Meglumine didn’t just appear in the back room of a chemistry lab. Its journey stretches deep into the legacy of early pharmaceutical science, riding on the back of discoveries where biochemistry met therapy. Early chemists looked for ways to stabilize and deliver sensitive drugs more effectively, running into problems with solubility and compatibility. Meglumine, a simple amino sugar derivative, provided a workaround, entered pharmaceutical textbooks, and earned a steady place in major pharmacopeias like BP, EP, and USP. Over the years, applications grew beyond basic drug stabilization, shaped by researchers who understood that drug formulation could sometimes be as important as the active ingredient. Today’s production of Meglumine reflects decades of chemical innovation, regulatory scrutiny, and real-world patient use.
Look at a typical product label and you’ll see Meglumine billed as a pharmaceutical excipient. In practice, this means it gets mixed into injectable solutions, contrast media, and biological products. This compound often serves as a solubilizer to help more challenging drugs dissolve in water for intravenous or oral use, showing up in everything from radiographic contrast agents to veterinary medicines. Pharmaceutical-grade Meglumine ensures minimal impurities and verified consistency, responding to the serious regulatory hurdles that surround injectable and ingestible drugs. If you’ve worked in hospital or pharmacy prep, you know Meglumine’s reputation for reliability outpaces many lesser-tested excipients.
Visual inspection reveals a white, crystalline powder, fairly soluble in water, slightly sticky to the touch if humidity climbs. The chemical name is N-methylglucamine, with a structure that blends the features of a methyl group and glucose. Its molecular formula, C7H17NO5, and molecular weight of about 195.21 g/mol, put it in a comfortable range for safe pharmaceutical handling and blending. Meglumine dissolves efficiently in water, forming clear solutions. Unlike many excipients, it doesn’t introduce unwanted colors or odors—essential when purity could make or break a batch of intravenous medication. Melting point hovers between 128 to 132°C, and the compound remains stable when stored away from direct sunlight and excessive moisture. It tolerates autoclaving without significant breakdown, so sterile production remains straightforward and dependable.
Pharma grade Meglumine, whether under BP, EP, or USP standards, has to pass specific hurdles: purity must exceed 99%, loss on drying can’t spike above 1%, and levels of heavy metals fall well below 10 ppm. Organoleptic testing (appearance, odor, foreign matters) aligns with detailed pharmacopeial requirements. Manufacturers provide certificates of analysis, batch traceability, and all compliance paperwork. Product labeling marks out the grade (BP, EP, or USP), origin, lot number, expiry, and full composition. Storage instructions appear on every drum and sachet, warning against humidity and high temperatures to prevent caking or decomposition. Lab workers know a stray moisture sign or color shift signals a batch gone bad.
Meglumine comes from methylation of glucose, followed by amination. The typical process starts with glucose dissolved in water, with methylamine introduced under controlled pH and temperature. Purification relies on filtration, crystallization, and repeated washing to remove unreacted sugars, and the process steers clear of organic solvents whenever possible. Modern plants monitor every step with in-line sensors, watching for unplanned reactions or contamination. After purification, the finished crystals dry in vacuum dryers, not just to smooth transport but to preserve chemical integrity. The preparation doesn’t just have historical value; for many generic manufacturers, fine-tuning each step offers real price and regulatory advantages.
On a chemical level, Meglumine offers more than just a passive profile in combination drugs. The amino group remains available for salt formation, turning strong acids into manageable drug salts. This property improves the solubility and bioavailability of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Chemical modifications, for research purposes, sometimes attach labeling markers or cross-linkers, giving researchers a handle for tracing drug movement or adjusting pharmacokinetic behaviors. While not every pharmacist knows the chemistry at this level, the fact remains: Meglumine acts both as a helper in solubilization and a partner in chemical stabilization, and the pathways for further modification keep expanding.
