterinary medicine manufacturers have also adopted HPMCP for long-release livestock pills. Experienced formulation scientists weigh HPMCP’s film-forming properties alongside its processing ease—coating lines can roll out hundreds of thousands of tablets per batch, and one poorly running excipient can jam up production runs. In crowded pharma factories, no one wants the line to stop.
Academic labs and pharmaceutical R&D outfits continue to hunt for tweaks in HPMCP chemistry that can improve release profiles or simplify manufacturing steps. Researchers publish papers on blends that dissolve at new pH triggers, protecting fragile peptide-based drugs or live bacteria through the upper GI tract. Scientists in advanced labs use imaging technologies to track exactly how HPMCP films dissolve, seeking improvements that translate to better patient experiences and longer shelf lives. Patent filings show a steady flow of cross-linked HPMCP forms, copolymers, and novel enteric blends. Some public-private research groups partner with excipient producers to push the envelope on both sustainability and functional coatings, answering calls for greener chemistry. My experience reading technical journals shows that innovation doesn’t let up—there’s always a graduate student or industry scientist finding a way to wring more performance from a classic compound.
Toxicological studies give hypromellose phthalate a clean bill of health by common regulatory measures. Researchers dose animals at values hundreds or thousands of times higher than humans ever would get in a single tablet; studies rarely see negative outcomes. No chronic toxicity, mutagenicity, or reproductive toxicity issues have come up in animal models. Skin and eye irritation studies find little or no reaction, supporting its safe handling status in coating and formulation facilities. The FDA and European Medicines Agency periodically review excipients of this class, and their risk assessments line up with the published data: HPMCP does not break down into harmful metabolites, or accumulate in the body. In my work reviewing safety data, I’ve found that any worries tend to stem from potential impurities left over from manufacturing, a concern handled by tightening regulatory specs and regular vendor audits.
Looking ahead, the pharmaceutical world will keep demanding excipients that perform reliably in more complicated formulations—think combination tablets, sensitive biologics, or personalized medicine. Hypromellose phthalate will likely remain a backbone excipient, but competition from newer, tailor-made polymers intensifies every year. Regulators lean harder on environmental impact and stricter residual solvent limits, meaning producers will keep investing in cleaner, greener synthesis routes. The rise of advanced oral delivery—like 3D-printed tablets and micro-encapsulated actives—calls for coatings that work in more complex contexts. I see potential for smart polymers derived from HPMCP chemistry to handle these challenges. Academic labs will stay busy inventing derivatives that offer selective permeability, triggered by gut enzymes or other biological events. Producers may branch out with digital tracking for every drum, linking raw material lots back to digital batch records all the way to the patient. The next chapter won’t shut the door on HPMCP, but it may bring a supporting cast of novel cellulose-based polymers into the spotlight.
Pharmaceutical development sometimes feels like cooking for someone with serious food allergies. Mess up the coating, and the medicine could lose its punch before it even reaches the gut. Hypromellose phthalate, known around labs as HPMC-P or commonly written as HP-55 and HP-50, steps in as a trusted ingredient for that very reason. It’s a mouthful to pronounce, but its job is pretty straightforward: help time the release of medicine in the body. Instead of just flooding your system after you swallow a tablet or capsule, this material acts as both a shield and a smart delivery system.
Plenty of pills—think of acid-sensitive drugs, enzymes, and probiotics—simply don’t play nice with stomach acid. The environment down there chews up many compounds before they ever have a fighting chance to help with what ails you. HP-P solves this: as an enteric coating material, it forms a protective layer over the medicine. The coating stays tough in acidic environments (like the stomach) but gets out of the way when pH rises in the small intestine. That way, the drug reaches the right spot to be absorbed where it works best.
By using hypromellose phthalate, pharmaceutical companies can control not just where but when a drug goes to work. That’s a big deal for people who take medication every day. Consistent and reliable drug absorption keeps things steady, especially when you talk about medicines for serious conditions—think blood pressure, chronic pain, or mood disorders. One missed release window can swing someone from feeling normal to feeling pretty rough.
