Tapioca has roots that stretch through centuries of farming culture in South America and Southeast Asia. Communities relied on the cassava root, known to some as manioc, as a food source long before industry found new uses for it. As much as folks enjoy tapioca pearls in bubble tea or pudding, the story shifts in the pharmaceutical world. By the turn of the 20th century, increasing demand for stable, plant-based excipients nudged pharmaceutical industries toward this resilient tuber. After a string of scientific studies and regulatory push by global pharmacopeias, tapioca starch in its pharmaceutical grade form earned a key spot in the toolkit of drug formulators. The big three standards—British Pharmacopoeia (BP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and United States Pharmacopeia (USP)—each carved their own set of requirements. Over time, these standards ensured that every sack of pharma tapioca met rigorous purity tests, setting it far apart from the flour that sits in kitchen cupboards.
At first glance, pharmaceutical-grade tapioca looks like fine, dry powder. Its simple appearance hides a complexity that’s only unlocked by chemical analysis and process controls. Manufacturers extract and purify this starch from selected cassava cultivars, never leaving anything to chance. Careful screening takes place, both on the fields and after harvest, in order to weed out contaminants and any undesirable plant material. What comes out at the far end of the pipeline is a polysaccharide-rich ingredient widely valued for its neutral taste, stability, and swelling behavior. Its role tends to fall under the umbrella term of excipients, but that term sells it short. As a binder, a disintegrant, and sometimes even as a filler, tapioca’s flexibility stretches far beyond mere bulking agent.
Pharma-grade tapioca wears consistency on its sleeve. It pours as a free-flowing, almost snow-white powder that doesn’t easily cake under moderate humidity, though excess moisture leads to clumps. Its granules vary, but high-end products aim for a narrow particle size distribution, ensuring predictable performance in tablet pressing and mixing processes. On the molecular side, its primary component is amylopectin, with a modest fraction of amylose. That balance encourages the moisture retention wanted for tablet disintegration and compactness. Chemically, it resists acid and basic breakdown under typical storage conditions, keeping stability on par with other starches. Testers see a neutral to slightly acidic pH—usually just under 7—straight out of the pack. Unlike many modified starches, pharma-grade tapioca skips harsh chemical processing, which preserves its low impurity profile. Heavy metal limits and bacteria counts stay far below regulatory limits, reflecting the rigorous controls from field to warehouse.
Boxes and bags coming from certified suppliers carry a wealth of information, since nothing less passes muster in regulated supply chains. Purity scores hover above 98%, with moisture content falling between 10 and 14%. Ash levels remain at a minimum, typically under half a percent, showing solid removal of plant debris and minerals. Each batch lands with an identifying lot code, expiration date, country of origin, and storage instructions—usually cool and dry, away from sunlight. Quality teams run regular audits, confirming microbial counts match European and US standards, especially since pharmaceutical use leans so heavily on ultra-low endotoxin risk. Labels must also disclose allergen information, because cross-contamination in mixed production facilities could cause real harm to sensitive patients. Supply chains have gotten better at transparency, driven by traceability demands from both regulators and manufacturers.
The making of pharmaceutical-grade tapioca follows a sequence as old as modern food technology, but it’s been supercharged with automation to prevent human error. Roots arrive fresh from farm, sometimes within twenty-four hours of harvest. Workers and machines peel, wash, and chop them before soaking begins. Milling transforms the softened tubers into a thick slurry, which then runs through screens and hydro-cyclones to pull starch away from fibrous byproducts. From there, the slurry undergoes several washing cycles in fresh water, stripping away proteins, lipids, and microbial residues. Once the liquid clears up, filtering and centrifuging produce a dense starch cake. The final steps involve flash-drying under controlled temperatures, preventing the build-up of heat that might alter the starch’s molecular structure. The result lands in sealed, food-grade bags, ready for lab and microbial testing. Every lot faces scrutiny before it leaves the factory—a detail that shouldn’t be overlooked, as the medical community depends on such vigilance.