On paperwork and MSDS sheets, Meglumine also answers to N-methyl-D-glucamine, and in global markets, synonyms like EINECS 205-618-1 surface. Product codes differ by region and supplier, with names like Glucamin, Meglumina, or methylglucamine popping up. Some manufacturers add proprietary identifiers, but the underlying compound stays the same. Healthcare workers across borders speak these synonyms interchangeably, especially in multinational clinical trials or global bulk API markets. This cross-recognition sometimes helps in supply shortages, allowing substitution without risking patient outcomes.
Safety data reflects extensive toxicological checks. Acute oral and dermal toxicity scores low in animal models, and adverse reactions typically tie back to the main drug rather than the excipient. Meglumine doesn’t bioaccumulate, limiting long-term risk. Still, production sites maintain strict air handling and PPE requirements: chemical dusts linger in the air easily, causing throat irritation or mild headaches if inhaled over time. GMP sites require staff to track every movement, not just for safety but to meet audit standards. Storage in tightly sealed containers, periodic quality checks, and reliable batch release testing keep safety issues in the background. Pharmacopeias spell out contamination limits and analytical tests. Regulators perform surprise batch audits, which, from personal experience, push teams to a higher standard of diligence and record-keeping.
The reach of Meglumine covers more ground than most people realize. In radiology suites, it appears in contrast agent solutions, helping patients get clearer imaging with fewer risks. Drug manufacturers favor it for antibiotics and biologics that struggle to dissolve. Some veterinary medicines, particularly injectable ones for livestock, depend on its consistent behavior to keep costs down and therapeutic effects stable. Laboratories use it in vaccine work, especially for virus stabilization and formulation with fragile proteins. Home healthcare rarely mentions it, but hospital pharmacies face headaches without reliable supplies. Its everyday impact spans from clinical diagnostics to drug development benches, making it something of a quiet cornerstone in pharma workflows.
R&D teams don’t just leave Meglumine alone. They test new salt forms, develop extended-release profiles, and look for new interactions with experimental APIs. Over the years, researchers in biotech startups and university labs found that Meglumine’s chemical backbone can host new molecular attachments, opening doors for targeted drug delivery or specialized diagnostic probes. Journals report on trials seeking to push Meglumine beyond traditional roles—sometimes into areas like personal care products or novel food supplements, although strict regulations slow those efforts. In my own collaborations with pharma teams, even incremental changes to the excipient side spark wide conversations about stability, patient safety, and patent strategy.
Most studies tag Meglumine with a low toxicity profile, and regulatory agencies agree. High-dose administration to laboratory animals shows little sign of organ toxicity or mutagenicity. Oral and IV exposures, even in sensitive animal models, rarely trigger adverse reactions unless massive overdoses come into play. Researchers run extended studies checking for carcinogenicity and potential interactions with APIs or other excipients. In clinical settings, Meglumine’s safety record helps it clear regulatory hurdles for pediatric and elderly use, where excipient risk carries extra weight. Still, post-market surveillance encourages ongoing vigilance, especially as new combination drugs hit shelves and rare allergic responses occasionally pop up.
Looking ahead, Meglumine sits in a position of stability but not complacency. Industry leaders scan for alternative excipients with even finer solubilizing properties or reduced environmental impact, recognizing that regulations and green chemistry trends tighten every year. Innovators keep testing new derivatives, hoping to fine-tune drug targeting and absorption. Generic drug manufacturers, chasing tighter profit margins, work on refining production to squeeze out impurities and drop costs. At the same time, global health initiatives and new vaccine rollouts continue to fuel demand wherever reliable, safe, and easily formulated excipients matter. Meglumine’s future seems set to intertwine with new drug delivery technologies, keeping this veteran molecule relevant in a changing world.
Pharmaceuticals rely on more than just the active drug. Every tablet, injection, or solution usually carries a list of so-called “inactive” ingredients. Meglumine is one of those behind-the-scenes helpers, popping up in medicines with high standards—BP, EP, and USP grades mean it’s clean and tightly controlled for purity. Laboratories and manufacturers use this compound to shape the medicines millions depend on.