Mistimed release doesn’t just waste the drug’s power; it might even spark a wave of side effects. The right coating helps cut that risk. My own time working alongside pharmacists showed me that patients stuck with enteric-coated medications tend to return less often with complaints about upset stomach or odd side effects.
Imagine taking a probiotic and never feeling any benefit because your stomach acid fried it. Or think about antibiotics where too much releases at once, making patients nauseous or leading to uneven blood levels. Without a coating like HPMC phthalate, those aren’t just “could happen” stories. They’re frequent issues pharmacists see when the protection isn’t up to snuff.
The move to plant-based sources is another area where this compound helps. Since hypromellose comes from cellulose, it’s vegetarian and suitable for people with dietary restrictions. Gelatin-based coatings pose issues for those with animal product allergies or ethical concerns, but hypromellose phthalate sidesteps this. But there’s no silver bullet; raw material shortages and rising costs twist the supply chain, pushing up production budgets. Pharmaceutical quality standards keep jumping higher, which means companies need to double and triple check the purity and performance of each batch.
Training and careful selection matter. Manufacturers have to pick not just the right grade of hypromellose phthalate, but also make sure every other part of the process—from blending to coating machines—lines up right. Systematic checks through United States Pharmacopeia, British Pharmacopoeia, and European Pharmacopoeia guidelines help make sure the ingredient’s right for the job. If the supply chain buckles, patients will start seeing out-of-stock notices at the pharmacy, or get medicines that no longer work as well because companies switched to a second-choice coating.
Smart investment into process control, regular supplier audits, and better communication with those in the distribution line are practical steps. Having seen firsthand how a single misstep can pull hundreds of products off the shelf, it’s clear these coatings do more than keep a pill pretty. They keep it working as promised, every single day.
Visit any pharmaceutical site and you’ll spot hypromellose phthalate on the excipient list for a range of tablets and capsules. Folks in drug development choose it for a reason: the polymer coats oral dosage forms, keeping active ingredients safe from stomach acid. Protection under harsh gastric conditions matters, especially for drugs that break down in acid or lose effect before hitting the intestine.
Ask around manufacturing plants or analytical labs, and the requirements sound similar, whether you’re in the UK, Europe, or the US. Pharmacopeias have their quirks, but the message rings clear—purity, safety, and consistency sit front and center.
Each pharmacopeia—British (BP), European (EP), and United States (USP)—lays out detailed standards. Water content has to stay below set levels, generally under 5%. Pharmacies and factories use the Karl Fischer method to keep an eye on that. Residual solvents can’t go over certain traces: methanol, ethanol, and acetone show up as the most common, and modern labs won’t let these remain above parts-per-million levels.
Identification checks get strict. Spectroscopic signatures, viscosity readings, and chemical spot tests stand as gatekeepers. Purity testing looks for phthalic anhydride or methyl/fatty acid residues lingering from the polymer’s production. Hydrolytic resistance—the stuff that tells how well it shields what’s inside the capsule—gets checked using simulated gastric fluids.
Viscosity plays a practical role. Pharmacopeias list a range (commonly 5–100 mPa·s for a 1% solution). Stepping outside that range leads to unpredictable coating or handling problems. Some manufacturers ask for custom viscosities because a tablet press can’t handle goopy or runny mixtures.
Testing for heavy metals, arsenic, and related impurities follows global safety pushes. The BP, EP, and USP cap these as low as current testing science can measure—usually less than 10 ppm. Uniform particle size also matters; clumping can turn a coating line into a nightmare.
Raw material buyers tell the story best—one bad lot of hypromellose phthalate can stop production lines and waste thousands of dollars. Inconsistent batches break trust between ingredient makers and medicine manufacturers. That’s why every drum and bag comes with a certificate detailing each test performed and result found.
