Contact Us
Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
© 2025 Jeifer Pharmaceutical, All Right
Reserved.
People have been looking for ways to add color to foods and medicine since ancient times. Synthetic dyes stepped in during the late 1800s as demand for brightness and consistency outpaced what plants and minerals could provide. Tartrazine, a lemon-yellow powder, saw the light around 1884. It quickly replaced older, less stable colors because it stood up to heat and light. Later, scientists found ways to anchor tartrazine onto aluminum salts, creating the stable pigment now known as Tartrazine Aluminum Lake. Because these lakes resist moisture and don't bleed, the food and pharmaceutical industries adopted them for tablets and coatings. Pharmacopeial standards such as BP, EP, and USP stepped in to outline what quality means for anyone using these colors in medicinal products. What started in early dye chemistry labs became an ingredient I find listed on common pill bottles and drink mixes nearly every week.
Tartrazine Aluminum Lake belongs to a family of synthetic colorants based on azo chemistry. The lake form involves binding the dye to aluminum hydroxide, converting what would otherwise disperse in water into a pigment format that handles production stresses. This adjustment solves a real world issue – nobody wants their vitamin C tablet leaching color into a waiting glass of water. In my own kitchen, food colors labeled as lake colors always end up in baked goods and candies that would otherwise stain hands and surfaces. These products address manufacturing goals in food and pharmaceuticals: firm, bright, and safe pigmentation even in harsh or variable conditions.
What strikes me about Tartrazine Aluminum Lake is its vibrant yellow-orange hue, which stays stable under normal conditions, outlasting most plant-based equivalents. It does not dissolve in water but disperses easily, a property that matches its use in solid and semi-solid products. Particle size often falls between 5 to 20 microns, something that matters more than most of us realize—it avoids grittiness without reducing coverage. Chemically, this pigment contains the structure C16H9N4Na3O9S2 in the tartrazine portion, with aluminum hydroxide acting as the base. I’ve read how the lake’s surface chemistry reduces leaching into surrounding matrices, both a safety and quality factor in medicine and food. The pH stability runs from acidic to mildly basic, letting manufacturers rely on it across different recipes and products.
Pharmaceutical and food applications demand strict limits for purity, arsenic, lead, and microbial content in Tartrazine Aluminum Lake. Under labels like BP (British Pharmacopoeia), EP (European Pharmacopoeia), and USP (United States Pharmacopeia), the pigment needs to register at least 10% dye content, with heavy metals coming in at less than parts-per-million levels. I’ve noticed product labels reflecting compliance with these tests, including batch numbers and expiration dates for traceability. Any colorant for pharmaceuticals faces rules for listing active dye content and any diluents used. Companies test batches for particle size, moisture, and dye absorption regularly since a problem here affects everything downstream—from tableting machines to final product performance.
A batch of Tartrazine Aluminum Lake starts with dissolving tartrazine dye in water and then precipitating it onto a freshly prepped aluminum hydroxide base. Manufacturers keep temperature and pH within tight limits, since dyes can degrade or lose brightness instantly if these slip out of range. After thorough agitation, the precipitate gets filtered, washed to remove unwanted water-soluble salts, and then dried in controlled conditions to deliver a free-flowing, powdery pigment. My experience in industrial-scale kitchen settings made me realize how critical every step becomes for consistency—if washing isn't complete, the product clumps and foams during tablet production. Subtle refinements in process lead to easier handling and better integration in the end product, a fact that ends up influencing every stage from transport to application.
In the lab, researchers alter tartrazine’s molecular side chains to enhance stability or reduce allergenicity. On an industrial level, though, the focus remains on controlling the way the dye adheres to its aluminum substrate. Peak efficiency demands conditions that encourage maximum dye binding. Unbound dye affects color shade and may migrate in finished goods—especially a concern in multi-layer tablets. Chemists sometimes blend the lake with other pigments to match custom color profiles needed in brand marketing. The reliability of the aluminum substrate, its hydration level, and the presence of co-precipitates such as magnesium hydroxide open up subtle variations in pigment properties, sometimes visible as shade differences or color strength in side-by-side products. These changes remind me that every pigment batch brings risks and opportunities for process improvement, especially where brand consistency matters.
