|
HS Code |
254044 |
| Chemical Name | 5-Chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one/2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one |
| Common Abbreviation | CMIT/MIT |
| Concentration | 14% MV |
| Appearance | Clear to yellowish liquid |
| Odor | Mild characteristic odor |
| Solubility | Soluble in water |
| Ph | 2.0-4.0 (at 25°C, as supplied) |
| Density | 1.19-1.21 g/cm3 (at 20°C) |
| Stability | Stable under recommended storage conditions |
| Primary Use | Preservative/biocide in industrial applications |
| Cas Number | 55965-84-9 |
| Composition Ratio | CMIT:MIT ≈ 3:1 |
| Flash Point | >100°C (aqueous solution) |
| Storage Conditions | Keep container tightly closed, store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area |
As an accredited 5-Chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one/2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent is packaged in a 25 kg blue HDPE drum with a sealed tamper-evident cap and labeled hazard warnings. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL container loads approximately 16MT CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent, packed in 250kg drums, totaling 64 drums per container. |
| Shipping | Shipping for **5-Chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one/2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent)** must comply with hazardous chemical regulations. Transport in tightly sealed, labeled containers, protected from sunlight and incompatible materials. Use appropriate secondary containment, and handle by trained personnel wearing suitable PPE. Follow all local, national, and international shipping guidelines. |
| Storage | Store **5-Chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one/2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent)** in a tightly closed, corrosion-resistant container in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area away from direct sunlight, heat sources, and incompatible substances such as strong oxidizers and acids. Avoid freezing and exposure to moisture. Use secondary containment to prevent spills, and ensure storage area has suitable chemical spill response equipment. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life of 5-Chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one/2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent) is typically 1 year. |
Competitive 5-Chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one/2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8618963613625 or mail to sales10@jeiferpharm.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618963613625
Email: sales10@jeiferpharm.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
After years on the factory floor and in the lab, you start seeing patterns in the types of questions customers bring up—nagging problems with microbial contamination, headaches from regulatory pressures, unexpected changes in production, downtime chasing elusive residues, trade-offs between performance and safety, or frustration with unreliable supply. These stories shape the way our chemists and engineers design preservation systems. 5-Chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one blended with 2-Methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, commonly known as CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent, is a response to real needs that don’t always show up in brochures or certificates. This is a complex, workhorse biocide, not a one-size-fits-all solution, and that matters when uptime, compliance, and reputation are on the line.
Our industry’s relationship with isothiazolinone blends stretches back to the early efforts to protect water-based products without phenolic preservatives or heavy metals. Years ago, single active systems couldn’t stand up to new microbial threats or rising pH levels in high-performance coatings, adhesives, and personal care formulations. Product recalls in Europe and North America taught tough lessons about what can go wrong with overlooked raw materials. The move toward multi-component blends with balanced stability, like CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent, grew out of these real failures, not just theoretical research. We watched partners in the paint, paper, and cosmetic trades face hard realities: black specks in latex, viscosity loss in adhesives, shelf-life cuts in shampoo bases. Reacting to those challenges, we leaned on careful adjustment of blend ratios, integration of sodium salts (for divalency), and purity controls that go beyond easy-to-measure parameters. Nobody wants to scrap a batch because a preservative went off-spec or failed under new environmental demands. This product has lived through field tests involving multi-ton production vessels, re-used process water, and unexpected raw material changes. When a preservative blend passes all those hurdles, it earns its keep. That reliability defines CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent—the kind of detail often missed by marketers pushing simple purity claims.
CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent contains a solid, rigorously monitored blend of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one in an aqueous medium, held at a 14% total active concentration, with the full benefit of sodium salt stabilization. That “divalent” tag isn’t just a label; the addition of sodium salts tightens the product’s chemical profile, offering better resilience in alkaline or variable pH systems. Everything from particle size to ionic strength gets fine-tuned before release. Batch tracking ties back to both raw material origins and in-plant testing results. In a market where traceability means more than data entry, these details shape day-to-day operations, not just audit checklists.
Experience teaches the hard way that minor mistakes in actives—blending, degradation, or unexpected side-reactions—can hit line yields or even drive regulatory investigations. With this biocide blend, our QA team puts extra rigor into decomposition product screening and the documentation of every sodium adjustment. That’s not for marketing—it's about meeting the same strict standards we’ve set for our own internal use. 14% w/v concentration gives formulators a sweet spot: enough potency for robust antimicrobial impact, without tipping over into regulatory red flags in North America, Europe, or Asia-Pacific. That allows safer buffer when calculating end-use concentration in manufactured goods.
