Leucine landed on the map in 1819, isolated by French chemist Joseph Proust from cheese. For decades, researchers thought of it as just another building block for proteins. By the 20th century, the field grew more curious. Biochemistry labs in Europe and North America worked to purify, analyze, and test amino acids in everything from wheat gluten to muscle. Science in the mid-twentieth century finally pieced together how leucine impacts cell growth, metabolism, and muscle maintenance. Innovations in fermentation and synthesis soon followed. Demand for pharmaceutical purity set a new bar in the late 1970s. Leucine’s story unfolded from farmhouse cheese to the clean rooms of pharmaceutical plants. Along the way, the standards that defined “pharma grade” rose, pressed forward by regulators, industry feedback, and advances in analytic chemistry. Modern pharma leucine traces its roots to that journey—science chasing after purity and consistency, always heading to a safer, more reliable product.
Leucine, one of the essential amino acids, means nobody’s body can make it from scratch. It must come from diet or, in the pharma world, tightly monitored laboratory production. In tablet pressing or nutritional supplement blends, pharmaceutical-grade leucine stands out thanks to its tight purity thresholds. Suppliers produce leucine under standards like BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia), responding to the different demands of regions and regulatory quirks. Unlike technical or food grades, pharma grade keeps impurities and microbial contamination at their lowest. The result: leucine suitable for injection, infusion, or direct human use. Supply chains leading up to the pharmacy shelf rely on these grades to prevent tiny contaminants from slipping through. Years in pharmaceutical manufacturing taught me how even one out-of-place element in an excipient or active ingredient can trigger entire batch recalls or patient risk. That’s why pharma companies and regulatory auditors keep leucine’s paperwork and certificates as closely watched as its molecular fingerprint.
Pure leucine appears as a white, crystalline powder. It feels gritty between the fingers, resists dissolving in cold water but goes in more easily in hot. Smelling nearly nothing, tasting slightly bitter, it’s identified chemically as C6H13NO2, with a molecular weight of 131.17 g/mol. Leucine won’t melt until heated past 293°C, telling you a lot about how stable it holds in hot formulation blending. It changes little under normal humidity. Under the microscope, the crystal structure reveals slender needles or plates, a layout that matters for flowability in tablet compression lines. Pharma processors favor leucine for its stability in stored mixes; it doesn’t go rancid or break down fast, even in the harsh environments of automated facilities or multi-week international shipping. This stability improves reliability down the pharmacy chain. In more technical labs, optical rotation tests, pH checks (5.5 to 7.0 for a 2% solution), and heavy metal tests confirm a batch’s quality, not just for compliance but for protecting patients who rely on sterile infusions and balanced enteral feeds.
Specifications for pharma grade leucine follow long tables laid out by BP, EP, and USP monographs. Purity turns out above 98.5%, with close management of isoleucine and valine—related amino acids that can sneak through in lesser grades. Heavy metals, including lead and arsenic, must land below 10 parts per million, almost disappearing by modern lab detection. Each certificate of analysis includes identity by IR and HPLC, loss on drying (always below 0.2%), and residue on ignition metrics. Batches get assigned lot numbers, manufacturing dates, retest periods, and proper storage guidelines—often “store in a cool, dry place, well-sealed.” Beyond the label, experience teaches to check for compliance with allergens (wheat, soy) or animal-derived risks, especially in European or Halal-sensitive markets. Modern labeling also details the manufacturing location and contact for reporting adverse events, demanded more by regulators every year. Companies ignore these details at the risk of blocked shipments or legal headaches.
The path from raw ingredient to pharma leucine starts with choice of substrate. Fermentation dominates, using strains of Corynebacterium or Escherichia coli, heavily genetically tuned for high L-leucine yield. These bugs munch on carbohydrate feeds, push out leucine, and after several days, fermentation broth is separated and purified. Most processes rely on deep filtration, resin exchange, and multiple crystallizations, stripping away byproducts and colorants until what’s left is white, nearly spotless powder. Alternatively, chemical synthesis routes exist—using Strecker degradation or alkylation of acetoacetic esters—but costs run higher. Fermentation wins for efficiency and greener waste streams. From factory tours and process audits, tight process controls are needed, especially to check for biogenic amines and endotoxins. Gaps in any step, from tank sterilization to crystallizer operation, show fast in final purity, and even a small slip can grind a whole campaign to a halt. People in this field learn quickly not to rush a cleanroom or skimp on post-process washing steps.