Untreated pharmaceutical tapioca keeps close to the original polysaccharide structure of cassava starch. In select cases, chemists modify the powdered starch to lock in properties suited for specific tasks. Techniques like cross-linking, partial hydrolysis, or physical heat treatment change gelatinization points, swelling behavior, or enzymatic resistance—all key when crafting sustained-release tablets or capsules. Additives get flagged on specification sheets, because transparency trumps secrecy every time in this industry. Chemical changes must respect the original intent of pharma-grade excipient standards; nothing can drift off into the realm of experimental unless supported by stacks of safety and function data submitted to regulatory authorities. These tweaks support medication performance, reducing batch failures that can clog production or lead to waste.
Tapioca appears under several names, especially in international supply streams. Some labels stick to “cassava starch,” others to “manioc starch,” and certain technical sheets use the pharmaceutical official term “Tapioca Starch BP/EP/USP” to clear up ambiguities. Derivative products, such as pregelatinized tapioca or modified tapioca starch, get their own designations. Buyers who step into the world of pharmaceutical excipients soon learn to trust these labels, since an error in identification can compromise product quality and legal compliance. Many companies try to build their own brands or names onto packages. Those looking for transparency should always cross-check with official monographs or recognized regulatory listings before placing orders or introducing a new variant into sensitive drug recipes.
Cleanliness, traceability, and purity dominate safety concerns at every step—from harvest to packaging to shipping. Facilities handling tapioca for pharma applications craft hazard analysis plans that anticipate everything from pest intrusion to cross-contamination with gluten or allergens. Transport conditions, handling methods, and personal protective equipment follow protocols laid out by authorities like the FDA and EMA. Storage rooms don’t just sit at whatever climate pleases the day; temperature and humidity controls get logged, and handlers receive training to protect both themselves and the product. Auditors, both internal and governmental, don’t take kindly to shortcuts. Final testing benches pharmaceutical-grade tapioca against purity, solubility, microbiological, and foreign matter measurements, making sure that nothing slips through that could ever threaten a patient’s health when it ends up in a medication.
Tapioca earns its keep across solid and semi-solid dosage forms. In tablets, it acts as a binder, pulling tiny particles together as machines crank out hundreds of thousands in short bursts. Its swelling and fluid absorption help tablets fall apart easily in the gut—a critical trait where consistent bioavailability means the difference between relief and ineffectiveness. Cough syrups and suspensions sometimes lean on tapioca for stability, especially where patient populations need gentle, non-irritating ingredients. In growing fields of allergen-free or plant-based pharmaceuticals, tapioca edges out wheat and corn starch for its lower protein levels and reputation as a safer alternative. Trends push toward clean-label medicines, especially in Europe, and tapioca rides this wave, backed by decades of safe use data and consumer acceptance as a food ingredient.
Scientists and formulators approach tapioca with curiosity, often asking what makes it different from better-known excipients like maize or potato starch. Research pipelines test its behavior under compression, moisture, and various pH conditions. Some teams dig into its compatibility with new active ingredients or its ability to support 3D-printed drug delivery systems. Industry research sometimes focuses on cost and sustainability, since tapioca fields can thrive in rocky or sandy soils with less fertilizer, making this an appealing choice for countries in the global South. Technical journals share articles about improved extraction methods, or the impact of minor cassava varieties on starch performance, often with eye-opening findings that challenge assumptions held by previous generations of formulators.
The topic of toxicity always comes up whenever a new excipient hits regulatory review. For tapioca, the bulk of safety studies trace back to its main food use; millions eat cassava-based products daily. Cyanogenic glycosides, found in raw cassava, trigger warnings, but refined pharmaceutical starch has these compounds reduced to non-detectable levels after processing. Long-term toxicity studies, conducted across rats, dogs, and in cell cultures, consistently return clean safety margins at intended dose levels. Rare cases of allergic reaction show up in literature, but rates compare favorably with other excipients. Regulatory authorities stay alert for risks of microbial contamination or environmental toxins, yet regular surveillance programs and certifications check those boxes over and over.
Looking ahead, the spotlight lands on sustainability, cost, and patient-centered formulations. Faced with a push for pharmaceuticals sourced from plants with less environmental impact, tapioca appeals to both public and industry alike. Innovation continues as researchers hunt for modified tapioca starches tuned to extended release, rapid dissolution, or specialty delivery platforms. The surge in telemedicine and home compounding means more pharmacists and researchers examine simple, robust excipients they can trust across a wide range of climates and conditions. Emerging regulations on traceability and carbon footprint will shape which starches manufacturers choose, and tapioca, with its adaptability and clean record, stands ready to meet these new challenges head on.