The real-world strength of this blend comes from its flexibility and established track record. We serve partners in water-based paints, adhesives, latex emulsions, and industrial coatings who run both continuous high-volume lines and agile specialty batches. CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent handles high-throughput environments, where process water routinely recirculates, and where microbial stress jumps with a single slip in sanitation. Rapid knockdown of both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, along with fungal suppression, keeps finished goods stable through unpredictable shipping routes or weather shifts. As climate changes affect supply chains, the blend’s broad-spectrum punch gives manufacturers a margin of safety that single actives or older blends couldn’t always deliver. In the pulp and paper sector, challenges with high organic loads and fluctuating pH levels once overwhelmed simpler preservatives, leading to downtime and lost revenue. This blend’s sodium salt stabilization consistently prevents rapid hydrolysis in alkaline stock or recycled white water, extending tank lifespans and protecting sheet quality. Our customers in cosmetics and personal care formulation navigate the double threat of heavy contamination and stricter residue regulations. CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent meets rising demands for preservative longevity, post-sale safety, and transparent supply chain traceability. Its track record helps brand owners defend claims when facing audits or consumer pushback.
No one biocide blend fits every scenario, and every plant seems to throw its own curveballs. A common question pits CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent against pure MIT solutions, older formaldehyde donors, or single-component CMIT. Over time, we’ve watched how these choices play out under pressure. Pure MIT, without the sodium-salt support or dual-active synergy, often falters in robust microbial challenge, especially against biofilm-forming bacteria. In plants running high throughput, we’ve seen single-active systems fall below the minimum inhibitory concentration, leading to corner-case contamination. Older approaches—formaldehyde releasers or phenol-based options—run into increasingly restrictive chemical bans, worker health worries, and issues with allergenicity. Single CMIT blends show stronger antimicrobial activity than some next-generation actives at very low dosages but expose end-users to higher skin and eye irritation risks at equivalent in-use concentrations. The ratio used in our blend keeps irritation profiles in check at typical use rates, while sodium ion addition reduces free-chlorine volatility. In practice, this means fewer problems in both worker handling and product application.
Switching preservatives midstream, based on spot contamination or last-minute specifications, often causes catastrophic batch failures. Our CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent formulation avoids some of the variability pitfalls introduced by minor suppliers, off-brand imports, or batch-blending on production floors. Even small adjustments in salt type or concentration spell big changes for isothiazolinone stability and performance—details some secondary suppliers gloss over. The upshot: consistent batches, reliable protection, and fewer line stoppages.
Years of direct feedback from production teams, regulatory affairs, and downstream processors inform the safety profile we build—and defend—for CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent. Unlike some legacy materials, this biocide blend navigates current and emerging restrictions in Europe, North America, and parts of Asia. It stays below thresholds tied to allowable concentrations in finished products, which means fewer product reformulations or emergency line shutdowns when compliance standards evolve. Our regular in-house reviews cross-match international lists—ECHA's regulatory measures, US EPA updates, K-REACH notifications—to anticipate fit within core application areas. That work stops issues before they escalate, as opposed to relying on outside audits. Clear, thorough documentation and SDS control come straight from source—every adjustment (e.g., switching to lower-allergen sodium salts) aims to simplify workplace handling and reduce user risk. Workers regularly cite easier handling: less dust, lower residue stubbornness, greater batch-to-batch predictability.
One of the major complaints we hear from buyers switching suppliers: prior lots would suddenly shift in clarity, color, or reactivity, directly impacting process runs. Often, these shifts trace back to secondary sourcing, poor temperature control, or lazy blending at the supplier’s end. From our own experience, producing CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent at industrial scale means continuous monitoring—raw sodium and isothiazolinones get checked for residual impurities before they’re even blended, and lot samples from every batch face stress-tests: UV, pH, and microbial challenge. Years ago, missed details in sodium dissolution led to nonuniform activity or visible residues in high-end emulsion paints. We fixed that by refining our temperature ramp control and implementing in-line blending—with full documentation on what dial-ins led to improvement. Our unique approach keeps the blend stable, responsive, and consistent across millions of liters. Quality claims start at the feedstock level, not just end-point analysis. There’s an old phrase in chemicals—“Good quality isn’t tested in, it’s built in.” That’s been our reality producing CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent on the line: invest up front, test throughout, and production hiccups drop off sharply down the line for our customers.