These standards don’t just make life harder; they keep patients safe and give peace of mind to pharmacists. Consider that some drug users—children, the elderly, people with chronic diseases—rely on medicines for daily wellness. Any shift in polymer properties could mean a missed dose or, worse, harmful side effects from dissolved drug pieces too early in the stomach.
Factories tackle these challenges with real-time monitoring and tighter supplier audits. Rather than waiting for shipments to arrive before testing, some plants use near-infrared scanners and automated sampling to flag problems at the gate. Suppliers who keep investing in better purification and smarter synthesis methods gradually stand apart. They usually ship more consistent products and face fewer complaints.
Sharing best practices across countries and companies grows reliability. The fight for stronger standards shouldn’t fall to one region or company. If everyone backs stricter methods, recalls shrink, supply chains run smoother, and patients trust pills from the pharmacy shelf.
Good hypromellose phthalate isn’t just about chemistry and paperwork—it’s about real-world reliability, constant vigilance, and a shared mission to put safe, predictable medicine into people’s hands.
If you've ever looked at the ingredients on your medication, you might have seen a long, scientific name like hypromellose phthalate. It's a mouthful, but this ingredient often plays a key role in how pills deliver active ingredients where they need to go. Many pharmaceutical companies turn to it for its reliable coating properties. They rely on it for enteric coatings, which basically shield certain drugs from stomach acids and help them reach the intestines intact.
For those of us who depend on daily medication, safety isn’t just a buzzword. It’s pretty normal to worry about things you can’t even pronounce, never mind explain. Years ago, I remember watching my father ask the pharmacist about every new medication he tried—especially after a bad allergic reaction to an over-the-counter painkiller. He wanted answers, not just from a leaflet, but from someone with training. The pharmacist pointed out that inactive ingredients are tested for years before approval, and some, like hypromellose phthalate, show a long track record in many tablets and capsules.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration checks substances like hypromellose phthalate before folks ever see them in their medicine cabinets. Extensive research over decades supports its use. Scientific studies back up its low toxicity, with tolerance backed up at much higher doses than people would normally encounter. Some animal tests helped researchers understand things like metabolism and breakdown, and all signs pointed in the right direction. Findings show that it passes through the digestive system mostly unchanged, pulling little attention from the body’s chemistry and rarely causing allergic reactions.
Concerns sometimes get louder when scientific names sound mysterious, especially when stories pop up online lumping all “phthalates” together. Worth noting: unlike certain phthalates found in plastics, hypromellose phthalate doesn’t share the same risks. Researchers have isolated its use and studied it separately to address confusion. So far, published clinical data and regulatory agencies agree that the compound’s profile stands apart from the more notorious plasticizers, which sometimes show hormone-like effects in animal tests.
Obviously, no chemical ingredient should play a guessing game with public health. Pharmaceutical manufacturers have to run every batch through tough quality control, checking for impurities and making sure no cross-contamination happens. Auditors visit labs and factories, and regulatory officials audit records. If any red flag pops up, approval can be pulled before products hit the shelves. Sitting through an audit in my early days of working in manufacturing, I watched how closely quality officers check ingredient sourcing and trace every shipment back to its original lot number.
Pharmacies and healthcare staff should still pay attention to reports from patients. In the rare event that someone has a reaction, documenting details helps improve safety practices. Trust builds not just on research, but through openness, shared experiences, and listening to customers who face real-world conditions every day. Access to safety data should stay in the spotlight, and conversations between patients and medical professionals deserve time and attention.
Transparency matters. If scientists uncover new risks—however small—publishers need to get that information out, and doctors need clarity when talking with patients. If someone has a rare sensitivity or allergy, alternatives should always be available. By keeping manufacturing standards high, providing robust post-market surveillance, and making sure people share information about possible side effects, the pharmaceutical world can protect trust and keep medications as safe as possible. It’s real people, not just abstract science, who count on these decisions every day.