Leucine behaves as an amino acid: reacts with ninhydrin to turn a deep blue. Most modifications target the amino or carboxyl group on the molecule. Chemists can turn leucine into its methyl or ethyl esters for research, measuring transport across membranes, or tuning flavor profiles. Derivatization allows its attachment to fluorescent tags for peptide sequencing or protein research. In pharma, protected forms like Boc- or Fmoc-leucine find frequent use for stepwise peptide synthesis. The plain form, though, is what ends up in human infusion or as a protein supplement additive. Leucine stands resistant to simple base or acid hydrolysis, tolerates handling in most neutral buffers, and doesn’t racemize under most storage conditions. Batch to batch, formulas hold true, avoiding the wild variability that haunts older natural extracts. The science benefits, but so does safety: nobody has time for surprise side-products ending up unannounced in a patient’s solution.
Leucine answers to many labels in the scientific world: L-Leucine, (S)-2-amino-4-methylpentanoic acid, Leu. Trade names vary by company and country—some sell it under old names like “NSC 565” or “Kyowa Leucine.” The common denominator stays the same: in nutritional, pharma, or food mixes, look for “L-Leucine USP/EP/BP.” Less common in Europe but still found in catalogs: “AjiLeu” or “PharmaLeu.” On technical sheets or safety paperwork, the key is always the L- form, separated from the mirror-image D-leucine, which doesn’t share the same biological effects. Accurate naming prevents disastrous mistakes, especially in global procurement chains dancing through language and regulation issues.
Leucine, like most amino acids, wears a low-toxicity badge when handled properly. Safety data highlight dust inhalation risk in production: masks and dust control prevent the sort of fine powder clouds that give workers headaches or mild respiratory irritation. Manufacturing spaces with proper airflow and sealed containment almost erase those risks. Packaging crews learn to sweep, not blow away, spills. Bundled with standard macrosafety protocols—clean PPE, strict cleaning regimens, clear labeling—leucine gets through the chain safely. Flammability concerns lag behind those of real organics or solvents; the main severe risk comes in mishandled blends where incompatible materials mix unbeknownst to staff. In my time on the production floor, best-run plants work from standard operating procedures checked and signed weekly—nobody leaves jobsite safety to improvisation. For storage and shipping, leucine rides best in paper-lined fiber drums or HDPE containers, sealed against moisture and pests. Improper storage can draw in enough water to clump, reducing flow and proper dosing, ultimately threatening batch quality at the end user.
Leucine lives at the heart of both medical and nutrition industries. Intravenous leucine provides essential nitrogen in parenteral nutrition mixes, supporting recovery in patients unable to eat. Bright white tablets and capsules, found in supplements, depend on pharma grade for blending purity and stability over long shelf life. In sports nutrition, leucine’s role escalates: doses tuned to spark muscle protein synthesis appeal to bodybuilders and rehab patients alike. Hospitals measure leucine infusions down to the milligram for children with metabolic disorders or adults with severe burns. In biotech, peptide therapeutics draw on bulk leucine for solid-phase synthesis, extending down to research teams mapping cell signaling with isotope-labeled materials. From supplement jars to IV drips, the same grade traces upstream to the same origin, reinforcing why so much auditing and process control follows every batch.
Research teams keep finding new corners to explore. Leucine draws attention for its role in mTOR pathway signaling, regulating everything from fasting response to cell cycle control. Metabolic disorder therapies, especially rare genetic conditions like maple syrup urine disease, push innovation in both diagnostic and treatment forms. Radiolabeled leucine opens windows to amino acid uptake studies in tumor biology or malnutrition. In recent years, pharmaceutical companies wield site-specific modifications to explore novel peptides, tuning release profiles or optimizing uptake. Every new clinical trial or hospital protocol revision brings another layer of regulatory scrutiny. Trends in plant-based or vegan-friendly pharmaceuticals also touch leucine’s world; R&D groups search for cleaner fermentation alternatives and animal-free certification for global markets. Advances in fermentation, purification, and formulation offer safer, cheaper, and more versatile leucine for the medicine cabinet of tomorrow.
