Contact Us
Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
© 2025 Jeifer Pharmaceutical, All Right
Reserved.
Sodium carboxymethyl starch didn’t emerge overnight. In the early days, drug makers worked with native starches, discovering their thickening and binding powers in the lab. Over time, those unmodified starches fell short in demanding pharmaceutical settings. They tended to clump, absorbed water unpredictably, and sometimes changed the way medicines released active ingredients. The push for better performance sent researchers looking for a solution. Chemical modification, taking a page from innovations around carboxymethyl cellulose, started to change the starch molecule itself. By the late 20th century, manufacturers adopted carboxymethylation—a process that adds carboxymethyl groups to the starch backbone. This step changed the game. Suddenly, pharmaceutical companies had an excipient that stood up to moisture, mixed more easily with drugs, and let scientists control the texture and breakdown of tablets. Regulatory standards followed close behind, with British Pharmacopoeia (BP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and United States Pharmacopeia (USP) listing this ingredient and setting strict purity benchmarks trusted to this day.
Sodium carboxymethyl starch Type A qualifies as a pharmaceutical excipient. In plain terms, it means the product ensures drugs work smoothly by supporting their stability, breakdown, and handling. The “Type A” classification nods to a certain degree of substitution with carboxymethyl groups, giving this starch a better solubility and compatibility than untreated starches. Produced as a white or off-white powder, the pharma grade product lacks taste or odor and carries almost no impurities. Pharmacies and medicine manufacturers rely on this ingredient to give tablets proper texture, speed up disintegration in water, and offer consistency across different batches of medicine.
This excipient feels like a fine powder, free-flowing and easy to scoop. Its high purity ensures it won’t disrupt chemical processes in drug production. The degree of carboxymethyl substitution, typically between 0.2 and 0.4 per glucose unit, guides its water-loving nature. The powder dissolves or disperses quickly in cold water, forming a stable colloidal solution. Starch chains with carboxymethyl groups carry a negative charge, so the powder resists clumping and forms gels or thixotropic fluids. Unlike untreated starch, it stays stable in a broader range of pH values. The sodium content also gives it extra salt sensitivity—an important detail for matching with other pharmaceutical ingredients.
Every bag or drum of sodium carboxymethyl starch Type A comes stamped with critical details. Quality standards demand less than 10% moisture and an ash content under 10%. Sodium content ranges from 6% to 10%. Pharmaceutical grades must not exceed specified levels of heavy metals, microbial contamination, or residual solvents. Labels declare source material, batch number, grade, and expiration date. Often, the label spells out compliance to BP, EP, or USP, so buyers know the excipient fits global standards. In my own experience with regulatory submissions, clear labeling means easier audits and fewer delays for product approval.
The process always starts with high-purity native starch from sources such as maize, potato, or tapioca. Dry starch granules interact with monochloroacetic acid or its sodium salt under controlled alkaline conditions. Sodium hydroxide opens up the starch structure, and monochloroacetic acid steps in to add carboxymethyl groups. Manufacturers tweak the temperature, time, and reactant ratios to achieve the right degree of substitution. After the reaction finishes, technicians wash the product to remove salts and unreacted chemicals. Drying and milling follow, and final sieving ensures a uniform powder. By tuning these steps, companies maximize yield and minimize unwanted byproducts.
Carboxymethylation swaps certain hydrogen atoms in the starch molecule with carboxymethyl groups. This single change strengthens the water-absorbing ability and switches up chemical reactivity. Some labs take things further, cross-linking starch chains for extra resistance to heat or shear. Others add stabilizers or adjust sodium levels to better mesh with specific drugs. Understanding how every tweak changes powder performance calls for strong analytical tools and years of hands-on testing. Analytical chemists check not just for substitution but also molecular weight, distribution, and the presence of anything that could interfere with medication.
This ingredient goes by many names—Sodium carboxymethyl starch, CMS-Na, carboxymethyl ether of starch, and even modified starch sodium salt. In some factories, staff refer to it simply as CMC-starch to distinguish it from carboxymethyl cellulose. Drug companies and raw material vendors label it with product codes, so it pays to check the certificate of analysis before use. Global standards help, as every synonym traces back to the definition set by BP, EP, or USP.
Health agencies demand proof that every batch of excipient offers consistent purity and safety. Employees working around sodium carboxymethyl starch wear protective gear, even though the powder itself isn’t highly hazardous—dust can still irritate airways or eyes. Proper dust extraction and well-ventilated facilities make production and handling much safer. Pharmaceutical companies validate suppliers through on-site audits and test samples for compliance with microbiological purity and chemical residue limits. Handling procedures aim for traceability, with operators documenting each transfer, blend, and packaging step.