Walk into any pharmaceutical lab, and the names and acronyms on ingredient lists can sound confusing to newcomers. Hypromellose phthalate, often called HPMCP, turns up fairly often, especially in tablets and capsules that shouldn’t dissolve right away. It acts as an enteric coating. Meaning: it helps pills survive harsh stomach acid, waiting to release the medicine further along the digestive tract. This sounds simple, but getting the dose right is a mix of chemistry, biology, and years of trial and error.
Dose selection for HPMCP usually falls somewhere between 5% and 10% of the total tablet or capsule coating. Look through published research or product specs, and this number pops up again and again. Too little, and the drug might leak or dissolve in the stomach, losing its intended effect. Too much, and you can get a coating tougher than it needs to be, making the pill break down too slowly later on.
Pharmacists and scientists don’t just pick a number out of thin air. Years ago, I worked alongside a team developing a coated tablet for a diabetes drug. Early batches either dissolved too soon or not at all. We kept adjusting the percentage of HPMCP in the coating – 3%, 6%, then 9%. Each shift forced us to run more tests. Eventually, just north of 7% gave us a reliable barrier without drawing out the medicine release past what doctors recommended.
Patients won’t think about phthalates, but companies and regulators certainly do. FDA and EMA want evidence that pills work reliably every time, not just in the lab. Too little HPMCP risks loss of drug potency in stomach acid, leading to failed clinical outcomes. On the flip side, an overly thick enteric coating can mean people absorb less active drug—sometimes not enough to treat their condition. Everyone has a story about a medicine that just didn’t seem to work the way it should. Sometimes, tiny variations in excipient levels turn out to be the culprit.
Research published in the International Journal of Pharmaceutics backs up field experience: tablets with HPMCP coatings in the 5%-10% range show predictable dissolution in the small intestine while resisting breakdown in acidic environments. Even seasoned professionals learn the hard way that doing things “by the book” is often more about hours spent in the lab and careful observation than textbook rules.
Tweaking the HPMCP level doesn’t solve everything. Humidity, coating technique, even the shape of the pill itself can affect how well the coating sticks and performs. In my old lab, small tweaks to the spraying equipment changed drug release timing as much as a 2% shift in HPMCP concentration. It all demanded constant quality checks. Scientists now lean toward real-time analytics—tools that monitor coating thickness and breakdown in simulated acid or intestine juice to avoid expensive failures later on.
Some teams are exploring new phthalate-free alternatives. But even now, HPMCP holds a spot in hundreds of approved medicines, a testament to its reliability when handled carefully. Going forward, keeping the science transparent and doing more head-to-head trials of enteric coatings would help everyone, from patients to prescribers to the folks mixing each batch.
Working with pharmaceutical ingredients has always forced me to blend careful planning with common sense. Hypromellose phthalate, often called HPMCP, sits on the shelf for many labs and manufacturers who want a dependable enteric coating for tablets and capsules. In my time around both big plants and small research setups, I’ve watched people make simple mistakes that end up costing time—and sometimes, product. Respecting the substance, not just following protocols out of habit, actually pays off.
I never found shortcuts with storage. HPMCP comes in powder or granular form and it’s not picky about a few degrees, but shifts in temperature and humidity always cause trouble. At room temperature, ideally below 25°C, it keeps its integrity. I remember one warehouse manager bragging about energy savings by letting temperatures creep up. Several months later, we opened a bag that had picked up clumps and a strange odor—clearly, moisture had found its way in. Humidity invites caking, changes in flow properties, and sometimes even microbial contamination.
A dedicated, dry, cool area—free from direct sunlight and away from strong-smelling chemicals like acids or solvents—makes sense. I still picture a project years ago, where a rusty drum of ammonia sat right next to our polymer stock. It doesn’t take much for volatile fumes to spoil a batch. Keeping storage areas clean isn’t glamorous, but swept floors and quick response to spills really do stop cross-contamination before it starts.