At regular doses, leucine gets a clean record. Multiple animal studies and human trial reviews show no evidence for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or reproductive toxicity. Too much of a good thing, though, tips over into imbalance. Massive doses, far beyond nutritional recommendations, may upset plasma concentrations of other branched-chain amino acids (BCAA), breaking careful metabolic balances in the brain and liver. Some data suggest that sky-high supplemental intakes could provoke hypoglycemia or impair vitamin B6 metabolism in unhealthy populations. Pharma grade leucine, dosed by healthcare professionals and backed up by full traceability, avoids these pitfall risks in seriously ill or vulnerable patients. Quality control models in this space keep track of even the rarest adverse event signals, especially in vulnerable populations—something only robust, long-term toxicity research can guarantee. New packets of safety data drive updates in regulatory monographs, retooling global standards for patient protection.
Leucine’s future looks set for growth as biotechnologies expand. Cell-based therapies, new nutraceutical trends, and fine-tuned amino acid blends all ride on a backbone of reliable supply. Process improvements, from green chemistry fermentation to water-saving purification methods, stand to cut environmental impact, driving up both quality and production efficiency. Regulatory harmonization—sharing specifications across EU, US, and Asian markets—could someday lower manufacturing and approval costs, smoothing global trade. Personalized medicine, including therapeutic protein shakes for rare disorders or population-targeted amino acid blends, will call for even tighter analytical controls and innovative documentation platforms. As oral, topical, and injectable peptide therapies advance, leucine’s reputation as a reliable, well-researched ingredient will only get stronger. Still, keeping the supply chain robust, affordable, and safe stays an endless focus—regulatory surprises or raw material shocks can still trip up even the best-prepared manufacturers. Every improvement in production, analysis, or documentation pays off for patients in clinics or families at kitchen tables around the world.
Step into any pharmacy, supplement store or even your neighborhood gym, and someone’s raving about leucine. Most people recognize it as something tied to protein and muscle recovery, but pharma-grade leucine like BP EP USP tells another story worth attention—especially amongst folks who care about what goes into medicine and health products. It takes purity and safety to a different level, and while most headlines chase trendier chemicals, leucine wins quiet respect among industry professionals who spend years making sure you get only what you need in a tablet.
Leucine belongs to the family of amino acids, which the body can’t manufacture on its own. Protein-rich foods bring it to the table for most people, but pharmaceutical applications won’t settle for “good enough.” The labels BP, EP, and USP stand for three big sets of standards: British Pharmacopoeia, European Pharmacopoeia and United States Pharmacopeia. If something carries these marks, it’s been held to rules that mean every batch sits at peak purity—so low contamination risk, no mystery residues, and real consistency.
Think about it: When you need an antibiotic, want a vitamin tablet, or rely on a medical food, there’s no room for question marks. With leucine pharma grade, anyone involved in health—from quality control officers at factories to doctors in hospitals—expects a product that won’t trigger allergic reactions from hidden byproducts and won’t surprise you with unpredictable ingredients.
During my years collaborating with pharmacists and regulatory experts, I’ve seen firsthand how strict sourcing and testing of raw materials prevent a lot of headaches. Imagine a headache pill with hidden contaminants causing reactions or reducing the effectiveness of the medication. High grade leucine acts as a quietly reliable team player—prescribers and patients know what they’re getting, every single time.
The people who make tablets, capsules or intravenous feeds count on consistent leucine to help mix, bind and stabilize formulas. Lousy grade amino acids might lower costs, but your safety ends up at risk. Pharma-grade leucine guarantees there’s no batch-to-batch guessing game. The result—better health outcomes, less risk, and fewer recalls for everyone down the line.
Leucine does the obvious heavy lifting for muscle growth in supplements, but its real magic in pharmacy comes from two fronts. First, it acts as an active ingredient in medical nutrition, especially important for people with muscle-wasting illnesses, elderly patients, or surgical recovery. Second—and often quietly—it serves as an excipient. Excipients look like background players in medicine manufacturing, yet they determine if tablets hold together, if a powder flows smoothly, or if a medicine gets absorbed in your system the right way.
Imagine a cancer patient with muscle loss or someone recovering from major burns. Medical-grade leucine lets healthcare professionals craft nutrition therapies that rebuild tissue. At the same time, tablet manufacturers rely on it to make sure the active ingredient makes it safely into your system, without breaking apart before it should or failing to dissolve inside the stomach.
The pharmaceutical industry’s reputation lives and dies by its supply chain. Sourcing pharma-grade leucine means more upfront paperwork, more documentation, more tests at every step—from soil or fermentation tank all the way to packaged product. Yet whenever a safety scare breaks out, the companies who cut corners on raw materials pay a much steeper price, both in lawsuits and in trust lost.
