Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China sales01@liwei-chem.com 1557459043@qq.com
Follow us:



Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate BP EP USP Pharma Grade

Historical Development

Long before anyone worried about the purity of compounds in pharmaceuticals, people used natural soaps and surfactants to clean, wash, and process materials. Scientists later figured out how to tweak fatty acids from oils to make more robust cleaning and emulsifying agents. By the early 20th century, chemists produced sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), blending practical necessity with scientific innovation. SDS, also known as sodium lauryl sulfate, found its way from simple detergents to high-purity requirements for laboratory and pharmaceutical work. Over time, different pharmacopoeias like BP, EP, and USP established detailed benchmarks for SDS, transforming it from a basic cleaning ingredient to a critical pharmaceutical excipient. This shift responded to the growing call for predictable quality and safety in applications that touch human health, paving the way for today’s pharma-grade SDS and stricter oversight from regulators, researchers, and manufacturers alike.

Product Overview

SDS in pharma grade serves multiple roles beyond cleaning surfaces. In my experience working with laboratory formulations, this compound often acts as a powerful surfactant, wetting agent, and emulsifier. The pharmaceutical-grade product is more than a cleaning agent—it helps solubilize tough-to-dissolve compounds, improves the texture of ointments, and assists in the analysis or separation of biological samples. It shows up in everything from drug formulations to laboratory reagents and sometimes even finds its way into tablets to ensure they break down consistently. Meeting BP, EP, and USP standards guarantees lower contamination, a big worry for injectable drugs or diagnostic reagents. That extra care keeps patient safety at the forefront, reflecting both scientific advances and practical needs in pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Physical & Chemical Properties

SDS appears as a white or slightly off-white powder or crystalline solid. Having worked with SDS, it’s easy to notice its characteristic, almost clinical odor. The powder dissolves readily in water, creating a clear solution with strong foaming properties. Its molecular formula, C12H25SO4Na, features a 12-carbon tail with a sulfate head, which makes it great at lowering surface tension. Boasting a melting point just above 200°C, SDS remains stable in dry conditions and resists breaking down during routine pharmaceutical processes. The chemical’s amphiphilic structure (hydrophobic tail and hydrophilic head) explains its talent for interacting both with greasy molecules and water, setting it apart from basic salts or sugars that only dissolve but don’t emulsify.

Technical Specifications & Labeling

Strict pharmacopoeial grades require manufacturers to prove each batch contains very little contamination. From personal experience in quality control, verification includes checking assay (typically above 98.5%), water content, acidity, sulfate purity, levels of heavy metals, and absence of organic solvents or carcinogenic residues. Labels clearly display batch numbers, origin, storage instructions, and warnings about inhalation or skin contact hazards. Pharma-grade SDS often comes in tamper-evident, double-sealed containers to prevent contamination, and labels always state compliance with BP, EP, or USP guidelines. This traceability means if there’s ever a product concern, companies can quickly track down the source.

Preparation Method

Industrial SDS starts out with raw materials like lauryl alcohol, often derived from coconut or palm kernel oil. Manufacturers sulfonate the lauryl alcohol, introducing a sulfate group. Neutralization with sodium hydroxide then yields SDS, which is filtered, washed, and sometimes recrystallized to achieve pharmaceutical-grade purity. Throughout these steps, technicians run constant checks for residual impurities, and large-scale reactors run under clean manufacturing protocols. The production process relies on careful control over temperature, pH, and mixing to prevent unreacted oils or byproducts from sneaking into the final product—a key lesson from years handling bulk chemicals in GMP settings.

Chemical Reactions & Modifications

SDS demonstrates a robust chemical profile. It resists mild acids and bases and doesn’t readily break down at room temperature, though strong oxidizing agents or heat above 200°C can degrade its structure. Its amphiphilic nature allows SDS to bind tightly with proteins and other organic molecules, which is why it disrupts cell membranes in biological applications. Chemists sometimes modify SDS to create variants with different chain lengths or to swap the sodium ion for another cation, tweaking foaming, solubility, or toxicity profiles accordingly. These modifications help fit specialized pharmaceutical niches, such as less irritating versions for topical creams or blends for controlled drug release.