Tapioca brings back memories for most people — pudding from childhood or perhaps an ingredient in bubble tea. Few realize that a much purer form of this starch, processed to BP, EP, and USP standards, has become a backbone in modern medicine. Doctors, pharmacists, and patients rely on medicines that need reliable, safe ingredients. These pharmaceutical-grade standards for tapioca mean strict controls on purity, contamination, and physical properties. Not all starches reach this level, but tapioca steps up thanks to its low reactivity and exceptional physical properties.
Pharmaceutical manufacturers choose tapioca at this grade because it works as an excipient. This means it’s the stuff that holds the active drug together, helps with tablet breakdown in the stomach, or bulks up a tiny active ingredient so the tablet is easy to handle. For drugs that go through sensitive patients or children, tapioca offers non-GMO, gluten-free support, which keeps reactions or allergies less likely. Rice starch and corn starch sometimes compete for this role, but tapioca stays stable across temperatures and humidity — a lesson I learned firsthand working on hot summer days at a medicine packaging plant, when other starches started clumping but our tapioca batches stayed fine.
Each acronym stands for an agency controlling quality in pharmaceuticals: British Pharmacopoeia (BP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and United States Pharmacopeia (USP). These organizations define chemical and microbiological purity, test for heavy metals, and check particle size. Contaminants or bacteria in a batch may cause widespread recalls — a headache no drugmaker or patient wants. I remember a case where a shipment that failed to meet USP standards led to costly delays for an entire line of generic drugs. Pharmaceutical-grade tapioca avoids those nightmares.
Not every patient tolerates wheat, corn, or synthetic fillers. Tapioca from cassava roots comes out naturally hypoallergenic, which is why many pediatric and geriatric medications rely on it. It’s not just about absence of allergens; tapioca’s natural properties help with disintegrating tablets at the right time, making medicines easier to digest, especially for small bodies or delicate digestive systems.
Cassava, the source of this pharmaceutical tapioca, usually grows in tropical climates. That means drugmakers face risks tied to weather, transport, and farming practices. Over the last decade, droughts or supply disruptions have forced some companies to turn to synthetic excipients, often at higher cost or with less natural compatibility. Supporting responsible, sustainable cassava farming reduces this risk while also keeping the ingredient as affordable as possible, crucial for both developing and developed healthcare systems.
Most patients and even doctors rarely ask where the starch in antibiotics or vitamins comes from. Still, informed choices start with transparency. Drug labels mentioning tapioca, especially pharma grade, help those with food sensitivities. Widespread education on excipients like this may sound like a small step, but it adds up to better patient care and greater trust in the companies that make our medicines.
Most of us know tapioca as the chewy bits in bubble tea, but pharma grade tapioca (especially labeled BP, EP, USP) lives in a different world. Pharmaceutical makers count on these starches for tablet-making, sometimes as fillers and sometimes to help tablets hold shape or dissolve just right. Tapioca prepared for medicine goes through rigorous checks to meet global benchmarks from the British, European, and United States Pharmacopoeias. These bodies demand strict controls on composition, microbiology, and levels of contaminants. Not every batch of tapioca can call itself pharma grade. Starch designed for common food applications just doesn't undergo this level of testing or paperwork.
Root crops like cassava, the base for tapioca, can pick up heavy metals, fungal toxins, or other pollutants if grown in poor soil or stored poorly. Unsafe farming or storage can turn a harmless ingredient into a liability. Pharma suppliers must trace batches, test repeatedly, and make sure the starch meets purity thresholds. Some years back, the pharmaceutical industry flagged starches contaminated with aflatoxins, which are serious health risks. Cases like this drive drug manufacturers to double down on quality controls and supplier transparency.
Pharma-grade means more than just a certification sticker. Manufacturers run tests for things like microorganisms, residues, and unusual byproducts. The United States Pharmacopeia spells out acceptable limits for things like moisture, iron, and even particles left over from pesticides. Tablets aren’t snacks—if patients with impaired immune systems get exposed to contaminated ingredients, the risk spikes. This pushes vendors and buyers to run in-depth audits and require batch certificates. Reputable labs regularly sample material and reject what doesn’t meet set standards. For patients, this reduces worries over allergic reactions or cross-contamination.