I’ve seen industry groups call for even tighter oversight on amino acid supply, pushing for transparent source tracking, and public results for every major batch. That’s time well spent. In health, knowing what you’re putting in your body saves lives, and the extra vigilance is worth it for patient peace of mind—and for product makers who’d rather get it right than apologize after the fact.
Leucine might sound like a buzzword reserved for fitness supplements, but its role in medicine is much bigger. In pharmaceutical circles, Leucine labeled as BP, EP, or USP grade isn’t just pure—it’s put through serious tests. BP stands for British Pharmacopoeia, EP for European Pharmacopoeia, and USP for United States Pharmacopeia. If a batch of Leucine holds one of these labels, it’s been checked for things like contaminants, heavy metals, and microbes. People expect medicine to be safe and consistent. If a company picks pharma grade Leucine, they’re not guessing about what’s inside their tablets or capsules—they know.
Patients deserve trust in every pill. Pharma grade isn’t fancy branding. Testing rules are strict. For instance, USP sets a purity minimum—often 98.5% or higher. Stepping outside those lines, you’re dealing with unknowns. Some folks might think any form of Leucine will do, but in medicine, chemical impurities stack up to patient risk. A 2021 study in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences traced adverse reactions in poorly regulated amino acid lots to trace-level toxins. Pharma grade Leucine means lower risk, a reality for immune-compromised or pediatric patients.
Manufacturers count on predictable performance from every ingredient. Tablets have quotas for stability and shelf life, and excipients like Leucine can act as small details holding bigger products together. In direct compression tablets, Leucine helps by improving powder flow. Pharma grade versions behave in a predictable, repeatable way under pressure—batch after batch. It’s not about fancy specs; it’s about pharmacists and technicians knowing what their raw materials will do.
Recalls aren’t rare; they’re expensive and erode trust. Transparency in supply chains has become a hot topic since the COVID era, when counterfeit and substandard pharmaceuticals flooded the market. Pharma grade Leucine suppliers keep paperwork—batch records, analytical certifications. These documents help trace problems to their source before products ever reach a patient’s hand.
Chemists often notice wide variability in industrial-grade Leucine. Testing in my own lab once revealed three different non-pharma Leucine powders from the same retailer with wildly different moisture contents—which can ruin a batch of pills. Skipping pharma grade specs, a company risks mold contamination, heavy metal uptick, or just plain inconsistency. For drugs needing FDA or EMA green lights, that turns into production stoppages and legal issues.
Medicine is a trust business. Companies pay a premium for pharma grade Leucine because recalls can cost millions and damage reputations. From generics made in India, to bespoke oral therapies in the US, assurance of ingredient quality shields both businesses and consumers from the costs of failure.
Pharma firms should invest in supplier audits, not just check certificates. In-house testing keeps vendors honest. Investment in partnerships with reliable manufacturers is forward-thinking; it reduces the risk of supply interruption during global disruptions. For governments and regulators, stepping up enforcement and updating pharmacopeia guidelines keeps the bar high—not just for fancy new drugs, but also for humbler ingredients like Leucine.
Anyone with a background in pharmaceutical science or clinical nutrition knows how important it is to source the right quality of raw materials. Leucine, a branched-chain amino acid, sits at the crossroads of food, pharma, and supplement industries. I remember working in a facility that supplied ingredients for IV mixtures – the emphasis on batch consistency and purity for every supply of Leucine was relentless. The risk of contamination, even at trace levels, could be the entire difference between a product passing QA or being recalled.
Leucine with BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), or USP (United States Pharmacopeia) grade goes through intense scrutiny. The monographs for each pharmacopoeia demand proof of identity through IR absorption, controls on melting point (most set between 293°C and 295°C), solubility in water, and absence of foreign amino acids. Impurities, such as other amino acids and heavy metals, see tight limits—typically with heavy metals under 10 ppm and arsenic capped at 1 ppm. Microbial controls ban pathogenic organisms, especially when the amino acid is destined for parenteral formulations or enteral nutrition.
Loss on drying is another well-watched parameter. The normal range stays below 0.3%, which helps to assure the amino acid does not pick up environmental moisture. Take the pH test—a real stress point in any analysis laboratory. Leucine solutions should hit a pH between 5.5 and 7.0, making the compound compatible with physiological conditions.
Purity for pharma-grade Leucine often reads above 98.5% on the label. In practice, batches usually clock in closer to 99.0% or higher. Walking the production floor, it’s not rare to see certificates of analysis that list 99.2-99.4% content by HPLC, which beats the pharmacopoeia's bare minimums. That's not just a legal tick-box — it translates directly to safer products and reliable dosing for patients.