Synonyms & Product Names

Sodium dodecyl sulfate goes by several aliases: sodium lauryl sulfate, SLS, and its precise IUPAC name, sodium dodecane-1-sulfonate. On different product sheets, it may also turn up as Duponol C, Texapon K12, or Lauryl Sulfate Sodium Salt, driven by manufacturers’ branding choices or regional terminology. Pharma-grade SDS earns additional tags to separate it from industrial or cosmetic types, with clear references to BP, EP, or USP to highlight compliance and reassure users about quality for medical or analytical uses.

Safety & Operational Standards

SDS, in pharma-grade form, follows strict occupational safety standards. Experiences in labs show that powdered SDS can easily irritate the nose and lungs. It dries out the skin if handled without gloves and stings if it gets into the eyes. Safety Data Sheets (SDS, coincidentally the same abbreviation) call for goggles, lab coats, and working in fume hoods when weighing or dissolving the powder. Pharmaceutical production floors stress careful storage in dry, cool, and well-ventilated spaces as the powder clumps or degrades if exposed to moisture or heat. Workers get regular training on spill cleanup and emergency medical handling, as regulators track accidents and exposures closely.

Application Area

Pharmaceutical SDS often gets attention in drug formulation labs and quality control rooms. It plays a clear role as an emulsifying and wetting agent in ointments and creams, improving how active ingredients spread and absorb. In oral tablet production, SDS ensures tablets dissolve evenly for reliable therapeutic effects. Analytical chemists rely on SDS to lyse cells and separate proteins in electrophoresis—without it, countless research and diagnostic tests would stall. In microbiological labs, it helps standardize microbial growth studies by breaking down cell membranes efficiently. The breadth of pharmaceutical science, from drug delivery to biological analysis, leans on this compound for functions far deeper than cleaning glassware.

Research & Development

Much of my experience with SDS comes from research environments where scientists chase both performance and safety improvements. Researchers keep an eye on how SDS and its close relatives behave with sensitive enzymes, nucleic acids, or new drug candidates. Innovations often focus on reducing irritation or finding biodegradable surfactants with similar effectiveness for greener pharma processes. Formulation specialists frequently try blending SDS with other excipients to balance efficacy with lower toxicity, particularly for pediatric and topical formulations. Every improvement, from better protein separation to safer handling for chemists and patients, grows out of this persistent push for higher standards and practical problem-solving.

Toxicity Research

Scientists have tracked SDS’s safety for decades, though its reputation as a skin and mucous membrane irritant lingers. Acute toxicity remains low at pharmaceutical dosages, with most risks tied to accidental overdoses or improper use in sensitive populations. Researchers learned that chronic exposure can damage cell membranes and trigger mild inflammation, which is why pharma-grade SDS faces tougher scrutiny than in soaps or shampoos. Studies suggest fetal toxicity remains low, yet the pharmaceutical world treads carefully, limiting SDS concentrations even in external preparations. Regulatory agencies require rigorous preclinical testing, including evaluations of mutagenicity, allergenic potential, and breakdown by natural microbes, pushing manufacturers to err on the side of safety and complete transparency.

Future Prospects

Future innovation with pharma-grade SDS will likely focus on safety tweaks, reduced allergenicity, and environmental sustainability. The current pace of pharmaceutical research pushes surfactant makers to develop analogs with less irritation and faster breakdown in wastewater. Demand also grows for customized versions with targeted properties, fueling research into nanoemulsions and biodegradable surfactant technologies. Advances in synthetic biology might even yield bioengineered surfactants with similar action but better patient and environmental profiles. My own time spent in research settings points to a future where tighter regulation, combined with smarter chemistry, makes even common ingredients like SDS more responsive to patient, industry, and ecological needs, setting a high bar for other excipients to follow.




What is Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate BP EP USP Pharma Grade used for?

Trusted Cleaning and Formulation Agent

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), often listed as sodium lauryl sulfate, shows up in many pharmaceutical and medical applications. Pharmacists and lab workers spot it in powder blends and liquid solutions: this stuff makes things clean and keeps ingredients mixed together. I spent a few months in a compounding pharmacy, and SDS was a name that turned up any time we wanted a solid foaming power or needed to rinse glassware and get it really free of residue.