In retail and regulatory environments, Tartrazine Aluminum Lake shows up under dozens of names. You’ll find it as FD&C Yellow No. 5 Aluminum Lake in the US, E102 Aluminum Lake on European food labels, or simply Color Index Pigment Yellow 100. Drug manufacturers reference it as CI 19140:1 in technical documentation. Marketing teams sometimes use more generic names, such as “lemon yellow lake” or just “yellow lake.” A consumer scanning pill ingredients for food dyes quickly runs into all these aliases, and this fragmentation means advocacy groups and regulators stay busy ensuring safety and transparency for anyone tracking their intake.
As someone who’s handled food colors in batch production, I appreciate the layers of safety protocols in place for Tartrazine Aluminum Lake. Plant operators receive training to avoid dust inhalation, since the fine powder can aggravate asthma and trigger allergies. Occupational standards require gloves, masks, and well-ventilated work areas. On the consumer side, regulators pay attention to documented effects—tartrazine has been linked to mild hypersensitivity reactions in a small fraction of the population, particularly those with existing food dye allergies. Regulatory authorities set Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) values based on animal studies and long-term consumption data. Routine batch testing for heavy metals, microbiological safety, and color strength catch problems long before they hit the market, a fact that underpins much of the public trust in pharmaceuticals and food safety systems.
Tartrazine Aluminum Lake finds its way into all kinds of solid pharmaceutical forms—think tablets, coated pills, and chewables—mostly because it resists bleeding and adds stable, eye-catching color. Patients use color as a cue; this dye makes it easier for people of all ages to distinguish one medicine from another. Over-the-counter vitamins and supplements frequently use this pigment for aesthetic purposes, but also for small-format chewables where liquid colors simply aren’t practical. In food, I see it most in bakery icings, processed cheese, and hard confections—products exposed to heat, drying, or high-shear mixing. The pigment even supports cosmetics, giving eyeshadow and lipstick shades a consistent, recognizably bright tone that survives in a purse or pocket. Consumer expectations for color and stability drive demand, and manufacturers build process lines with pigments like this in mind.
Ongoing research in my circles focuses on reducing allergenicity and increasing the sustainability of both production and application. Scientists study alternative sources for the aluminum substrate, as well as ways to improve dye binding efficiency using green chemistry principles. Advances in particle sizing bring finer control to color saturation, especially important in the age of personalized medicine. Research teams also model migration and potential degradation in complex pharmacy formulations, helping raise the bar for safe, long-lasting products. Some labs pursue non-synthetic alternatives, though the technical hurdles remain significant. Researchers in both academia and industry continue to look for biomarkers signaling hypersensitivity so that physicians can make better recommendations for sensitive patients.
Decades of toxicity research on Tartrazine Aluminum Lake shape how regulators treat it today. The major concerns come from rare allergic and asthmatic reactions, especially in people sensitive to other azo dyes. Large-scale animal and human studies haven't shown strong carcinogenicity or reproductive toxicity at typical consumption levels, but regulatory bodies still call for careful tracking of intake, especially among children. Usage remains restricted in some countries, and warning labels appear on pediatric medications in the UK and EU. Parental advocacy led to more circumspect use in children’s food and drugs in the 2000s. I remember early media coverage plant seeds of worry that haven’t disappeared. Newer research investigates individual metabolites, interactions with gut microflora, and subtle genotoxic risks, emphasizing a cautious approach—never letting convenience sideline long-term safety.
Looking ahead, Tartrazine Aluminum Lake faces rising demand for traceability, increased focus on health effects, and calls for cleaner production. The global shift toward transparency in labeling pushes both regulators and industry to provide ever-more detailed information on color additives, including origin, batch history, and analytical results. Consumer preferences for “natural” push research into safer, plant-based alternatives—though synthetic lakes often win out in performance and cost. Younger scientists drive projects exploring biodegradable substrates and new dye-binder interactions to reduce environmental impact. As regulatory scrutiny rises, companies investing in process monitoring, digital traceability, and improved surfactant systems stand to earn public trust. I also see the future relying on clearer allergen reporting, more direct patient counseling, and open data sharing across the global supply chain, all steps that keep these necessary pigments as safe as possible.