Specific optical rotation ranges from +14.5° to +17.5°, which indicates the presence of the right isomer (L-leucine), critical in biological activity. Any deviation tells you contamination, racemization, or synthetic errors have crept in. In every QC report I've seen, this figure stays tightly monitored.
Markets pushing for stricter safety force manufacturers to back every specification with traceable batch data and certificates. Even minor contaminants, like lead or mercury, can trigger alarms. I've witnessed a batch withheld and destroyed because it came in just above the limit for an obscure impurity, saving a downstream food manufacturer from a PR disaster.
Controlling for purity and adhering to BP, EP, or USP specs isn't just box-ticking: the downstream patients, whether cystic fibrosis patients using medical nutrition, or people recovering from surgery, rely on every gram performing its function. Close monitoring, validated supply chains, and transparent documentation all add up to real-world protection.
Better testing labs, robust supplier audits, and advanced purification techniques give the industry hope for fewer recalls and higher safety margins. Smaller producers often struggle with this level of scrutiny, but larger pharma and nutrition manufacturers press the market toward cleaner, safer raw materials. Even end users now ask for proof of testing, showing how awareness has grown.
Experience shows that narrowing focus on purity and identity specification not only meets regulations, but keeps manufacturing teams proud to ship every drum and carton. Living up to the standards of BP, EP, and USP pays off in fewer surprises and lots more trust between manufacturer, clinician, and patient.
My years around pharmaceutical labs taught me one thing above all: the right way to store and handle raw materials decides the outcome. Leucine, a key amino acid graded for BP EP USP standards, matters to the stability and effectiveness of countless drug products. Throwing a drum of leucine into a corner shelf and hoping for the best is not an option. Mistakes here travel downstream, creating problems in manufacturing – and at worst, risking product recalls or patient safety.
Rooms that handle leucine can feel like miniature fortresses. Excessive heat shortens shelf life and degrades product quality. Moisture may seem harmless, but it clumps powders and invites chemical changes. Direct sunlight breaks down sensitive components. That’s why well-run facilities keep leucine in a cool, dry, and shaded environment, away from any direct heat sources and windows. I have seen companies lose entire batches due to a bathroom pipe leak or a careless worker leaving a sack in a sunbeam.
Every basket, drum, or container should stay sealed except during use. Tightly closed packaging shields leucine from ambient humidity and air, keeping the material pristine for cycles of quality control and further processing. This isn’t just for show; regulatory inspectors pay close attention to these storage details.
No one wants unexpected particles or cross-contamination in pharmaceutical production. Leucine must go into food-grade or pharma-approved containers: usually high-density polyethylene or stainless steel, chosen for their chemical resistance and ability to withstand repeated sanitation. Lids stay tight. Labels indicate product ID, batch number, and receiving date. I remember a QA auditor turning back a shipment because the batch code on the drum didn’t match the paperwork. Failures like that set production back days or more.
Temperature loggers and humidity sensors belong in every serious storage zone. Pharmacopeial guidelines, plus good manufacturing practice, call for regular checks and logged results. Alarms or automated messages help catch problems before batches spoil. I’ve seen teams try to cut corners by hanging thermometers on the wall. That won’t fly once an auditor checks the history and finds no records before a sudden temperature spike.
Direct skin contact or inhalation of powdered leucine poses low but real risks. Gloves, masks, and lab coats cost little and prevent accidental exposure—plus, they keep sweat or oils from workers out of finished lots. Don’t forget routine hand washing and clear signage reminding anyone on the floor about good handling practices. It’s better to replace a set of gloves than lose a valuable batch to careless touching.
Cleanliness extends past the bench. Spills happen, but cleaning protocols with approved detergents and proper waste bins stop material from entering drains or dusting into the air. Regular training drills help teams know exactly what to do in a crisis and keep costly mishaps rare. In my experience, the companies that practice emergencies have fewer real ones.
Treating leucine storage and handling with respect saves money, time, and reputations. Each step—cool, dry rooms, tight controls, vigilant staff—protects patients and manufacturing goals alike.
Anyone searching for pharmaceutical or nutraceutical ingredients knows that paperwork matters as much as product quality. With a substance like Leucine, which finds its way into everything from injection solutions to sports supplements, reliability depends not just on purity but on clear documentation. In real-world manufacturing, paperwork delays can halt production, and lack of transparency can lead to recalls.