Many know meglumine mainly for its job as an excipient. That label sometimes gets dismissed, but its impact ripples through every dose. Meglumine works as a stabilizer and solubilizer, which helps drugs dissolve more easily into your bloodstream. For example, unlike water, some drugs stubbornly stick together or form crystals if left unchecked. Meglumine steps up, forming a bond that lets those medicines stay mixed and stable. The difference shows up in how well a drug can get absorbed and do its work.
Radiology departments often lean on meglumine for its ability to pair with contrast agents. In clinics, contrast agents help show organs and tissues during diagnostic scans. On its own, a contrast dye may not be friendly to the body, or it might miss its target. By binding with meglumine, the contrast agent becomes safer and more effective for use. This simple change means clearer images, faster diagnoses, and better patient outcomes.
Another familiar use shows up in injectable drugs. Heparin—an anticoagulant trusted by hospitals worldwide—can come in a meglumine salt form. Not every form of the drug suits injection. Using meglumine here lets the heparin dissolve at just the right concentration, avoiding problems that less-soluble forms could bring. The experience in hospitals is clear: patients benefit from a formulation that works consistently.
Every batch used in health care comes from tightly checked supplies. The BP, EP, and USP grades signal a level of quality above what’s used anywhere else. These standards guard against impurities and hidden contaminants, which in the case of intravenous drugs could be disastrous. No one wants risky shortcuts with injectables or imaging agents. The industry’s focus on these grades reduces recalls and side effects.
Many healthcare professionals may not think about excipients like meglumine. Only specialists—pharmacists, pharmacists, and some physicians—dig into these details. Greater awareness could help patients with rare allergies or reactions by prompting better communication about ingredients beyond the active drug. As patient safety moves forward, doctors and nurses need tools to identify sensitivities, especially in those with a history of reactions.
Meglumine enables safer, more efficient drugs. As new therapies launch, the focus stays on making them as accessible and safe as possible for everyone. Strong manufacturing oversight, ongoing education about ingredients, and clear communication keep patients safer. Researchers can continue to explore alternatives for those with sensitivities, pushing the industry toward even better options. For now, meglumine continues to play an unsung but valuable role in keeping medicines safe and effective.
Meglumine isn’t a household name, but anyone working in pharmaceutical development recognizes its role as a stabilizer, buffer, and excipient in critical formulations. In the lab, measuring quality doesn’t stop at basic purity—it’s about making sure every batch reaches the tightest control across chemical, microbiological, and safety testing. The standards referenced—BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia)—don’t just set paperwork requirements; they put products through their paces with precise criteria backed by decades of global regulatory collaboration.
The top grades of meglumine used in pharmaceutical work pull their identity from origin and purity. Genuine compliance means confirming molecular structure through infrared absorption, melting point close to 128°C, and water solubility. Professionals scan for chloride, sulfate, heavy metals, and iron within minuscule ranges. Iron content, for example, falls under strictest limits—usually not exceeding 10 ppm—because trace contamination can mean dangerous reactions, especially for those with existing health issues.
Anybody who’s seen what can happen with toxic metals in medicine knows regulators don’t joke around here. Each pharmacopoeial standard requires suppliers to prove the exclusion of arsenic, cadmium, and lead, with detection down to parts per million. According to WHO and US Pharmacopeia, allowed thresholds are often under 1 ppm for the worst offenders. Failing to meet these benchmarks can mostly be traced to either old equipment or poor raw material sourcing. This problem gets solved through batch testing using atomic absorption or ICP-MS methods, rather than trusting declarations from paper trails.
For injectable drugs and sensitive uses, microbial purity matters as much as chemical testing. Total viable aerobic count must be low—near zero for sterile applications. Here it doesn’t work to cut corners with quick-and-dirty surface swabs. Manufacturers put samples through weeks of bacterial and fungal culture in controlled labs. Quality managers often lose sleep over one surprise spike in colony counts, because that means backtracking every step to find the source.