Anyone who’s ever cracked open a bottle of vitamin gummies or scanned a row of cold medicine at the pharmacy has seen the work of color additives. Tartrazine Aluminum Lake is one of those unsung ingredients behind the eye-popping yellows in our medicine cabinets. It takes a basic yellow food dye, tartrazine, and transforms it into a more stable, solid form by pairing it with aluminum. This process makes the color "insoluble in water," a big deal for pharmaceutical makers. Ingredients in a multivitamin pill, for example, come from powders and granules that get pressed or blended together. Without something like Tartrazine Lake, colors can bleed out or fade, leading to inconsistencies in appearance. A reliable dose isn’t just about the active ingredient. Patients, pharmacists, and nurses count on being able to recognize that bright yellow tablet instantly.
People have every right to be wary of artificial additives in anything meant for health. Tartrazine, also known as E102, has a long history of use and a pile of scientific evidence showing it's generally safe in small amounts. Regulatory agencies in the US (USP), the UK (BP), and Europe (EP) set strict limits on how much tartrazine and other dyes can go into products. They keep a close watch on side effects, especially for folks sensitive to certain additives. For the vast majority, the trace amounts used in pharma grade products don’t cause trouble.
On the other hand, for that small group with allergies or intolerance to Yellow 5, even a little can trigger reactions. It’s why reputable companies clearly label their products. Staying transparent builds trust and keeps everyone safer. Some manufacturers have shifted to natural dyes where possible, but these can break down faster or cause issues with shelf life.
The impulse to see color as “just for looks” misses a bigger truth. Color often means function in pharmaceuticals. When a toddler spits out every green syrup but swallows the golden yellow one, color makes the difference. Hospitals rely on color-coded pills for quick identification. Mistakes can cost lives. Finding the correct pill or confirming the right dosage isn’t just a matter of habit—it's a matter of safety.
My neighbor once mixed up his blood pressure medication with heartburn tablets simply because he’s colorblind and the two pills were shaped alike. If one had featured a strong yellow dye, it could have saved him a scare. Color, in this case, is not cosmetic—it's practical, sometimes crucial.
People want clean labels and fewer synthetic additives. That’s clear from the surge in demand for plant-based colorants and transparency from companies about every ingredient. Still, as of now, nothing quite matches the reliability and stability of certain synthetic lakes, especially in the high-heat, light-exposed world of pharma production. Research into safer, naturally derived lakes keeps pushing forward. If a natural alternative can do the job just as well, many would welcome the switch.
Until then, transparency and choice matter most. If someone is sensitive to tartrazine, clear label warnings and diverse product offerings let them stay safe without missing out on vital medicine.
Color catches the eye before anything else. In tablets and syrups, the bright yellow hue from Tartrazine Aluminum Lake isn’t just for show. Pharmaceutical companies color medications for a few reasons—branding, patient recognition, and to signal different strengths. Some folks worry about safety, especially when colors look bright and synthetic. Tartrazine, also known as FD&C Yellow No. 5, draws a lot of attention, and for good reason. It often shows up in antihistamines, vitamins, and even cough syrup for children.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval tells us that Tartrazine Aluminum Lake meets certain purity and safety standards. Its history stretches back decades in food and medicine. The amount that gets used in pills or liquid medication is tiny—a fraction of a milligram per dose, much less than people typically get from sodas and candy. Regulators carve out margins of safety that go beyond typical daily exposure. Based on large-scale reviews, the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority set an “acceptable daily intake” to keep total exposure well below levels shown to cause harm in animal studies.
Some patients do claim to feel side effects linked to tartrazine. Reports of hives or asthma attacks sound scary, but actual allergic reactions in the general population remain rare—estimated around 1 in 10,000. In my own experience working with hospital pharmacists, we ran into maybe one or two cases over several years where tartrazine was the likely problem. Most folks tolerate it with no trouble at all.