We’ve partnered with both regional paint manufacturers and global adhesives players facing rapid contamination spikes during seasonal changes. In several cases, switching from older blends to CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent brought microbial stability from a few days to several months, even in the face of rough transport or unpredictable warehouse conditions. On paper, such a result hinges on isothiazolinone blend ratios and sodium salt stabilization. On the shop floor, that stability means reduced wastage, predictable viscosity, and the ability to meet seasonal inventory peaks without last-minute reformulation.
Pulp and paper plants running recycled stock now see longer intervals between machine cleanouts. Savings stack up through reduced downtime, but more importantly, operators notice improved consistency in sheet quality and less off-odor. Many personal care formulators tap this blend not just for performance, but for traceability and audit-readiness—establishing compliance both for regulatory screens and consumer-facing requirements. Comparing feedback over the years shows a pattern: better tolerance to recipe adjustments, less variability during switchovers, and fewer last-minute supply setbacks.
Fielding technical support calls, we often hear about misconceptions or challenges tied to preservative additions. Some producers worry that higher pH or salt content might inactivate actives. Others blame raw material interference for inconsistent results, not realizing the extent of cross-reactions possible in high-electrolyte or high-organic-load systems. Real troubleshooting usually starts by reviewing mixing points and line cleaning logs. We show partners that slow, staged additions can minimize spot overdosing and keep sodium concentration even across tank volumes. In high-shear lines, flash mixing helps, but attention to blend order and temperature remains crucial. Several clients realized process water quality masked actives’ true performance—foulants or water softeners can either cripple antimicrobial action or, worse, boost unwanted by-products. Extensive batch and real-use testing have driven refinements in our recommended handling protocols. Some customers initially aim for the lowest possible in-use concentration, prioritizing regulatory caution. Over years of tracking product stability, we’ve learned that suboptimal dosing nearly always triggers downstream recovery costs. Targeting the middle of the recommended dosage window gives the best blend of shelf life, cost-per-batch, and peace of mind during audit.
Pressure to cut overall chemical use and minimize environmental impact grows every year. We track changing hazard classifications not just as compliance targets, but as driving forces in our R&D cycles. Past regulatory shifts forced out entire classes of organic preservatives; lessons from those years inform our push for low-residue, water-soluble, and easily tracked biocide systems. Our CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent formula aims for tight emission control and full degradation accountability. This translates not only to safe effluent handling at customer plants, but ultimately to better community and worker confidence. Sustainability isn’t a slogan in daily production. Raw material sourcing, waste minimization in blending, and recovery from cleanout cycles play out as measurable results: cleaner records, easier permitting, and less reputational risk. These are details we battle with suppliers and field teams alike—pressure from downstream buyers and site inspectors makes real change happen.
We know aggressive pricing and flashy packaging draw attention, especially in commodity procurement cycles. Still, long-term users tell us that lower-cost biocides show higher rates of precipitate formation, unexpected color drift, and end-use instability. Minor, repeated failures—rather than big recalls—erode confidence in production lines and expose operators to higher management scrutiny. We frequently rescue lines where low-activity or irregular blends led to lost batches; our records show that even small swings in active ratio or salt charge become expensive mistakes. CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent keeps its sodium load and actives strictly within target bands. That margin means operators spend less time firefighting micro-contamination or troubleshooting filter clogs and more time moving product out the door. Batch-to-batch consistency isn’t just a QC slogan—it cuts rework, product holds, and surprise headaches. Another consistent dividing line: retrofit readiness. Changing over from another isothiazolinone or mixed biocide blend often triggers compatibility problems. Our crews and technical partners monitor the performance of our material in “dirty” tanks—stuff that’s seen repeated raw changes, challenging water, and excipients incompatible with older systems. The blend copes without the “spikes and dips” in preservative profile seen with more finicky actives. The result: smoother changeovers, faster line ramp-up, and happier compliance staff.
No product launch or marketing claim can replace the hands-on experience gained from decades running reactors, blending lines, or trouble-shooting at customer plants. CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent’s development, adjustment, and continued fit with changing end-use markets comes not just from regulatory chase, but from cycles of feedback, failure, and steady improvement. We ask why customers switched, how they run lines, and what their own downstream complaints reveal. Smarter, safer, and more reliable preservation starts from this kind of direct exchange. As quality targets rise and both safety and environmental demands sharpen, the details in sourcing, production, and delivery matter more than slogans or theoretical claims. This is why our teams commit to continual process reviews, tight quality control, and transparent reporting. Trust builds over thousands of tons shipped, not a single batch or sample. For users chasing dependable, streamlined, and regulatory-aligned antimicrobial protection, the value of CMIT/MIT-14%MV Divalent grows with every problem solved and every successful batch off the line. Ask any crew member or plant supervisor—we build these preservative blends as much for our own standards as for our customers'.