Tapioca stands out because gluten intolerance and wheat allergies are on the rise. People with celiac disease can safely take drugs that use tapioca starch, assuming other cross-contaminants are absent. This makes tapioca a preferred alternative to wheat-based excipients. Allergen labeling laws now force pharmaceutical companies to track and declare every component. Switching to tapioca cuts one potential threat for a lot of patients. Until recently, some companies didn’t notice how often hidden wheat starch showed up in generics or supplements. Improvements in labeling rules have made drug choices clearer and safer.
Tapioca’s safety in medicine starts with careful sourcing and ends with vigilant oversight at every stage. Reliable pharmaceutical suppliers work with audited farmers and production facilities. Documentation for origin, batch purity, and contamination tests stay on record, accessible for audits. Regulatory inspectors often visit suppliers and demand proof for every lot shipped. Incidents have shown the cost of cutting corners. Risk management teams now rely on digital tracking, regular in-house and third-party lab tests, and combining traditional paperwork with modern traceability tools.
Even with certifications like BP, EP, and USP, there’s always pressure to keep reviewing evidence, update farming best practices, and improve testing. Spot checks, smarter tracking, and whistleblower protections all play a part. Better collaboration between regulators, manufacturers, and ingredient growers could stop problems before they leave the farm. For anyone involved in making or taking medicines, understanding where ingredients come from and how they’re vetted protects not just customers, but the reputation of the entire industry.
Pharmaceutical excipients matter just as much as active ingredients, especially in how they shape safety and consistency. Tapioca, or cassava starch, is used across the world. What sets pharmaceutical-grade material apart from the food stuff in your pantry comes down to strict benchmarks and purity that have to match pharmacopeia standards: BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia).
BP, EP, and USP spell out requirements for purity, appearance, chemical identity, ash content, pH, and moisture. This isn’t academic bureaucracy—it’s about preventing contamination, reducing risk, and keeping drug makers honest. For tapioca fit for pharmaceutical use, these documents say it must look white, with a neutral odor and taste. No grey beans, speckled grains, or odd smells belong here. The starch flows freely, forming a soft powder that disappears in water and swells when heated.
Heavy metals like lead, arsenic, and mercury shouldn’t show up in any meaningful amount. Laboratories run specific tests: Lead under 1 part per million (ppm), arsenic below 2 ppm, and total heavy metals capped at 10 ppm, if you ask the USP. BP and EP use similar cut-offs. Getting this wrong means a tainted medicine, and I don’t know anyone who’d roll those dice with their health.
End result purity depends on both raw cassava roots and every step in refining. BP and EP set a minimum purity of 98% starch content by dry weight, with the rest being water and tiny traces of harmless compounds from the plant itself. Pharmaceutical grade often comes out between 98% and 99.5% purity—achieved through sophisticated mechanical washing, repeated filtration, and gentle drying. Moisture content sits between 10% and 15%, which keeps the starch stable but not clumpy. The USP and BP require loss-on-drying tests and clear protocols for this.
Bacteria and fungi present a bigger challenge than most realize. Starch from improperly dried, stored, or handled cassava carries the risk of mold or bacterial growth. Pharmacopoeial-grade starch goes through microbial testing, keeping total aerobic counts under 1000 CFU/g, total combined yeasts and molds less than 100 CFU/g, and requiring absence of nastier bugs like E. coli and Salmonella. Without these guardrails, medicines can turn deadly.
Good tapioca starch gives consistent tablet hardness and doesn’t react with sensitive APIs. I’ve seen what happens to painkillers when lower-quality excipients are used—crumbling pills, uneven absorption, and sometimes, outright recalls. For manufacturers, achieving high purity means working with trusted suppliers and investing in testing each batch for identity, pH, and contaminants. The pH usually falls between 4.5 and 7.0, ensuring compatibility with most drugs.
I once visited a plant where documentation trails were as important as the production line itself. Audits, traceability, and certificates of analysis (CoA) turn up on the desk of every serious QA manager. GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) status is non-negotiable; it means suppliers are monitored, and batches get rejected if even minor specs aren't met.