In pills and tablets, SDS pulls its weight as a wetting agent. It helps powders blend with liquids, making sure that medications dissolve the right way inside the body rather than clumping together. This feature becomes vital in drugs meant for fast release or for people who need the medicine to take effect quickly. When dry powders enter a liquid, SDS surrounds them and helps water settle in—no big annoying lumps, just a quicker pathway for a pill to do its job.

Reliable Protein Research Workhorse

Molecular biology labs run into SDS all the time, especially in SDS-PAGE, a method used to separate proteins by size. This use sits at the crossroads of medical research and diagnostics. In research, you want solutions that you can trust batch after batch, and pharma grade SDS meets that need with high purity standards from BP, EP, and USP codices.

Researchers like the predictability, since even a tiny impurity can throw off an experiment. In practical terms, this means fewer false results and more trustworthy patient testing—something I’ve seen make a difference when labs work on rare diseases or antibody treatments for cancer.

Topical and Oral Care Products

Shampoos, toothpastes, and body cleansers benefit from SDS for its foaming action. People often take bubbles for granted, but those bubbles help lift and wash away dirt or debris. If you’ve ever wondered how toothpaste stays smooth and effective from first squeeze to last, SDS is in the formula doing its job. In skin and oral health products, pharma grade purity adds peace of mind: you don’t just want results—you want safety in products touching mucous membranes or open wounds.

Current Discussion: Safety and Alternatives

No chemical fits every use without concern. Over the last decade, consumers have started watching ingredient lists more closely. Higher doses or long-term use of SDS—especially in toothpaste or skin care—might cause irritation for some. I recall handling a customer who had persistent mouth ulcers; after switching to an SDS-free brand, her symptoms disappeared. This trend keeps pushing research toward milder surfactants or blends with lower risk of allergic reaction.

Fact: Safety agencies in the US, Europe, and beyond still approve SDS for regulated use. The real focus comes down to how much ends up in the final product and whether it’s used in a form tested for medical use, like the pharmaceutical grades we’re talking about. Setting strict limits on pharmaceutical product concentrations and labeling them properly feels like the straightforward solution. Providing more education, for both professionals and consumers, may tamp down misinformation and let people make choices that suit their needs.

Looking Ahead

People want products they know and trust. For now, SDS pharma grade still plays an essential part in health, science, and hygiene. But those of us who handle or prescribe these substances also have a responsibility: keep an eye on safety, learn from real world stories, and never hesitate to look into better, kinder alternatives if they can get the job done.

What are the main specifications or purity levels of this product?

What Purity Means for Everyday Use

When people talk about a product’s purity, especially in the chemicals or pharmaceuticals field, they expect a clear standard. Purity directly shapes safety, reliability, and value, and not only for scientists in labs or companies in manufacturing. If you’re buying baking soda for your kitchen or acetone for cleaning tools, the level of purity tells you how much of the package is the actual chemical and how much is there as trace elements.

Shoppers assume a bottle off the shelf meets a promised standard, but behind the scenes, manufacturers work under detailed rules. In my experience, as someone who’s looked closely at both sides of the counter, a lot depends on honest labeling and strong testing methods. Consumers are right to expect clear information, so it’s frustrating when vague numbers or fancy terms push aside real clarity.

Common Purity Benchmarks

Most products fall into a few main categories: technical grade, food grade, and pharmaceutical grade. Technical grade shows up in industrial supply shops, suited for products where small impurities cause little harm. For personal care, cleaners, or anything near food, food grade holds a stricter standard. Pharmaceutical grade sits at the top, reserved for ingredients in medicines and treatments.

For instance, technical grade sodium chloride may work for road de-icing, but a cook expects something better in the kitchen. In labs, purity often runs to “analytical reagent” or “ultra-pure,” where even microscopic contaminants can ruin an experiment. Each step up demands rigorous analysis—tools like high-performance liquid chromatography or mass spectrometry, not just basic checks.