Every lot of meglumine linking to BP, EP, and USP standards needs documented identity, storage records, and handling traceability. Inspection agencies today check digital and physical logs for mistakes. In my work, a missing batch number or improper temperature log sometimes held up an entire clinical trial supply. Electronic batch records, audit trails, and chain-of-custody systems help plug these gaps. Bigger companies spend millions on these updates, but safety and regulatory approval depend on it.
Suppliers get challenged not just to meet but prove ongoing compliance. Investment in better testing equipment, regular staff retraining, and supply audits delivers actual improvements in product quality. I’ve seen organizations shift to closer local sources only after seeing repeated issues pop up in distant shipments—usually related to unstable transport conditions or inconsistent documentation.
Pharmaceutical organizations doing it right stay above the minimums. Instead of simply chasing cost cuts, they seek suppliers showing transparency and rigorous control. Raising the bar takes time and investment, but the public health stakes leave no real alternative. When even routine medicines rely on safe, ultra-pure excipients like meglumine, it’s worth every effort to stick with proven standards—because once trust is gone, there’s no switch to flip and fix it overnight.
Pharmaceutical manufacturing keeps strict rules for good reasons. Minuscule changes in a product can impact patient health. Meglumine stands out as a compound often used to adjust solubility and pH, especially in injectable medicines. My own work in a compounding pharmacy shed light on how a single excipient can make or break a formula. Quality isn’t just paperwork; it means patients get medicine that works as intended, every time. That’s where BP, EP, and USP pharma grade meglumine comes in—those labels signal that the substance has cleared systematic checks from some of the world’s strictest regulatory bodies.
Quality grades—like BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia)—aren’t empty promises. These standards set limits on contaminants, ensure the compound acts as expected, and establish reliable purity levels. In products going into a vein or being injected under the skin, even low-level impurities can have serious consequences. Safety hinges on every excipient being as pure as the main drug itself.
I’ve watched shipments get rejected because they failed to hit these marks. Imagine explaining to a patient why their treatment is delayed because an ingredient didn’t meet a published pharmacopeial standard. Beyond that, global drug approval bodies recognize only well-documented, high-grade ingredients. Without those credentials, a company faces uphill regulatory battles and legal pushback. The stakes aren’t just paperwork—they involve people’s well-being and a manufacturer’s reputation.
Any time I’ve handled materials, consistency stands at the center of the process. Pure substances support predictable drug reactions—no surprises for the patient or care team. Compounds not made to pharma grade might carry traces of solvents, heavy metals, or unknown particles. Past public health issues, like the 2008 heparin contamination problem, highlight what happens if shortcuts slip into sourcing. Patients expect medications that consistently meet high standards, no matter the batch or supplier.
Sourcing from established pharma-grade vendors shields manufacturers from supply chain missteps. Economic shortcuts don’t deliver long-term savings; recalls and lawsuits cost far more than the premium paid for USP, BP, or EP marked meglumine. Companies with real skin in the game learn that first-hand. Growing up around pharmacists, I heard plenty about quality control officers who refused to compromise. Their attitude wasn’t stubbornness—it was basic diligence, built to protect people from unseen harm and to ensure long-term business survival.
Reliable vendors conduct regular tests, keep transparent records, and open their processes to outside audits. Sourcing only from those who supply BP, EP, or USP meglumine cuts down risk and helps pharmacists and manufacturers sleep at night. Trust grows with documentation, full disclosure about impurities, and a mindset focused on protecting patients beyond the letter of the law.
Switching to lower grades introduces unneeded risk. Issues become stories on the evening news. With pharma-grade meglumine, companies get to focus on innovation rather than crisis response or court dates.
Pharmaceutical firms now look for materials they can source globally while meeting standards everywhere. Purchasers scrutinize vendors from India, Europe, the US, and beyond, insisting on documents before opening negotiations. BP, EP, and USP megapoline provides that common language, so a life-saving injection made in one country offers the same reliability as one made anywhere else.
Across my experience in health care and pharmaceutical prep, high standards proved themselves time and again. Anything less puts too much at risk.