Starch might seem simple, but at the pharmaceutical level, any shortcut threatens drug safety and public trust. Right now, real improvements are emerging from better raw material sourcing, more sensitive testing for heavy metals, and automated drying processes that limit microbial growth. Anyone in this field—not just chemists and QA folks—benefits from staying alert to small changes in compendia requirements and pushing suppliers to do better.
Pharmaceutical grade tapioca often pops up in tablet formulations, powders, and other drug delivery systems. Tapioca, coming from the cassava root, is a staple in regions like Southeast Asia, Africa, and South America. Over the years, it's gained traction as a functional excipient. One reason pulls from personal encounters: people with food allergies or intolerances always keep a sharp eye on excipient labels. Folks who can’t handle wheat or struggle with digestive discomfort breathe a little easier when they see starches derived from roots rather than cereals.
Those with celiac disease or severe gluten intolerance know the stress of hidden gluten in medicines. Pharmaceutical-grade tapioca checks that gluten-free box because cassava doesn’t grow with gluten proteins. This has saved many from unexpected reactions. Both the European Pharmacopoeia (EP), British Pharmacopoeia (BP), and US Pharmacopeia (USP) lay out purity standards for excipients used in medicines. When tapioca meets these specs, manufacturers confirm its botanical source, and extensive testing screens for cross-contact contaminants. Not all corn or wheat starches can say the same.
As for allergens, the big eight are always in the spotlight: milk, eggs, fish, shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, and soybeans. Tapioca slides past each. Cassava’s history as a famine food—in Africa and beyond—means it’s rarely blamed for allergenic reactions. In my own work with product formulations, tapioca starch offered a piece of mind absent in wheat or corn-based products, where allergy risks sneak in through supply chain lapses or shared processing equipment.
No ingredient walks into a pill factory in a vacuum. Tapioca’s natural lack of gluten and common allergens looks great on paper, but real-world production muddies those waters. Supply chain guarantees turn vital. I’ve spoken with pharmacists and quality assurance teams who double down on certificates of analysis and supplier transparency before giving the “free from” label a stamp of approval. For someone with a gluten-triggered autoimmune disease, shared processing lines might spell trouble—even if the risk seems low. The best pharmaceutical suppliers address this by running allergen tests and segregating production.
One challenge crops up for manufacturers as they manage increasingly complex ingredient lists. Trust between patients and drug makers relies on full ingredient disclosure and robust quality control checks. If a tapioca source is swapped or supply chains shift, companies must inform downstream users right away. More than one recall over the past decade has grown out of unlabeled allergens crossing into medicines. As a consumer and a formulation consultant, I push for traceability and third-party allergen testing.
Digitization of records and tighter regulatory oversight can help. Some progress comes from blockchain tracing or barcode scanning, letting a pharmacist see active allergen testing records right from a shipment’s origin. These steps cut the odds of unexpected gluten or allergen exposure.
Choosing ingredients like tapioca starch often tips the scale for those managing food sensitivities. With BP, EP, and USP compliance, tapioca serves as an excipient free from gluten and major allergens, as long as reputable, vigilant suppliers stay involved. This supports trust, safety, and comfort for a patient faced with daily medication choices—and that trust goes a long way in healthcare.
Talking to workers in pharma packaging lines, no one enjoys chasing after a batch gone clumpy. Tapioca starch in pharma grade, whether labeled BP, EP, or USP, has a knack for picking up moisture from air. I once watched several kilos in a paper sack transform into a brick after a single muggy night. That might sound like something only quality managers worry about, but the loss lands squarely on everyone’s shoulders—especially in manufacturing where downtime is expensive. Fact: pharmaceutical-grade starch draws in water fast, shifting both weight and texture. Any room that stores this starch should clock humidity at less than 60%, and using industrial dehumidifiers keeps trouble off the horizon.
Good bags act as guards. The best pharma operations use double bags—one inner, one outer—with strong closures that really seal. The outer usually offers some armor against accidental punctures. Avoid tossing or dragging sacks across the floor. Pinholes matter more than people think, as starch loves a surprise sip of water or whiff of chemicals. If a warehouse deals with various chemicals, especially volatile ones, keep the starch high up on shelves and away from cleaners or solvents. This isn’t a luxury for audit days; contamination can actually ruin an entire day’s batch.