Why Purity Can’t Be an Afterthought

The debate isn’t academic. Real health risks ride on overlooked impurities. For example, in pharmaceuticals, contamination with lead or arsenic—even at tiny levels—can harm patients, especially children or people with chronic illness. In my time volunteering with a local food safety advocacy group, tales of adulterated supplements or mislabeled additives often traced back to murky standards and lazy oversight.

A 2023 FDA survey found that 7% of supplements tested contained undeclared substances, a jump from previous years. As product sources stretch across borders, keeping tabs on purity has grown tougher. That’s forced many companies to partner with certified labs, hoping third-party verification will give buyers peace of mind.

Improving Purity Standards and Transparency

Getting this right is more than following rules. Brands can use QR codes linking to certificates of analysis, batch test results, and supplier information. Retailers could highlight trusted certifications, not just for organic products, but for common ingredients too. Clear reporting helps catch problems before they reach families or patients.

High purity costs more, but the gap isn’t always huge. If more buyers demanded real documentation, prices would likely fall as testing scaled. As a dad who reads every food label in the grocery store, I know how easy it is for companies to cut corners where the public can’t see.

At the end of the day, purity reflects trust. When labels match reality, when companies own up to their numbers, and when buyers ask the tough questions, everyone wins. A little vigilance can make a big difference, from lab to living room.

Is Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate BP EP USP safe for pharmaceutical applications?

Understanding Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) shows up in countless personal care and cleaning products, but its story in pharmaceuticals sparks many questions. The letters BP, EP, and USP tell us that the ingredient meets strict standards set by three respected pharmacopoeias: British, European, and United States. That’s a lot of oversight, and for most folks in the industry, this means a measure of trust.

Why Pharmaceutical Grade Matters

Pharmaceutical use isn’t the same as dumping stuff into a shampoo bottle. Take something as sensitive as a tablet coating or a nasal spray—the bar for safety jumps higher. The BP, EP, and USP grades mean SDS was manufactured and tested to make the grade for purity, with fewer contaminants like heavy metals or organic impurities. As someone who grew up in a home where both parents worked in healthcare, I learned early on that just being “clean” wasn’t good enough. Pharmaceutical grade means the margins of safety are tight, giving drugmakers confidence in the ingredient’s reliability for people.

Safety Concerns That Stick Around

Still, using SDS in medicine deserves a closer look. Known as a powerful surfactant, SDS breaks apart grease and proteins. That’s handy in some cases, but overdoing it can irritate skin and mucous membranes. In my experience, even a small spill of SDS during a university lab session caused itching within minutes. That effect means the amount in a pharmaceutical product gets watched with an eagle eye. Product safety isn’t just about what’s inside, but the dose and route. Tablets that spend little time in the mouth bring less risk than solutions sprayed up the nose or applied to open wounds.

Clinical Evidence and Industry Standards

Health agencies put SDS through rigorous studies. For tablet formulations, the industry agrees on safe concentration ranges. Multiple reports reviewed by the FDA show that small amounts, especially up to about 2% in oral products, usually create minimal risk. Topical medicines, though, get even lower levels because broken skin increases uptake. Published studies in journals like Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology document only rare cases of allergy from pharmaceutical SDS. Still, caution guides decisions if products might be used by young children, the elderly, or anyone with extra-sensitive systems.

Building Trust with Transparency

One gap remains: many people don’t realize SDS sits in their medicine cabinet. If your toothpaste or a mouthwash stings, there’s a good chance SDS carries some blame. In my time interviewing pharmacists, I heard stories of customers reporting irritation, not realizing the culprit was a “safe” ingredient. Better labeling and public education turn the abstract letters BP, EP, and USP into real reassurance. Scientists rarely see big problems from SDS in pharmaceutical specs, but companies should invite questions and make allergy risks clear for sensitive patients.

Moving Forward—Practical Solutions

Companies can push safety further by favoring the lowest necessary concentrations, patch testing new formulas, and listing SDS prominently on packaging. Research continues into alternatives for the most sensitive folks. Expanding clinical trials and post-market monitoring help catch rare side effects. Careful formulation, honest conversation, and science-backed limits keep the promise of safe medicines. For those of us who rely on medications every day, this isn’t just a manufacturing decision—it’s personal. The real test comes from the experiences of everyday families, not just laboratory studies.