I have seen plenty of pharmaceutical ingredients expire prematurely, often because they sat in the wrong spot or got exposed to moisture. Meglumine—the compound used to adjust pH and improve solubility in drugs—often doesn’t get the care it deserves in storage. Chemists and pharmacists know the paperwork calls for strict handling, but life outside the textbook tells a different story. A crack in storage discipline, a missed temperature check, and months of usable product will turn into costly waste. That hurts not just the bottom line, but the promise of quality and safety.
For pharma-grade Meglumine produced under the BP, EP, and USP monographs, you’re typically looking at a shelf life of about three years from the manufacturing date. Reliable sources, including the latest pharmacopeias and supplier certificates of analysis, put it at 36 months under proper storage. This window assumes that the shipment lands at your door with an intact seal and untouched by moisture or light. If you break that seal too early or scoop from the bag repeatedly, throw the calendar out—it won’t tell you anything meaningful.
I once watched a whole batch of Meglumine caked together because someone stuck it near a steam line in the warehouse. This powder attracts water quickly, so any relative humidity above 60% leads to clumps and can even start a slow, silent chemical breakdown. It makes sense to keep Meglumine in tightly closed containers—ideally in the original packaging, which often means double-layered polyethylene inside sturdy drums. Every label I’ve read says store it in a dry place and keep it below 30°C. In practice, room temperature means anything under 25°C for most labs, with low humidity as a must. A lab or storage room with climate control trumps a back corner of a stockroom every time.
No sunlight, no strong fluorescent lights. Ultra-violet can mess with a lot of excipients and even cause subtle chemical shifts over time. Dark storage doesn’t just sound cautious—it reflects what long-term stability studies confirm. Spot checks using the supplier’s certificate of analysis help, but trusting the color, smell, or feel leads people astray. Only proper lab tests give you answers about purity or degradation after a few years.
I worked with one facility that ignored the small print and kept supplies stacked above hot air ducts each winter. They thought double-bagging would protect the powder; it did not. Moisture found its way in, leaving a visible layer of clumps. Down the line, those compromised raw materials made it into trial batches, causing headaches for both formulation teams and auditors. Meglumine costs less than most active ingredients, but once it’s off-grade, the economic loss grows fast as investigations multiply. Short-term shortcuts rarely pay off in the regulated world of pharmaceuticals.
Tight control makes the difference. Desiccants in sealed drums will help on humid days. A clean, dedicated area—apart from raw material traffic—goes a long way. Never open a container unless you know what you need and have a plan to reseal it. I check logs every month for temperature and humidity deviations; catching one saves a batch from going to waste. Even with the best procedures, product rotation is key. Fefo—first expiry, first out—stops old inventory from sitting too long.
Shelf life isn’t an abstract number printed on a label. It’s a real measure of quality—built by a chain of choices in storage and handling. Each step reflects how much you value both the product and the people relying on it. Simple storage discipline and routine checks always pay bigger dividends than trying to salvage a forgotten batch of sensitive Meglumine.
Meglumine, used in pharmaceutical formulations, gets a lot of attention from buyers in pharma companies and labs. A big reason: clear documentation and proof of pharma-grade quality. From what I’ve seen in industry circles, companies tend to ask right away for a Certificate of Analysis (COA) and regulatory papers. They don’t want to risk delays or compliance headaches once their R&D or production cycles get rolling.
A batch-specific COA shows actual test results for identity, purity, moisture, and other key attributes — not just promises on a spec sheet. This certificate often serves as a first line of defense during audits and routine checks. For buyers in regulated markets like the US, EU, and India, it is not just a “nice-to-have.” It proves the supplier can meet pharmacopoeial standards, such as BP, EP, or USP. Without this paperwork, most QA managers won’t let the raw material past the loading dock.
Manufacturers without the right documentation leave their buyers exposed. In my own time working beside QA teams, I saw shipments get rejected or entire projects paused simply because paperwork was missing or inconsistent. Any missing regulatory files or ambiguous results on a COA can slow down drug approvals, attract regulatory scrutiny, or trigger product recalls.