Reputable suppliers produce Leucine that aligns with BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia) standards. These monographs lay out the expected qualities—identity, purity, and allowable impurities—so that everyone’s speaking the same language. Having seen batch records for a pharmaceutical line, it’s obvious why buyers ask for more than just a material safety data sheet. Managers and quality control teams expect full documentation as proof that the powder in the drum matches those strict rules.
Sourcing teams ask for a Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for every delivered batch. This CoA details the lot’s test results, showing levels like arsenic or heavy metals meet regulations. GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) certificates also play a huge role in showing the facility runs under validated procedures. Some buyers insist on a TSE/BSE declaration to keep products free from animal-derived contamination, which is no small deal for parenteral drug manufacturers or vegan supplement makers.
I’ve seen cases where a purchase gets stuck because a supplier can’t show a current GMP certificate. Regulatory authorities demand full traceability from raw materials up to finished product distribution. Suppliers should freely provide ISO certificates, confirming broader quality control, or answer detailed questionnaires from multinational buyers. If the product crosses borders, importers may request a Drug Master File (DMF) or other regulatory filings that outline the entire supply chain’s control points.
Having a product that’s labeled BP, EP, or USP-compliant doesn’t mean much if the paperwork trails off halfway. Regulations in the EU, US, and most developed markets carry real teeth, and inspectors dig deep into documentation. I’ve witnessed companies pass on a lower-cost supplier because the chain of paperwork failed. Even one missing signature on a Certificate of Origin can send a shipment back, causing far more trouble than the price tag on a drum.
Trust is built on the smallest details—batch numbers, storage conditions, shelf-life studies. GMP and ISO certificates give buyers peace of mind, but they also encourage accountability. Quality agreements give all parties a written record of expectations, from microbial limits to proper labeling. This isn’t just about red tape; every failed audit or recall starts with overlooked documentation.
Companies improve reliability by building long-term relationships with suppliers who treat certifications as living documents, not boxes to check. Regular audits, clear lines of communication, and consistent third-party testing create layers of safety. Some firms join supplier qualification programs or industry networks to share best practices. In my experience, transparency up front saves huge headaches down the road. Once you’ve faced regulatory questions about a single missing page, you’ll never skimp on document requests again.
Document trails don’t just support compliance; they help teams sleep at night knowing patients and end-users stay safe. Taking certifications seriously leads to fewer surprises, faster customs clearance, and a much smoother path for any pharmaceutical ingredient—Leucine included.
Names | |
Preferred IUPAC name | 2-Amino-4-methylpentanoic acid |
Other names |
2-Amino-4-methylpentanoic acid L-Leucine H-Leucine Leu |
Pronunciation | /ˈluːsiːn biː piː iː piː juː ɛs piː ˈfɑːmə ɡreɪd/ |
Identifiers | |
CAS Number | 61-90-5 |
Beilstein Reference | 0291 |
ChEBI | CHEBI:25017 |
ChEMBL | CHEMBL: CHEMBL12324 |
ChemSpider | 595 |
DrugBank | DB00148 |
ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100.006.232 |
EC Number | 63-68-3 |
Gmelin Reference | 3555 |
KEGG | C00123 |
MeSH | D-Leucine |
PubChem CID | 6106 |
RTECS number | OJ6305000 |
UNII | F7V2LO29P7 |
UN number | UN1230 |
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID4020736 |
Properties | |
Chemical formula | C6H13NO2 |
Molar mass | 131.17 g/mol |
Appearance | White crystalline powder |
Odor | Odorless |
Density | 0.93 g/cm3 |
Solubility in water | Slightly soluble in water |
log P | -1.68 |
Acidity (pKa) | 2.36 |
Basicity (pKb) | 2.36 |
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -8.9 × 10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
Dipole moment | 0.0 D |
Thermochemistry | |
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | '205.0 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹' |
Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -537.9 kJ/mol |
Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | −3616 kJ/mol |
Pharmacology | |
ATC code | A11AA02 |
Hazards | |
GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
Precautionary statements | P264, P270, P273, P301+P312, P330, P501 |
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
Flash point | 213°C |
Autoignition temperature | 410°C |
Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 oral rat 5000 mg/kg |
LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 12,600 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
PEL (Permissible) | 10 mg/m³ |
REL (Recommended) | 1,000 mg |
IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
Related compounds | |
Related compounds |
Isoleucine Valine Norleucine Methionine Histidine |