What are the packaging and storage conditions for this grade?

What Packaging Really Says About a Product

The packaging you choose tells a story about the care and attention poured into your product long before it lands in the hands of a customer. Every year, I walk through aisles stacked with goods, and it always jumps out: the grades staying fresh and uncompromised sit in packaging built for purpose, not just appearance. Strong bags, protective liners, moisture-resistant coatings—these touches do more than just look sharp on a shelf. They shield the grade from oxygen, humidity, and other real-world threats both in transit and on the warehouse floor.

It’s no secret that bad packaging leads to waste. About one-third of all food produced in the world gets lost or spoiled, much of it because of simple mistakes in how goods get packed and sealed. Flimsy wraps and loose lids might cut costs upfront, but they cost more in lost product, failed safety checks, and angry customers willing to blast poor handling online. In my experience, the people who take packaging seriously rarely deal with emergency recalls or late-night complaints.

Storage: The Difference Between Fresh and Lost

Where a grade waits for its next step can make or break its shelf life and reliability. Even the best packaging gets tested if it sits next to heat, humidity, or light. A few years ago, I met a farmer who lost almost half his niche crop because the grains sat too close to a boiler room. He thought the bags could handle it. Heat did what it always does—crept in, loosened seals, and attracted pests. All the work in the field, wasted by a simple storage oversight.

Modern storage goes beyond four walls and a lock. Controlled temperatures and constant airflow can keep sensitive grades fresh for months. Some grades call for nitrogen flushing to keep out oxygen, others need dark, cool rooms. Even color and opacity of containers matter—clear packaging lets light break down vitamins or speed up oxidation. After seeing a batch of vitamins fade early in storage, I learned to never trust sunlight streaming into a warehouse.

Safety and Quality: Traceability Matters

Delivering every batch with clear packaging dates, batch numbers, and handling instructions isn’t just about compliance. I’ve spent afternoons sorting through mislabeled deliveries, trying to pinpoint which lot brought in mold spores or contaminants. Properly labeled and sealed packaging builds a chain of trust from supplier to retailer. It helps your product clear customs, pass audits, and build a name buyers respect.

Solutions and Moving Forward

Investing in higher-caliber packaging and reliable storage spaces pays off. Producers cutting corners to save on upfront costs usually watch those ‘savings’ disappear when their product spoils, or worse, causes harm. Hermetically sealed bags, desiccant packs, humidity sensors—most of these solutions don’t break the bank, and they bring peace of mind.

We all want to bring a top-tier grade to market and see honest value for our effort. Protecting that investment with packaging and storage tuned to real-world risks isn’t just smart business—it's stewardship. Smart choices in these areas keep waste low, quality high, and trust steady from the warehouse to the consumer’s door.

Is documentation such as COA or MSDS available for this product?

Understanding the Real Value Behind COA and MSDS

Running a business that handles chemicals or raw materials means documentation is never just a formality. People often ask, “Is documentation such as a Certificate of Analysis (COA) or Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) available for this product?” and there’s a good reason for that. Without these papers, nobody truly knows what’s inside the bag or drum. If you’re in charge of approving a shipment, or formulating a product, you know how much hinges on what those documents reveal. Safety, legal compliance, and even the quality of the end product can all fall apart without proper paperwork.

A COA provides a breakdown of what’s in the batch. I’ve relied on them to judge if a chemical matches what’s been advertised. People expect a COA to itemize purity, trace elements, and physical data. That’s not just helpful for labs. Manufacturers in everything from cosmetics to agriculture want proof their input meets set standards. Shipping in something off-spec can shut down a production line and burn through budgets long before someone spots the problem. I’ve seen managers toss entire lots just because a supplier shrugged off documentation. It costs too much to gamble.