Sweeping floors before bringing in fresh bags of starch isn’t about keeping things pretty. Shoe prints, cardboard dust, or even a stray coffee cup can begin a contamination chain. Any open bag should get an airtight seal with a food-safe clip or transfer to a clean, labeled bin. Never mix bags, even if they claim the same grade—traceability loves neatness. A label with date and batch means people can track back problems, and that’s saved many teams from guesswork down the line.
Staff sometimes debate the “perfect” spot on the shelf. Temperature swings kick off surprises: too hot, and even pharma-grade starch can yellow or degrade; too cold and condensation forms inside packaging. Around 15–25°C works well. Fluctuation does the damage, so steady always wins. Air movement helps, too—stacking bags against outside walls asks for trouble, especially if the outside temperature shifts quickly.
Shifting heavy sacks calls for muscle, but also care. Slashing open a bag with any old knife leaves fibers or shreds in the batch; using clean, sharp tools helps avoid problems. Gloves should be clean, too—no one wants hand lotion or lunch residue joining the mix. If the starch is being weighed out, dust masks matter. Inhaled dust sneaks up on folks, and health and safety go beyond ticked boxes. Besides, good PPE habits get the respect of the next person on the shift.
Every time someone opens, moves, or reseals a batch of pharmaceutical tapioca starch, a quick note in the logbook adds accountability. It’s routine, but mistakes shrink when everyone knows the system leaves a trail. Most production errors with starch trace back to a moment of carelessness—open containers, misread labels, rushed storage. A well-documented process lets teams spot problems and fix them without finger-pointing.
Controlled storage and clean handling stop most headaches with pharma-grade tapioca. In practice, pride in the job shows in the details: dry air, sealed bags, simple discipline, and steady temperatures. Anyone can toss starch in a storeroom, but the right approach saves money and keeps batches safe for the people who depend on them.
Names | |
Preferred IUPAC name | Starch |
Other names |
Pharmaceutical Tapioca Starch Pharma Grade Tapioca Starch Tapioca Starch BP Tapioca Starch EP Tapioca Starch USP Medicinal Tapioca Starch |
Pronunciation | /ˌtæp.iˈəʊ.kə ˌbiː.piː ˌiː.piː ˌjuː.esˈpiː ˈfɑː.mə ɡreɪd/ |
Identifiers | |
CAS Number | 9005-25-8 |
Beilstein Reference | 1313035 |
ChEBI | CHEBI:133352 |
ChEMBL | CHEMBL1201780 |
ChemSpider | 36205774 |
DrugBank | DB14132 |
ECHA InfoCard | 03b5fdd2-5f7b-4417-9c88-fc0eafdcac10 |
EC Number | 232-686-4 |
Gmelin Reference | 16306 |
KEGG | C56021 |
MeSH | starch |
PubChem CID | 6284130 |
RTECS number | WK7790000 |
UNII | KM4S3NLT2B |
UN number | UN number: Not regulated |
CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | Tapioca BP EP USP Pharma Grade" does not have a direct entry in the EPA CompTox Dashboard. |
Properties | |
Chemical formula | (C6H10O5)n |
Molar mass | 160.16 g/mol |
Appearance | White or almost white fine powder |
Odor | Odorless |
Density | 0.55 – 0.65 g/cm³ |
Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
log P | -4.8 |
Acidity (pKa) | 4.0–5.0 |
Basicity (pKb) | 8.7 |
Refractive index (nD) | 1.333 – 1.338 |
Viscosity | 600 - 1200 cP |
Dipole moment | 0.00 D |
Pharmacology | |
ATC code | A11CC |
Hazards | |
GHS labelling | GHS labelling for 'Tapioca BP EP USP Pharma Grade': "Not classified as hazardous according to GHS |
Pictograms | GHS07, GHS08 |
Signal word | Non-hazardous |
Hazard statements | No hazard statements. |
Precautionary statements | Keep container tightly closed. Store in a dry, cool, and well-ventilated place. Avoid inhalation, ingestion, and contact with eyes and skin. Use personal protective equipment as required. In case of inadequate ventilation, wear respiratory protection. |
LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): > 7,940 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
REL (Recommended) | 10-30°C |
Related compounds | |
Related compounds |
Starch Maize Starch Potato Starch Pregelatinized Starch Modified Starch Corn Starch Wheat Starch |