Handling starts with good habits and gear. Gloves, goggles, and standard dust masks come out before the container opens. This isn’t just about the rules—it’s about avoiding sticky skin and dust in your eyes. Hypromellose phthalate is not acutely toxic, but breathing dust over a shift gets unpleasant quickly. One slip with a scoop or a gust from the HVAC can send powders flying. Keeping the workspace ventilated and using a fume hood during large-scale transfers cuts down risk.
Most of the issues I’ve seen stem from rushing—open bags left in humid air, or people scooping from one bag to another without resealing. Once moisture sneaks in, hard lumps ruin the flow for both manual dosing and automated feeders. I push for closing original bags tightly, storing them upright on pallets, and labeling every container with date and lot number. These habits sound simple, but in the middle of a busy production run, good systems keep mistakes from multiplying.
Hypromellose phthalate supports the release profile of finished drugs, protecting APIs from acid and giving patients a safe product. Even tiny breakdowns in handling can ripple out through an entire supply chain. Every reputable manufacturer tracks material batches closely, runs periodic inspections on storage spaces, and trains workers as processes change. Skipping these steps invites recalls, customer complaints, and regulatory headaches.
Nobody wants to toss out inventory or watch the bottom line shrink because a little extra moisture crept in. Sticking to well-lit, dry, clean storage, and building careful routines for handling isn’t about making life difficult. It’s about respecting the science, keeping things honest, and, ultimately, delivering medicines that work as promised. For me, that’s a standard worth holding up in any lab or warehouse.
Names | |
Preferred IUPAC name | 2-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate |
Other names |
HPMCP Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Phthalate Cellulose, 2-hydroxypropyl methyl ether, phthalic acid ester Phthalylated Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose |
Pronunciation | /haɪˌproʊˈmɛl.oʊs ˈfθæ.leɪt/ |
Identifiers | |
CAS Number | 9050-31-1 |
Beilstein Reference | 1318004 |
ChEBI | CHEBI:53497 |
ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201711 |
ChemSpider | 158386 |
DrugBank | DB08813 |
ECHA InfoCard | 07b5e88a-d922-429f-a672-ecadbe114b2e |
EC Number | 9032-78-4 |
Gmelin Reference | 71590 |
KEGG | C11746 |
MeSH | Cellulose, Mixed Esters |
PubChem CID | 24773 |
RTECS number | TY2275000 |
UNII | G63H201P5B |
UN number | UN3077 |
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | CompTox Dashboard (EPA) of product 'Hypromellose Phthalate BP EP USP Pharma Grade' is **DTXSID4014471** |
Properties | |
Chemical formula | C40H54O19 |
Molar mass | 86000 g/mol |
Appearance | White or almost white, granular or flaky powder |
Odor | Odorless |
Density | 1.28 g/cm³ |
Solubility in water | Practically insoluble in water |
log P | -2.0 |
Vapor pressure | Negligible |
Acidity (pKa) | 5.0 |
Basicity (pKb) | 8.4 |
Refractive index (nD) | 1.474 |
Viscosity | 400 cP |
Dipole moment | 2.7 D |
Pharmacology | |
ATC code | A07BC |
Hazards | |
Main hazards | May cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation. |
GHS labelling | GHS labelling: Not classified as a hazardous substance or mixture according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). |
Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07 |
Signal word | No signal word. |
Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
Precautionary statements | Precautionary Statements: P261, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313, P501 |
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | NFPA 704: 1-1-0 |
Autoignition temperature | 410°C |
LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >5 g/kg (rat, oral) |
NIOSH | Not listed |
PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/m³ |
Related compounds | |
Related compounds |
Cellulose Acetate Phthalate Polyvinyl Acetate Phthalate Methacrylic Acid Copolymers Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (Hypromellose) Cellulose Acetate Ethylcellulose |