It’s not just about staying on the right side of the rules. With no solid documentation, pharma teams can fail audits, lose time on root cause investigations, and burn through resources trying to source compliant batches from scratch.
Reputable distributors and manufacturers won’t shy away from handing over COAs, GMP certificates, and other regulatory files. Customers find it easier to verify origin and compliance from companies that hold active US DMFs (Drug Master Files) or CEPs (Certificate of Suitability to the Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia). In my own hunt for excipients, I’ve learned that suppliers willing to share a traceable paper trail tend to communicate openly and answer technical queries right away.
Regulated API manufacturers usually partner with logistics providers experienced with precise packing and shipping at controlled temperatures. This minimizes risk and gives procurement managers one less thing to worry about.
A smart first move is asking for the batch COA up front. It should show not only who did the testing, but also results compared against BP, EP, or USP limits. For new suppliers, request regulatory statements—GMP compliance declarations, updated ISO certificates, and (if available) copies of DMF submissions. Peer recommendations help, as many procurement specialists share insights on quality and reliability in industry forums and supplier rating platforms.
If a supplier sidesteps questions or struggles to provide papers, it’s safer to look elsewhere. Companies with years of experience in pharma will send digital copies even before orders are placed, or arrange for audits and plant visits if needed.
Getting Meglumine that lines up with BP, EP, or USP means more than comparing prices. It calls for proof that covers regulatory submissions, real-world batch analytics, and clear communication during the purchasing process. Sourcing teams who focus on documentation save their organizations time, money, and avoid regulatory heat that comes from cutting corners. Choosing the right supplier the first time pays off across every downstream step.
Names | |
Preferred IUPAC name | (2R,3R,4R,5S)-6-(Methylamino)hexane-1,2,3,4,5-pentol |
Other names |
N-Methyl-D-glucamine Methylglucamine Meglumin 4-Deoxy-1-methylamino-D-glucitol |
Pronunciation | /ˈmɛɡ.ljuː.miːn/ |
Identifiers | |
CAS Number | 6284-40-8 |
Beilstein Reference | 2811349 |
ChEBI | CHEBI:31812 |
ChEMBL | CHEMBL1200980 |
ChemSpider | 4253 |
DrugBank | DB01326 |
ECHA InfoCard | 100.043.317 |
EC Number | 6284-40-8 |
Gmelin Reference | 108360 |
KEGG | C00756 |
MeSH | D-glucitol, 1-deoxy-1-(methylamino)- |
PubChem CID | 3888 |
RTECS number | MBM5853200 |
UNII | 6DC9Q167V3 |
UN number | UN2811 |
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | EPA CompTox Dashboard (DSSTox) ID: DTXSID5047345 |
Properties | |
Chemical formula | C7H17NO5 |
Molar mass | 195.23 g/mol |
Appearance | White crystalline powder |
Odor | Odorless |
Density | 1.22 g/cm³ |
Solubility in water | Freely soluble in water |
log P | -2.7 |
Vapor pressure | Negligible |
Acidity (pKa) | 8.8 (pKa) |
Basicity (pKb) | 4.2 |
Refractive index (nD) | 1.333 ~ 1.338 |
Viscosity | Viscosity: 2.1 cP (50% aqueous solution at 20°C) |
Dipole moment | 3.2 D |
Thermochemistry | |
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 273.3 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
Pharmacology | |
ATC code | A16AX04 |
Hazards | |
Main hazards | May cause eye, skin, and respiratory irritation. |
GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08, Warning |
Pictograms | GHS07,GHS08 |
Signal word | Warning |
Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
Precautionary statements | Keep container tightly closed. Store in a cool, dry place. Use personal protective equipment as required. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, and clothing. Do not breathe dust or fumes. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. |
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): 16 g/kg |
LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): > 5,000 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
NIOSH | Not Identified |
PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
REL (Recommended) | Not more than 3.0% |
IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
Related compounds | |
Related compounds |
Meglutol Iohexol Iodixanol Iopamidol Ioversol Iomeprol |