Worries around tartrazine’s effect on children go deeper than just allergic reactions. Studies looking into attention-deficit issues kicked off public debate. The Lancet published one of the biggest studies in 2007, finding some behavioral changes linked to mixtures of dyes—including tartrazine—plus sodium benzoate. British regulators took action, asking manufacturers to pull synthetic yellows from children’s foods. U.S. agencies chose tighter label requirements instead of a ban. For pharmaceuticals, the color shows up on ingredient lists and pharmacy labels, so parents or patients can steer clear if they want.
Another layer involves branding and accessibility. Manufacturers sometimes use colors to make drugs look different, aiming to reduce mix-ups. That helps some people, but it can make it tough for those who avoid synthetic dyes for cultural or health reasons. A friend who works with a Muslim community pharmacy sometimes runs into this barrier; families ask for dye-free alternatives, but there aren’t always choices. Generic manufacturers sometimes skip coloring, but the result: very similar-looking pills, which can increase confusion for folks taking multiple medications.
Regulators set strict guidelines for quality and traceability. Factories test every batch for heavy metals and impurities, and published clinical data supports the safety of these additives in small doses. But science marches on. Some research teams have explored plant-based color substitutes, like riboflavin or turmeric, but these often fade over time or react with ingredients in the pill. Cost plays its own role—natural options are usually more expensive, and insurance rarely covers the extra charge. Manufacturers like to stick to ingredients with clear safety records, and tartrazine aluminum lake fits the bill, for now.
Education matters just as much as chemistry. Pharmacies and prescribers can support patients by flagging sources of artificial dyes and sharing options for those who want to avoid them. For people with true sensitivities, more choices would make a world of difference. Until then, the science suggests minimal risk for most people, but listening to individual concerns never goes out of style.
Anyone working in the pharmaceutical world understands the close scrutiny over every ingredient. Tartrazine Aluminum Lake, a synthetic dye, regularly shows up in tablets, syrups, and some topical products. Achieving a pharma-grade status in line with British Pharmacopoeia (BP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and United States Pharmacopeia (USP) means this color additive has jumped through hoops set by three of the world’s toughest regulatory frameworks.
Each of these standards sets rules for purity, solubility, particle size, heavy metal limits, and labeling. The BP lays out purity benchmarks: the content of dye must not fall below the stated range, typically above 85% as pure color. Heavy metal contamination (like lead, arsenic, or mercury) must stay below single-digit parts per million. Mercury, for example, usually must not exceed 1 ppm. These limits matter because people count on the safety of medicines, and traces of contaminants can cause issues, especially for those taking long-term medication.
The EP addresses both chemical purity and the form of the product. Pharmaceutical companies need a uniform, well-dispersing powder, so the aluminum lake sticks to a specified particle size, usually less than 10 microns. Consistency matters not just for appearance, but for precise dosing and to make sure people get the same amount every time.
The USP is no less strict. It dictates not only the purity and composition of the dye but also details tests for insoluble matter, pH, and fluorescence. Products also get checked for microbial contamination. Any colorant going into medicine must pass sterility and be free from microorganisms, which stops the risk of infections.
These aren’t just bureaucratic hurdles. My own experience working alongside pharmaceutical technicians tells me that quality lapses—even tiny ones—can spiral quickly. Just last year, a supply chain mishap involving non-compliant dye led to a recall, causing weeks of delays.
BP, EP, and USP lay out tests for color strength and clarity. If the color doesn’t disperse as expected or if impurities cloud the product, a batch fails long before it comes close to shelves.
Allergies and hypersensitivity draw added focus, as some people react strongly to Tartrazine. Labeling calls out the presence of this dye, not only to keep pharma companies out of court but also to help patients avoid adverse reactions.