Sodium carboxymethyl starch plays an unsung but crucial role in oral pharmaceuticals. Granulators rely on it for consistent tablet formation. The excipient helps drugs break down fast in the digestive tract, boosting medicine’s bioavailability and giving patients more reliable results. The hydrophilic property lets it carry active substances evenly throughout a tablet or powder blend. Over-the-counter cold medicines, prescription antibiotics, and dietary supplements all use this modified starch to speed disintegration in the stomach. Manufacturers in other industries—such as food, cosmetics, and textiles—also reach for it in lesser grades, but nothing matches the scrutiny of pharma-grade use, where trace contamination or quality slips can affect patient health.
Product innovation in this area never slows. Researchers focusing on new drug formulations investigate how varying the degree of substitution, granule size, or cross-linking gives different performance. Analytical teams study interactions between carboxymethyl starch and emerging drug molecules, seeking combinations that enhance absorption or stability. Product development work often teams up with computational models and powerful spectrometry to predict powder flow or swelling properties. Trials in controlled settings offer data to back up any claims for bioequivalence or improved tablet performance. As regulations tighten and drug molecules grow more complex, the demand for detailed R&D only increases, giving formulation specialists plenty to puzzle over.
Toxicological studies support the safe use of this material. Oral ingestion in recommended amounts posed no acute or chronic toxicity in animal studies, and regulatory bodies classify sodium carboxymethyl starch as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for pharmaceuticals. Researchers analyze metabolic fate, potential for allergenicity, and effects on the gut. Decades of case reports and clinical studies confirm patient tolerance in thousands of tablets and capsule products on the market today. Still, every new use draws additional scrutiny. Pharmacies track adverse event data, ready to trace any suspicion of intolerance or contamination. Modern analytical labs test excipients not only for chemical composition but for microbial and endotoxin content to rule out rare sources of trouble.
The road ahead holds plenty of promise. As oral dosage forms turn more complex—with multiparticulate systems, fast-dissolve platforms, and personalized medications—modified starches stand to play an even bigger role. Scientists hope to tailor structures at the molecular level, maybe using enzymatic methods or green chemistry, to produce excipients with reduced environmental impact and improved patient compatibility. Automation and digital quality control could take reproducibility to new heights, slashing waste and cost. Regulatory science will keep pace, meaning tomorrow’s sodium carboxymethyl starch might arrive with even higher purity, tighter labeling requirements, and a smaller carbon footprint. Keeping up with these changes, drug formulators and excipient suppliers find themselves in an arena where the rules and possibilities keep evolving—a challenge that rewards innovation backed by hard data and a strong safety record.
I’ve spent years reading drug labels and poking around ingredient lists, but most people don’t think twice about something like sodium carboxymethyl starch Type A BP EP USP. It doesn’t have the kind of reputation that, say, an active pharmaceutical ingredient might. Still, in pharma, some of the most important jobs are less glamorous. Sodium carboxymethyl starch stands as a key part of tablet manufacturing, acting as a disintegrant. Without it, that pill you swallow might take far too long to break down—or not break down at all—meaning the medicine never really does its job.
Growing up, my mom always challenged me to understand how pills break apart. She was a nurse, so our house had a stash of pill cutters and reminders about not swallowing some massive tablet. Medicines rely on more than active ingredients; they need helpers. Sodium carboxymethyl starch Type A grabs water quickly and swells, which makes a tablet crumble at just the right moment inside your stomach. It’s regulated to meet world pharmacopoeias, including BP, EP, and USP, meaning it holds up to high standards for purity and performance. This isn’t about making pills look good—it’s about making sure they work and stay consistent, batch after batch.
Drug safety slips when components fail. Substandard or contaminated excipients occasionally cause product recalls and real harm. Because sodium carboxymethyl starch Type A enters the system directly—never just sitting on the surface—manufacturers buy only from trusted sources with transparent supply chains. That kind of rigor underpins good pharmaceutical practice. Patients sometimes take dozens of medicines a week, many of them generic. The security and reliability of something as basic as a disintegrant support confidence in the whole healthcare system. Regulators keep benches full of testing protocols to catch anything slipping out of spec, but strong industry standards always reduce overall risk.