MSDS: More than Regulatory Red Tape

If a COA tackles quality, an MSDS spells out hazards. I remember a time in a small plant where a missing safety sheet led to someone getting hurt. The wrong gloves, the wrong handling, and a little complacency sent a worker to the hospital. After that, we demanded an MSDS before anything crossed the loading dock. MSDS sheets go beyond chemicals. Even some personal care or cleaning products need one. Each sheet outlines spill response, toxicity, fire-fighting advice, and storage rules. Workers learn to trust that sheet before a new product comes in—lives depend on it. In regulated industries, OSHA in the US, or REACH in Europe, make MSDS access a requirement. Fines aside, no one would want to end up on a news broadcast because of a preventable accident.

Documentation Builds Trust Across the Supply Chain

Markets rise or fall on trust, and paperwork does a lot of heavy lifting. Suppliers can talk quality all day, but buyers want proof in black and white. The biggest brands won’t sign contracts unless documentation comes with every shipment. A plant manager or compliance officer won’t accept a pallet that’s missing records. Customers expect transparent sourcing so, if there’s an issue down the line, someone can trace it to the lot and batch number. Without proper records, it’s impossible to run recalls, track complaints, or pass audits. I’ve seen small companies lock in big deals only because their documentation was bulletproof.

Improving Access and Reliability

Problems don’t always stem from outright fraud. Sometimes suppliers just lag in updating their paperwork or rely on outdated formats. People wind up emailing back and forth, hoping for a scan that matches the product code. Technology can help. Cloud-based traceability platforms and digital portals now let buyers log in and pull current COA or MSDS documents before a purchase. It cuts down on miscommunication. As more buyers demand digital access, suppliers who stick to paper risk getting left out entirely.

If you want an industry to run smoothly, its paperwork had better be in order. The right documents keep people safe, deliver peace of mind, and unlock business opportunities. From personal experience, it’s clear that transparency pays off, and so do suppliers who never treat documentation as an afterthought.

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate BP EP USP Pharma Grade
Names
Preferred IUPAC name sodium dodecyl sulfate
Other names Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
SDS
Lauryl Sulfate Sodium Salt
Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate
SLS
Dodecyl Sodium Sulfate
Pronunciation /ˈsoʊdiəm doʊˈdɛsɪl ˈsʌlfeɪt/
Identifiers
CAS Number 151-21-3
Beilstein Reference 26707
ChEBI CHEBI:9148
ChEMBL CHEMBL1356
ChemSpider 21526
DrugBank DB04530
ECHA InfoCard 100.018.706
EC Number 208-863-7
Gmelin Reference 14645
KEGG C01362
MeSH Dodecyl Sulfate
PubChem CID 3423265
RTECS number WN0100000
UNII 6Q3097689C
UN number UN 2924
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID2022979
Properties
Chemical formula C12H25NaO4S
Molar mass 288.38 g/mol
Appearance White or almost white powder or crystals
Odor Odorless
Density 1.01 g/cm³
Solubility in water Freely soluble in water
log P -1.6
Vapor pressure Negligible
Acidity (pKa) pKa ≈ 1.9
Basicity (pKb) pKb: 15.6
Magnetic susceptibility (χ) −7.2×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol
Refractive index (nD) 1.365 (20°C, 10% aq. soln.)
Viscosity Viscosity (1% w/v solution at 25°C): 1.1 – 1.6 mPa·s
Dipole moment 1.7 D
Thermochemistry
Std molar entropy (S⦵298) 352.5 J·K⁻¹·mol⁻¹
Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) -1067.6 kJ/mol
Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) -3727 kJ/mol
Pharmacology
ATC code D08AJ18
Hazards
Main hazards Causes skin irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. Harmful if swallowed.
GHS labelling GHS07, GHS05
Pictograms GHS05,GHS07
Signal word Warning
Hazard statements H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. H335: May cause respiratory irritation.
Precautionary statements P210, P261, P264, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362
NFPA 704 (fire diamond) 2-3-0
Autoignition temperature 310°C
Lethal dose or concentration LD50 Oral - rat - 1,290 mg/kg
LD50 (median dose) 1,200 mg/kg (oral, rat)
NIOSH PB6825000
PEL (Permissible) 15 mg/m³
REL (Recommended) 10 mg/m³
IDLH (Immediate danger) Not listed.
Related compounds
Related compounds Ammonium lauryl sulfate
Sodium laureth sulfate
Sodium myreth sulfate