The specifications highlight what’s at stake. Only rigorous control at every stage, from sourcing raw materials to mixing and testing, keeps product quality on track. GMP-certified plants, cleanroom environments, and regular validation testing form the backbone of compliance. Staff retraining—often costly—happens every few years because guidelines evolve, and regulators constantly update what's defined as safe or acceptable.
There’s room for improvement. Suppliers could embrace blockchain tracking for ingredient sourcing, making it easier to trace quality issues. Governments might also offer stronger incentives to manufacturers who invest in strict compliance.
Raw ingredient testing remains crucial. Labs checking each shipment, not just the final product, can stop problems before they start. A strong focus on purity, cross-contamination prevention, and supplier transparency moves the needle toward safer drugs.
Most folks scan their food labels for sugar or calories, only to stumble over things like "Tartrazine" and "Tartrazine Aluminum Lake." With both showing up in popular snacks and medicines, it’s worth asking why companies bother with two versions of what looks like the same yellow coloring.
Tartrazine is a synthetic yellow dye better known by its number: Yellow No. 5. It pops up in lemon-flavored drinks, candy, and cereals, not just for the color, but for that sunny look that sells. This dye dissolves in water. Pour some lemonade with Tartrazine into your cup—the color blends evenly, bright and clear.
Tartrazine Aluminum Lake tells a different story. It starts with the same color, but chemists bind the dye to aluminum salts. Now, the color becomes water-insoluble and grabs onto fats and oils instead. Companies use it where regular Tartrazine would bleed, fade, or just not stick on the product. You’ll notice it in coated pills, candy shells, and certain baked goods.
Ever wonder why crunchy candies keep their color when dropped in a hot drink? That’s the work of the "lake" version. It holds on tight, so the color doesn’t run into your tea or coat your tongue with a bright stain. In baking, regular Tartrazine can break down or fade, but products colored with the aluminum lake remain stable, even at higher temperatures or when exposed to light.
Sometimes the issue is oil. I’ve baked cookies with food coloring and seen regular dyes streak and pool in the dough. Aluminum lake dyes, though, blend evenly with fats, leaving a vibrant color instead of blotches. I’ve seen the difference in homemade lip balms too. A water-soluble dye turns grainy or separates, while the lake version looks smooth and even.
People raise concerns about food dyes for good reason. Both versions of Tartrazine have been linked to reactions, like hives or rare allergy flare-ups. For those with sensitivities or on restricted diets (such as kids with ADHD, where studies suggest a link), spotting these colorings on a package is a small act of self-defense. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EFSA enforce strict rules. Every batch goes through tests for safety, purity, and proper labeling.
Some European countries flag foods with Tartrazine for parents. A warning might show up right under the ingredients list, reminding customers about possible effects on children’s behavior.
A lot of people want fewer synthetic additives. I lean toward products that skip these dyes or use natural ones like turmeric or beta-carotene, especially for foods my family eats a lot. Some brands read the room and switch to natural yellows. The cleaner label movement pushes companies to rethink their color choices. Modern technology helps, like microencapsulation, locking in natural dyes for longer shelf life.
Educating yourself goes beyond “is this bad for me?” It means thinking about how color works in food, how your body deals with additives, and what you want out of the products you buy. The real difference between Tartrazine and its aluminum lake version boils down to where and how the color needs to last. Making informed choices helps shape the kinds of foods and medicines we’ll have in years to come.
Tartrazine Aluminum Lake brings bright yellow color to tablets and capsules, and drugmakers often turn to it because it holds up well under light, heat, and assorted processing methods. Being a synthetic dye, it’s created for color consistency rather than any medicinal value. Governments classify it as a food and drug colorant; you’ll spot it in over-the-counter pills and sometimes even in prescription forms.
People notice Tartrazine first for its color, yet it's the body’s reaction that causes concern. The biggest issue is allergic response. Not everybody is affected, but for some—especially people sensitive to aspirin—Tartrazine triggers hives, sneezing, or even asthma attacks. For years, I’ve checked labels for family members who get wheezy or break out in rashes after eating or taking drugs dyed yellow. Even the FDA and health agencies in Europe highlight these risks; some research points out that between 1-2% of those with allergies or asthma may have a reaction.