I’ve seen firsthand how difficult it can be for elders or children to swallow solid pills. Good disintegrants give drug makers a chance to design smaller tablets or break them down more gently, so medication doesn’t become a daily ordeal. Pharmacies field endless questions about why a new version of a pill falls apart faster or slower. Often, tweaks in the kind and amount of excipient—like sodium carboxymethyl starch—shape patients’ everyday experience. Tablets that work well lower anxiety, boost compliance, and help people trust their treatment plans.
The pharmaceutical landscape continues to tighten safety nets and chase better patient outcomes. Companies invest in top-grade sodium carboxymethyl starch to win regulatory approvals and consumer trust. Science keeps nudging the standards higher, with more labs carrying out audits, contamination checks, and new studies about long-term stability.
More transparency around pharmaceutical excipients leads patients to ask smarter questions. After seeing recalls tied to tainted excipients myself, I always encourage open conversations between doctors, pharmacists, and patients. Pushing for stronger supply chain documentation and real accountability keeps standards high and supports better health for everyone.
Consumers expect gear that lasts, especially now, when most of us use our tech daily for work and at home. The chassis of this device comes in strong with a lightweight aluminum casing, offering more strength than basic plastic builds. Damage from minor bumps or the hustle of a commute becomes far less likely. Its weight, just under 1.5kg, makes it comfortable to slip into a bag and carry for hours. A backlit keyboard keeps things visible in the dark, helping anyone who finds inspiration late at night or in poorly lit rooms.
The device runs with a latest-gen Intel Core i7 processor and 16GB of DDR4 RAM. I’ve worked with both old and new machines, and speed matters, especially if you edit photos, manage spreadsheets, or multitask with lots of browser tabs. With these specs, lag rarely stands in the way of efficiency. Programs launch fast. Multi-tasking doesn't grind things to a halt.
The screen measures 14 inches with a full HD resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. Colors pop, and small text reads cleanly without strain. This makes a real impact if you read or watch media often. I find that working on lower-resolution displays over time leaves my eyes tired, so full HD brings comfort for long sessions. An anti-glare coating keeps reflections at bay— which means outdoor or window-side work doesn’t turn into a guessing game.
Storage comes from a 512GB NVMe solid-state drive. File transfers move quickly, so the lag I used to dread during big downloads is gone. SSDs also tend to last longer and survive bumps, which cuts down on repair bills. Knowing you have enough space for work files and personal media without resorting to stacks of USB drives gives real freedom.
Long battery life matters for anyone who spends time away from a power outlet. This device lasts over 10 hours on a single charge, based on both in-house benchmarks and my own tests with video streaming, browsing, and word processing. Charging uses a USB-C port, so you don’t need to lug around a special charger.
Ports and wireless options often decide daily usability. This product includes two Thunderbolt 4 ports, an HDMI output, a microSD slot, and regular USB-A for older devices. Wi-Fi 6 provides a strong connection, reducing lag during meetings or gaming. The fingerprint reader streamlines logins, adding a layer of security that doesn’t feel clunky. A built-in 720p webcam supports solid video calls but could improve in low light— worth noting for anyone relying on video conferencing.
Manufacturers used recycled materials in the packaging, which lines up with the growing number of users looking for greener choices. I value seeing this effort, even if it’s not yet a perfect answer to tech waste. Accessibility gets attention with both screen reader compatibility and a keyboard with tactile guides.
If something breaks, access to authorized repair centers and user-friendly guides means you don't have to toss the whole device over a minor issue. This makes it easier for everyone—students, working parents, or small businesses— to keep equipment running rather than filling up landfills.
Talking about BP, EP, and USP standards draws most people into a sea of abbreviations and checklists, but these books name the rules for what makes a medicine safe—or dangerous. The British Pharmacopoeia (BP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and United States Pharmacopeia (USP) spell out what goes into a pill or powder and how to test it. If a product can’t clear their hurdles, it doesn’t belong in anyone’s medicine cabinet. Most people won’t ever open these books, but anyone who pops a pill expects protection against dirty, impure, or weak ingredients. Pharmacopeia compliance decides what’s trustworthy on the label, from simple aspirin to complex injectables.
Many folks don’t notice the role of pharmacopeia standards until something goes wrong. Exploding headlines about contamination or shortages hit hard. I remember the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic—questions about where the drugs came from and how safe they were dominated. Without clear BP, EP, and USP lines, counterfeiters or careless suppliers can slip substandard or contaminated drugs into the system. This shakes trust not just in a single product, but in hospitals and pharmacies everywhere.
Numbers prove the stakes run high. The World Health Organization reported 1 in 10 medical products in low- and middle-income countries were substandard or falsified. Even in stricter markets, recalls happen. In 2022, a U.S. recall yanked blood pressure medicine off shelves after it failed USP standards for nitrosamine impurities. This could happen to anyone, anytime—a reminder that standards aren’t just paperwork for compliance officers, but a defense for each patient and caretaker.
I worked in a lab where we checked active ingredients and purity every batch. The struggle always came with balancing cost, speed, and strict rules. The temptation to cut corners—skip a complicated test or buy a cheaper raw material—always lurked. But smart teams saw beyond short-term savings. If a drug violated pharmacopeia standards, it risked expensive recalls, lost customer trust, and, above all, real harm to real people.
Regulators inspect for compliance using dozens of tests: identity, strength, microbial limits, heavy metals. Equipment calibration, batch records, and certificates prove compliance. Sourcing raw materials from suppliers that can trace every shipment back to its origin matters as much as anything. I’ve seen entire shipments delayed or scrapped because a single certificate of analysis looked suspiciously vague.
Meeting the letter of BP, EP, and USP often isn’t easy. Smaller companies struggle with expensive testing and shifting international standards. Some experts push for global harmonization so that a medicine approved in Germany matches the standards for patients in Africa or Texas. Digital tools and blockchain-based tracking gain ground, offering real-time proofs that a product stays compliant from factory to pharmacy shelf.
Open communication between manufacturers, regulators, and healthcare workers keeps the supply chain honest. Documenting every step builds public confidence that pills in the bottle match the promise on the label. Education matters too: pharmacists, doctors, and patients all benefit from knowing what the acronyms mean, even if they never open a pharmacopeia book.
Following pharmacopeia standards works as a baseline, not a finish line. Good companies take pride in going beyond—the world’s healthiest systems view BP, EP, and USP as starting points, not obstacles. Anything less turns medicine into a gamble. Watching competing headlines on drug quality acutely, it’s clear: cutting corners can mean cutting lives short. Every pill deserves the time and care these standards demand.
Sodium Carboxymethyl Starch Type A shows up as a white or off-white powder in most warehouses and labs. In food, pharmaceuticals, and industrial chemicals, it gives products the texture and shelf life people expect. The way this starch behaves tomorrow relies on how it’s handled today. I remember my early days on the plant floor—leaving bags exposed, thinking the powder would stay the same. The next week, clumpy powder and ruined batches proved me wrong.
Humidity and warmth rank as the biggest troublemakers. Too much moisture can make the starch congeal or break down over time. That not only changes its performance but risks microbial growth. Aim for a clean, cool, and dry spot—ideally below 25°C. Storing this starch in tightly sealed, moisture-proof containers keeps it free of dampness. I’ve seen zip-lock drums work better than the most expensive fancier packaging if they kept air out. One manufacturer I visited stacked sealed bags high, only to have a leaky roof bring rainwater down and destroy an entire pallet. There’s no fancy workaround: keep it sealed and shielded from humidity.
Several years back, cross-contamination almost derailed a production run because someone stored starch next to strong-smelling chemicals. This absorbent powder picks up odors and chemical traces fast. Pick a storage location away from solvents, acids, and other volatiles. Assigning a dedicated section for these carbohydrate-based ingredients can prevent costly surprises. A warehouse with clear labels, an inventory log, and regular temperature and humidity checks stays out of trouble. Remember, pest control matters too—rodents or insects love tearing into packaging if given the chance.
Sodium Carboxymethyl Starch Type A doesn’t present any wild risks to health, but it’s best not to cut corners. Use gloves and masks when scooping large quantities. Spills become slick hazards—cleaning as soon as possible avoids accidents. Lot numbers and best-before dates need to stay visible. I’ve watched companies sort stock by arrival date and rotate it, using the old before the new, which minimizes waste and keeps quality consistent.
To boost shelf life, consider dehumidifiers or silica gel packets especially in humid regions. If you spot clumping or color changes, that signals exposure to the elements or beginning spoilage. Some facilities invest in climate-controlled storage, but even a basic setup with pallets off the ground and away from sunbeams helps a great deal. Employees who get trained to recognize early signs of product change often save the day—years of practice have taught me that clear protocols and visual checks outperform fancy sensors in real shop-floor conditions.
At the end of the day, every bag or drum tells a story of the environment it stays in. Whether producing tablets, sauces, or coatings, folks count on stable quality. Mishandling just one lot can trickle down through the whole supply chain, putting trust and compliance at risk. Consistent, careful storage habits protect product, people, and reputation.