Links between Tartrazine and hyperactivity in children spark heated debate. While the science is still deciding how much of a connection exists, several studies show some kids act out more after consuming dyes like this. Because of these worries, the UK and EU require warnings on products with Tartrazine. Having watched parents juggling behavioral issues at home, I understand their push for clearer labeling and more transparent ingredient lists.
Each country treats Tartrazine a little differently. In the United States, the FDA sets a maximum limit for how much can be used in drugs and checks that products follow strict labeling rules. Prescriptions and over-the-counter medicines with this dye need to spell it out by name on the ingredient label. Canada and the European Union impose similar rules, although the EU requires a bold warning that reads: “May have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.”
Some nations, like Norway, avoid the risk altogether by banning Tartrazine in food or medicine. Even countries allowing it enforce limits to keep exposure as low as possible, especially for children or people with previously reported allergies. Healthcare workers remain alert for adverse reactions and report incidents to regulatory bodies.
People expect drugs to be safe. Even if a color seems harmless, it shouldn’t put anyone at unnecessary risk. For patients who have asthma or allergies—or parents whose kids get hyperactive—the presence of Tartrazine can prompt serious questions. As a parent and someone who has spent hours in pharmacies, I know how confusing it can feel sorting through ingredient lists. While companies might claim the dye makes pills more attractive or easier to identify, those arguments don’t matter much if users wind up in the ER.
Drug makers can switch to natural alternatives like beta-carotene or turmeric in place of synthetic dyes. Changes to manufacturing methods can reduce reliance on artificial colorants without sacrificing the appearance patients expect. Pharmacists and doctors should keep patients informed, especially when someone has known dye sensitivities. The best move balances clear labeling, strict oversight, and ongoing research. People deserve to know exactly what they’re putting into their bodies and feel confident that every part of a medicine, even the color, supports their health instead of threatening it.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | aluminium [5-hydroxy-6-oxo-1-(4-sulfonatophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfonatophenyl)hydrazinylidene]-6H-pyran-2-yl]methyl sulfonate |
| Other names |
FD&C Yellow No. 5 Aluminum Lake E102 Aluminum Lake C.I. Pigment Yellow 37 Food Yellow 4 Aluminum Lake Acid Yellow 23 Aluminum Lake |
| Pronunciation | /ˈtɑːr.trə.ziːn əˈluː.mɪ.nəm leɪk/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 12225-21-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | Beilstein Reference 2062298 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:86361 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2103839 |
| ChemSpider | 2232251 |
| DrugBank | DB13909 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03e4c111-96a9-4a6e-bdcb-03c6e9e58c27 |
| EC Number | E102 |
| Gmelin Reference | 106419 |
| KEGG | C16245 |
| MeSH | D015844 |
| PubChem CID | 5284440 |
| RTECS number | GM8925000 |
| UNII | 7DZM8F9F8M |
| UN number | UN1325 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | CompTox Dashboard (EPA)": "DTXSID7034288 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C16H8N4Na2O10S2·xAl(OH)3 |
| Molar mass | 534.39 g/mol |
| Appearance | Bright yellow to orange-yellow powder |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.60 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble in water |
| log P | 2.45 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 6.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.1 |
| Dipole moment | 0 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A16AX |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | May cause allergic reactions; possible respiratory, skin, and eye irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS labelling: "Warning; H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Pictograms | GHS07, GHS09 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. H335: May cause respiratory irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary statements: P261, P264, P270, P272, P273, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | NFPA 704: 1-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 210 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (Oral, Rat): > 2,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): >2000 mg/kg (Rat, Oral) |
| NIOSH | GRN No. 0002 |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 7.5 mg/kg bw |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | No IDLH established. |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Sunset Yellow FCF Aluminum Lake Quinoline Yellow Aluminum Lake Allura Red AC Aluminum Lake Ponceau 4R Aluminum Lake Carmoisine Aluminum Lake Brilliant Blue FCF Aluminum Lake Erythrosine Aluminum Lake |
Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