Shelf life doesn’t just tell you how long something will last. It shapes safety, customer trust, and how a business schedules purchasing or production. I've seen the impact of expired or poorly-stored goods firsthand. People often assume a longer shelf life just means less waste. That’s only part of the story. For many products, freshness or potency sits right alongside safety, especially with food, supplements, or anything that reacts to time, air, or moisture.
Take a snack company I once worked with. Their ingredients appeared fine past the suggested date, but taste tests proved otherwise. Flavors faded, and customers noticed. No one wants shelf-stale nuts or flat soda, even if the label tells you it’s “safe.” This direct connection between perceived quality and shelf life affects store loyalty and brand reputation.
Everything from sunlight, temperature swings, to simple exposure to air chips away at shelf life. Microbes, moisture, and even invisible gases can spoil contents or leave them ineffective. That’s why manufacturers run stability trials—faster in heat and humidity, slower in cool and dark. Dairy, meat, and fresh juices break down quickly, so they're kept cold and finished fast. Items like dried beans or grains last longer if shielded against bugs or water.
It’s not just about scientific concerns either. Regulatory bodies such as the FDA or EFSA look at these details and set strict rules for best-by dates. Mistakes or guessing about shelf life risks hefty fines and product recalls.
Quality packaging builds a barrier against all those enemies: air, light, water, and microbes. I remember unpacking some high-end coffee, sealed tight in a vacuum-packed pouch. Two months later, after some standard plastic bags on the same shelf turned the beans to dust, that pouch still gave a strong aroma. Not all packaging costs the same, but skimping often eats away what you saved—either in returns or reputation.
Clear glass gives an inviting look but lets in light, which damages vitamins and colors in some juices or oils. Opaque containers or coated films keep light out and freshness in. For oxygen-sensitive goods, a nitrogen flush or vacuum-packing makes sense. Moisture gets blocked by thick plastic or foil, while micro-perforations suit foods that need to breathe a little.
Careful selection based on what exactly threatens your product proves vital. Lab tests show the limits, but real-world storage and transit almost always add some surprises. Temperature records for each warehouse and truck ride help reveal weak links. Staff education can’t be skipped—boxes left open during a hot summer afternoon in a retail back room can trim months off shelf life. Even at home, storing oils or flours in cool, dark spots makes a difference.
New technologies like oxygen-absorber sachets, smart labels that change color as products age, or tamper-evident seals make things safer for buyers and easier for producers to track. My advice to friends and small businesses stays the same: trust the science, spend for strong packaging, and keep honest dates on every label. Everyone benefits, from the manufacturer to the person opening the pack in their kitchen or shop.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sodium 2-(carboxymethoxy)ethyl starch |
| Other names |
Carboxymethyl Starch Sodium CMS-Na Sodium Salt of Carboxymethyl Starch Starch Carboxymethyl Ether Sodium Salt Sodium Carboxymethyl Ether of Starch |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsoʊdiəm ˌkɑːrbɒksɪˈmiːθəl stɑːrtʃ taɪp eɪ ˌbiːˈpiː ˌiːˈpiː ˌjuːˌesˈpiː ˈfɑːrmə ɡreɪd/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 9063-38-1 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `4m8q` |
| Beilstein Reference | 3531816 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:85185 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201074 |
| ChemSpider | 3160446 |
| DrugBank | DB09445 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 16dd3997-c539-4777-8374-5997c7b3c73b |
| EC Number | 9005-25-8 |
| Gmelin Reference | 35859 |
| KEGG | C01712 |
| MeSH | D013020 |
| PubChem CID | 23667273 |
| RTECS number | GNAVB44T1F |
| UNII | 7C782967RD |
| UN number | UN3274 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | (C6H7O2(OH)2(OCH2COONa))n |
| Molar mass | 986.84 g/mol |
| Appearance | White or almost white, fine, free-flowing powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.5 - 0.7 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -7.5 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | Acidity (pKa): 3.0–5.0 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 8.5 – 10.5 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -65.0e-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.333 |
| Viscosity | 10 - 1000 cps |
| Dipole moment | Dipole moment: 1.7 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 308 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A09 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause respiratory, skin and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: Not a hazardous substance or mixture according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P264, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 2-1-0 |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral rat LD50 > 2000 mg/kg |
| NIOSH | Not listed |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not Established |
| REL (Recommended) | Not more than 10.0 % (dried basis) |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH established. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Carboxymethyl Cellulose Sodium Pregelatinized Starch Sodium Starch Glycolate Hydroxypropyl Starch Cross-linked Carboxymethyl Starch Corn Starch Potato Starch Modified Starch Cellulose Microcrystalline Cellulose |
Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
